Aggressive vs conservation RRIF meltdown strategy
With so many planners promoting aggressive RRIF meltdowns to avoid that tax bomb at death I ran some scenarios with 1M RRIF 200k TFSA for a couple age 70, 4% returns, 2% CPI, 70% survivor spend rate, avg CPP/OAS of 38k, 60k spend rate
For each age range xx/yy where xx/yy=lifespan of each spouse, I filled the lowest (BC) 19.6% tax bracket for each spouse (conservative and the 31% bracket (115k) aggressive
Age 85/85 Estate was about the same within 5% after taxes ~1.3M
Age 75/85 Again estate within 5% after taxes ~1.3M
Age 95/95 Estate higher by ~10% with the conservative meltdown and lower with aggressive ~1.7M/1.5M
Conclusion: Unless you both die early it doesn't make much difference if you choose aggressive or conservative. If either expects a long life then go conservative because paying less front end taxes provides a larger RRIF for more growth