u/Expert_Ad8640

After season 3 I have seen a lot of boosted players. Like lvl 120 not getting 5-0ed by lvl 80s with onyx 2 rank . Or I have noticed archnems that I could beat ( I peaked onyx 2 nowhere near archnem). I have a feeling that all the "skilled" players are playing more and more only in tournaments. It's because ranked is unplayable . I myself am diamond 2 right now with 236 ranked wins this season and I'm only diamond.... Nosiny should really fix his game .

Fav loadout : Ar , Rev , Fist , Grenade

Ranked loadout : Burst , Exo , Battle Axe , Med kit

Fav map : Docks

Level : 190

Highest ws taken : 3.7k

Highest ws: 980

So y'all ask questions like fav loadout , fav map etc. And then guess my rank .

I'm plat 1 rn which is really bad I need a dou region EU

China’s political system is often criticized for being authoritarian, but there is a strong argument that, in practice, it has delivered better outcomes for many of its citizens than a democratic system might have—at least under current conditions. One of the strongest pieces of evidence is economic development. Over the past four decades, China has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, which is widely considered one of the largest improvements in living standards in human history. This rapid progress was made possible in part because the government can plan long-term and implement policies quickly, without being slowed down by elections, political gridlock, or short-term populism. Large infrastructure projects, like high-speed rail networks and entire new cities, are completed at a speed that would be difficult in most democracies. Another important factor is political stability. Democracies can sometimes suffer from polarization, frequent leadership changes, and policy reversals. In contrast, China’s centralized system allows for continuity in leadership and policy direction. This stability can create a more predictable environment for economic growth and long-term planning, which benefits both businesses and citizens. China’s system also emphasizes meritocratic elements within the government. Officials often rise through the ranks based on performance in local or regional roles, meaning that leadership positions are not purely determined by popularity, but also by administrative competence. In theory, this can lead to more technically capable governance compared to democratic systems where elected leaders may lack expertise. Additionally, public opinion within China is more complex than often assumed. Surveys and studies have shown relatively high levels of trust in government among Chinese citizens, especially when compared to some democracies where trust in institutions is declining. This suggests that, for many people, the system is seen as legitimate because it delivers tangible improvements in daily life. However, it’s important to acknowledge the trade-offs. The same system that allows for efficiency and stability also limits political freedoms, such as free speech and open opposition. Whether one system is “better” ultimately depends on how much weight is given to economic progress and stability versus individual political rights. In conclusion, the argument that China’s current system works well for its population is supported by its rapid economic growth, political stability, and ability to implement long-term policies effectively. While it is not without significant downsides, it demonstrates that different political systems can produce different kinds of success depending on a country’s history, culture, and priorities.