
Nearly half of large NSE options flow is someone SELLING - and scoring it as buying flips the result
Made a scoring mistake today, caught it, and I think it's a common one.
I log large options prints on NSE and mark each one from the flag to the next session's close. Friday's flags marked at Monday's close: 413 readable prints.
First pass I scored every flag as if you had BOUGHT the option. Result: 22% up, 78% down. Looked terrible.
Then I split by aggressor - which side actually crossed the spread to get filled:
Buyer-side: 52.2% of prints. 19.3% went their way.
Seller-side: 44.5% of prints. 75.8% went their way.
For a writer, the premium FALLING is the win. Scoring a sell-side print as a buy counts a writer's profitable decay as a loss.
Scored properly, by side: 45.3%, not 22%.
Concrete example from Friday:
VOLTAS 1340 PE - bought at 42.85, closed 82.35. +92% for the buyer.
VOLTAS 1320 CE - written at 46.75, closed 6.60. +86% for the writer. Score that as a buy and it reads as -86%.
Same stock, adjacent strikes, both flagged, both worked - for opposite sides.
A lot of the seller-side wins were just weekend theta, three calendar days Friday to Monday.
The general point: if you read options flow anywhere, check whether the source knows which side crossed the spread. If it doesn't, "unusual activity" is volume with a label on it.
One feed, one venue, premium change only - not advice.