
Not sure what to think about this strike-off
Report in the Gazette today: https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/junior-struck-off-over-stolen-bike-insurance-claim/5127700.article
Some Redditors will know the bloke. The chap might even read this.
I then read the SDT judgement. You’ll find it here: https://solicitorstribunal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/12863-2025-Ferguson-1.pdf
I can’t reconcile the SDT’s statement that the solicitor was not ‘inherently dishonest’ with a finding of dishonesty. I’ve no doubt that the bloke was an idiot and I think he acted in a moment of madness caused by the particular circumstances. I can’t help but feel that in the particular circumstances of this case - important, that - this is a very harsh, severe, decision, the Tribunal seems to have been determined to strike off and then used tortuous logic to justify it. Striking off is awful, the ink barely dry on his practising certificate. I feel very sorry for him.
Just wondering what other professional lawyers think.