
u/FrequentTranslator87

Looking for a beginner-friendly baking/pastry school in Davao 🍰
Hi! I’m looking for a **baking/pastry school or short course in Davao** that’s suitable for a complete beginner/first-timer.
I’d love to learn the basics properly, especially things like:
Cakes & basic pastries
Bread/baking fundamentals
Cake decorating
Proper use of baking equipment
I’m not looking for a professional degree necessarily. just a **hands-on class where beginners are welcome and actually get to do the baking themselves**.
If you’ve personally attended a baking/pastry school or class in Davao, I’d really appreciate your recommendations! 😊
**Bonus if you can share:**
• School/class name
• Location
• Approximate tuition/fees
• How long the course is
• Your experience there
Davao City or anywhere reasonably accessible within Davao is okay. Thank you! 🥐❤️
GPT watching me ask which air fryer to buy while OpenAI’s other agents are solving Millennium Prize problems
Anthropic's usage limits are a joke compared to Astra
The 800-Year-Old Diary Entry That Turned Out to Be a Solar Storm Warning
In his diary Meigetsuki (“The Record of the Clear Moon”), Japanese courtier and poet Fujiwara no Teika described a strange red vapor stretching across the Kyoto sky for three consecutive nights in February 1204. Kyoto sits at a relatively low latitude for witnessing an aurora, since auroral lights are normally confined near the poles. The stronger the solar storm, the closer to the equator they can be seen, so Teika was almost certainly describing something he had no framework to understand.
Centuries later, scientists went looking for physical proof. By examining carbon-14 levels trapped in the rings of ancient buried trees, researchers found a solar cycle disturbance from the same era, although the spike itself actually dated a few years earlier, between 1200 and 1201, matching separate aurora and sunspot records from China and Korea. That earlier event was calculated to be roughly 14 times larger than the strongest solar storm ever recorded in the modern era, the famous storm of February 1956. A storm of that scale today wouldn’t just paint the sky red, it would be catastrophic for satellites, power grids, and global communications, all confirmed by cross-referencing a medieval poet’s diary with tree rings buried in the ground for 800 years.
Looks like another marketing campaign to me lol
Why does vibe coding always stop at SaaS apps and landing pages?
Why does vibe coding always stop at SaaS apps and landing pages?
This level of performance at this price is unbelievable. GLM-5.3-Flash is going to be the default choice for most tasks and projects.
SQ3R method helped me to get 98% on biology.
SQ3R is one of the underrated study method but super effective to built a real understanding on the topics, it is simple structured study technique that helped me a lot and not just do a passive reading.
Here's the full guide on how I use SQ3R method when I am studying:
S- survey. I scan the chapter I am going to study first, including the headings, sub headings, summaries and diagrams. Its a must to get a bigger picture when you're scanning the material so your brain will knows what to look for.
Q- questions. I used to do passive reading only but I turn it into active reading, I make questionnaires by the title of the material.
3R- read, recite, review. I read the textbook/notes and look for the answers to the questions I made. Use active recall, close the book and recite the main ideas outloud. And I check if I missed or forgot anything from the lecture, so I can review and revisit the weak points.
This method actually helped to force my brain to engage. Try to use this so next time you'll open your book, instead of just reading it- work through it.
I used to sort tires as a career, and it wasn't as fun as it sounds
Hey everyone. I work as a scrap yard manager now, kind of like Michael Keaton in that Spider-Man movie, IYKYK. I'm doing quite well now, but it definitely wasn't this smooth when I started.
I wasn't really interested in my studies back then, and I was pretty tight on money. Just to make a living, I decided to join a recycling plant nearby. My job was to sort and organize tires.
I used to be kind of a movie buff when I was younger.
I'd seen Sylvester Stallone training with tires and beating the shit out of guys, so I said to myself, "Why not? Maybe working with tires will be kind of cool."
It wasn't nearly as fun as I thought it would be.
First of all, I had to sort the tires based on their size, material type, brand, and so on, which honestly wasn't that bad. But then I also had to load and unload those tires manually. After doing that for an entire day, it used to suck the soul out of me. By the end of the day, I genuinely used to wonder who was more worn out, the tires or me.
Then I also had to classify which machine a particular tire was supposed to go into. Would it go into the baler, the shredder, or onto the conveyor belt? After finishing the day's stock, I still had to clean the whole area before leaving, all while dealing with constant dust, grease, mud, and everything else that comes with a scrap yard.
And I hardly even made minimum wage for it.
I'm doing much better now, and I guess all I want to say is that if there's a will, there's a way.
These days, there are various machines in my scrap yard that handle most of the lifting, but those first few years of working with tires were easily some of the weirdest and toughest jobs I've ever done.
Funny enough, I still catch myself looking at old tires and automatically thinking about which pile they belong in.
Some habits never really leave you, I guess.
The death of buttons and menus? Naval on the future of interfaces:
Darth Vader trying to return a library book 47 years late
Librarian: Sir, this book was due in 1979.
Darth Vader: I find your lack of late-fee forgiveness disturbing.
Librarian: It’s $56
Darth Vader: …I have altered the fee. Pray I don’t alter it further.
Librarian: That’s not how library fines work.
Darth Vader: breathes aggressively
Librarian: Please stop intimidating the other patrons.
Darth Vader: Fine. I’ll just use the drop box.
The drop box immediately gets crushed by the Force.
Librarian: …sir.
Darth Vader: My apologies.
How I stopped using NotebookLM as a summary tool and started using it as a critical sounding board
When NotebookLM first dropped, most of the discussion revolved around using it to summarize massive PDFs or generate those hyper-realistic podcasts. Like a lot of people, I initially treated it as an efficiency shortcut: drop in a 50-page report, get a quick overview, and move on.
Eventually, I realized that using it just to summarize meant I was missing its actual strengths. Summaries flatten nuance. The real value comes when you use it to challenge your own thinking or find blind spots in dense material.
Here is the setup that completely changed how I interact with my notebooks:
1. The "Red Team" Strategy Instead of asking for a summary of a proposal, strategy document, or set of research notes, upload your draft along with 2-3 counter-perspective documents (industry critiques, alternative methodologies, or conflicting study findings).
Prompt: "Based on Source A (my proposal) and Sources B/C (critiques/data), act as an adversarial reviewer. What are the 3 weakest assumptions in my argument, and which specific data points in Sources B and C directly contradict them?"
2. Cross-Source Edge Mapping When working with multiple long-form sources (e.g., transcripts, research papers, or user feedback logs), standard chat LLMs often hallucinate connections or drift off-topic. NotebookLM’s strict grounding lets you map discrepancies precisely.
Prompt: "Identify every instance where Source 1 and Source 3 disagree on [Topic X]. Format this as a list with direct quotes from both sources and brief citations."
3. The Inverse FAQ Instead of asking "What are the key takeaways?", flip the script to find gaps in your source material.
Prompt: "What critical questions regarding [Topic] are completely unanswered or unaddressed across all uploaded sources?"
Shifting from "summarize this for me" to "stress-test this source grounded strictly in these texts" turned NotebookLM from a passive reading assistant into a genuine sparring partner.
For those who use NotebookLM regularly in their workflow: What is a prompt or technique you’ve found that actually yields high-value insights rather than just surface-level synthesis?
trying to explain qwen 27b irl makes me sound mentally unwell
NotebookLM got much more useful for me when I stopped treating it like a summarizer
I used to dump a bunch of PDFs into NotebookLM, ask for a summary, read it once, and move on.
That worked, but it felt like I was using maybe 20% of what made the tool useful.
What changed was giving it a very specific job.
For example, instead of:
“Summarize these documents.”
I started asking things like:
“Compare how these three sources explain the same topic. Point out where they agree, where they contradict each other, and cite the specific source for each claim.”
Or:
“I’m trying to understand this topic well enough to explain it to someone else. Ask me 10 questions based only on the uploaded sources. Don’t show the answers until I respond.”
The second approach has been surprisingly useful because it turns the notebook into something closer to a study partner rather than a document summarizer.
Another thing I found helpful: keep your source collection focused.
If I throw 30 loosely related documents into one notebook, the answers become less useful to me. When I separate sources by project/topic, I can ask much more specific questions and actually remember where information came from.
One workflow I've been experimenting with:
Collect → question → challenge → test
Add the sources.
Ask NotebookLM to identify the important ideas and disagreements.
Ask it to challenge my understanding with questions.
Answer without looking at the sources.
Go back and check where I was wrong.
That last part has been more valuable than simply rereading summaries.
I'm curious how other people here are actually using
NotebookLM beyond “summarize this PDF.”
What's one prompt or workflow you've found that genuinely changed how useful your notebooks are?
The Sell-Side Interview Mistake I See Candidates Make Too Often
A lot of candidates prepare for IB, ER, S&T, Corporate Banking, or Capital Markets interviews like they're studying for an exam.
They memorize technical questions.
Then the interviewer asks, “Why?”
That’s where things often fall apart.
Technical prep is important, but you need to understand the logic behind the answer—not just the answer itself.
For example, don’t just memorize how a DCF works. Be comfortable explaining:
• Why WACC matters
• What happens when terminal growth changes
• Why higher capex affects free cash flow
• How assumptions can materially change valuation
Same with accounting. If you're asked how a $10 increase in depreciation affects the three statements, you should be able to reason through it rather than recite a memorized template.
For ER/S&T candidates, I’d also recommend having one stock pitch you genuinely understand.
Know:
→ Your thesis
→ Catalysts
→ Valuation
→ Key risks
→ What would make you change your mind
And one underrated part of preparation: practice being interrupted.
Real interviews aren't always clean Q&A. Interviewers may challenge an assumption, ask a follow-up, or push you to explain something differently.
Practice answering out loud and getting pushed back.
The goal isn't to sound like you memorized the interview guide.
It's to sound like you actually understand finance.
For those who have recruited recently: what question or part of the process caught you most off guard?
Technicals, behavioral, stock pitch, or networking?
I’ll be around in the comments—curious to hear what others experienced.
The UGC roadmap to your first $10k month
I see a lot of posts about how to start UGC, but not that many about what the path looks like once you want to turn it into real income.
And just to get this out of the way:
$10k/month isn't something you should expect in your first month.
Some people get there ridiculously fast, some take much longer, and a lot of people never get there because they treat UGC like random freelance gigs instead of something they're actually trying to get better at.
But after seeing how creators grow from basically zero to solid monthly income, I think the roadmap is pretty clear.
Phase 1: Become hireable
Before worrying about rates, retainers or whatever someone on Tiktok says you should charge, you need to give a brand a reason to take a chance on you.
And you really don't need much.
I'd start with 3 genuinely good videos, (dont make 20 mid videos)
Just pick products/apps you understand and make content around them like it was a real campaign.
You need to have a good pacing, a strong opening, knowing how to tell a story and then bringing the product into that story naturally.
Ur content need to make someone running a campaign think:
"yeah, I could give this person a brief and they'd probably make something usable"
Phase 2: Stop being precious about your first deals
This is probably where people disagree with me the most.
If you're completely new, I wouldn't sit around waiting for a $2k retainer.
Your first couple deals have value beyond the money.
You get:
i) a real brand work for your portfolio
ii) a case study
iii) experience reading briefs
iv) feedback from campaign managers
v) real data on what you're good at
I'd rather take a smaller trial or performance-based deal with a good company, absolutely crush it and use that to get the next opportunity
There is obviously a point where working for peanuts becomes stupid.
But when you have zero proof, optimizing exclusively for the highest possible rate is usually the wrong game.
Phase 3: Volume matters a lot
At the beginning, you're doing the outbound, nobody knows who you are.
So apply, a lot. that's it
UGC platforms, brands directly, Twitter/X, agencies, wherever you're finding legit campaigns.
And don't send 4 applications and decide
"UGC is oversaturated."
One of the guys in this video said if he started from zero he'd probably apply to 100 campaigns a day.
100 is obviously pretty insane for most people, but the point is right:
When you have no reputation yet, you need shots on goal.
Once you have strong work and some wins, brands start coming to you.
Phase 4: The easiest way to stand out is boring
Respond quickly, show up to calls, don't ghost and research the company before talking to them.
Come into the conversation with 2-3 ideas instead of asking them to explain their entire TikTok strategy to you.
This sounds ridiculously basic, but campaign managers notice it, and I'd start asking better questions too.
"what kind of content is converting for you right now?"
"what's the actual goal of this campaign?"
"are you optimizing for views, installs, signups, purchases?"
"what have your best creators done differently?"
You stop sounding like someone trying to collect a $300 check and start sounding like someone who might help grow the campaign.
Phase 5: Learn to make the BRAND money
This is probably the biggest jump.
Going viral and making absolutely nobody buy the product isn't useful to the company paying you.
The creators brands keep around are usually the ones thinking beyond views.
They reply to comments, make follow-up videos when people have questions, DM people who are interested*.*
They care whether the company is getting something back from the money it's spending and that's how a random one-month campaign starts turning into a 3,6 one year campaign.
And once you're producing revenue instead of just content, the "what should I charge per video?" conversation starts becoming way less important.
Phase 6: Build relationships
Something I didn't understand at first is how valuable the relationship with the person managing the campaign can become.
If you're easy to work with, consistently deliver and care about the campaign doing well, they have every reason to keep giving you more work.
And the longer you work together, the more valuable you become because you already know the product, audience, brand etc
The best situation is that you're still making content for them months later.
Phase 7: Eventually consolidate
Your first decent month might be messy.
Different briefs, different accounts, different managers, different posting schedules.
That's fine while you're building.
But I wouldn't want to stay there.
The end goal should be finding the campaigns where:
i) you're good at the content
ii) the brand values you
iii) there is recurring work iv) the base pay is good
iv) there's upside from CPM/view bonuses/performance
Then start dropping the crap.
Making $10k from 3 really good relationships is a completely different business from making $10k by juggling 30 random $300 gigs.
And treat the accounts/content you build like assets
This was one of the more interesting things I heard recently.
Some creators build campaign accounts from literally zero to tens of thousands of followers.
Once you've done that, your negotiating position changes massively.
Now the brand doesn't want to lose you, your account, audience and everything you've learned about making that product work.
That's leverage and higher retainers become easier, bonuses get better.
Some creators even move into managing campaigns or running teams and that's where
UGC starts looking much more like a real business.
So if I had to simplify the whole roadmap:
1) Learn to storytell 2) make 3 strong examples 4) apply like crazy 5) take the first useful opportunities 6) get real results 7) become ridiculously reliable 8) understand the brand's business 9) turn wins into longer relationships 10) slowly replace small gigs with higher-value recurring campaigns.
Not sexy but IMO it's a much more realistic roadmap thanq: "buy a ring light, make a Canva portfolio and charge $500/video."
I got a lot of this from this UGC breakdown and it's worth watching because they go much deeper into the creator/business side than most beginner guides:
Hope this was useful and gives you a more realistic roadmap without getting sold on all the fake promises around UGC