British Grand Prix predictions
What are your predictions for tomorrow’s race?
What are your predictions for tomorrow’s race?
After many requests from those of you kind enough to test the web app, I am pleased to announce that we have a live timing feature we will be testing and developing over the Silverstone GP Weekend.
If anyone would like to help test this please let me know. We are still continuing to push out updates across the weekend so please do not take this as the finished article.
Would love to know what other views people would like included in the live timing screens and your feedback will only help to shape development :)
You can also use the historical telemetry features to see where drivers are losing and gaining time ahead of sprint qualifying later today.
This is just my personal ranking of the most ingenious F1 technical innovations ever. I'm judging them based on a mix of engineering creativity, competitive advantage, and the impact they had on the sport.
There are loads of others that could make the list—fan cars, F-duct, blown diffusers, Brabham's hydropneumatic suspension, mass dampers, etc.
What's in your top five? And what do you think deserves to be #1?
This is just my personal ranking of the most ingenious F1 technical innovations ever. I'm judging them based on a mix of engineering creativity, competitive advantage, and the impact they had on the sport.
There are loads of others that could make the list—fan cars, F-duct, blown diffusers, Brabham's hydropneumatic suspension, mass dampers, etc.
What's in your top five? And what do you think deserves to be #1?
Exciting news, we are hoping to have the live timing feature of our app ready for the British Grand Prix and would be keen for some people to test it and provide feedback.
If you would like to be involved let me know down below 👇🏼
Kimi leading the title fight after Austria — 40 points up on Russell, five wins already — has been the story of the season, so I went digging into his telemetry to see how he's doing it rather than just that he is. One thing stood out.
Across the laps I looked at, his driving style seems to revolve around minimum speed through corners. Comparing his quali laps against others', he's consistently carrying more speed through the slow and medium stuff — higher apex/minimum speeds, stronger intermediate-sector speeds — and giving a little back on outright top speed which he can obviously thank the wonderful team at Brackley for building such a monster. It's a momentum-driver profile: keep the car loaded and rolling through the corner rather than braking hard, squaring it off, and firing out (similar to how Max likes to drive).
The contrast with Verstappen is the interesting part. On the laps I compared, Max is the opposite — he'll concede a touch mid-corner but claw it back with a better exit and higher terminal speed (more of the outright-fastest micro-sectors). Two completely different philosophies landing on nearly identical lap times.
What I find genuinely compelling is that Antonelli's high-minimum-speed style is usually associated with experienced drivers who really trust the car — it's not typically what you see from someone this early in their career. Whether that's the Mercedes suiting him or just how he drives, the data's pretty consistent about it across sessions.
Couple of honest caveats: this is from public timing/telemetry data, sampled at ~4Hz, so I'm talking about trends through corners rather than millimetre-precise racing lines. And qualifying pace ≠ race craft — this is one slice of the picture.
Curious what others make of it — is Antonelli's cornering style something you've noticed on the broadcasts, or is the eye test telling you something different? And does a high-minimum-speed style tend to age well over a season, or does it punish the tyres?
(For anyone interested in the nuts and bolts — I pulled this from a little F1 telemetry tool I've been tinkering with; happy to point you to it if useful, but the discussion's the fun part.)
I've been building an F1 stats and analysis web app on my own, and it's at the point where I need other eyes on it. It's completely free, no ads, no signup, no catch — I'm not trying to sell anything, I just want honest feedback before I keep building.
What it does right now:
One thing I care about: everything is derived from real data, and I've tried hard not to fake precision or guess. If the data can't tell you why a lap was slow, I don't pretend it can. That honesty is kind of the whole point of the project.
What I'd love from you:
I've been building an F1 stats and analysis web app on my own, and it's at the point where I need other eyes on it. It's completely free, no ads, no signup, no catch — I'm not trying to sell anything, I just want honest feedback before I keep building.
What it does right now:
One thing I care about: everything is derived from real data, and I've tried hard not to fake precision or guess. If the data can't tell you why a lap was slow, I don't pretend it can. That honesty is kind of the whole point of the project.
What I'd love from you:
With all the (deserved) noise about the yellow flags and Verstappen's crash in Q3, I wanted to look at something cleaner: I pulled the car-by-car telemetry from two of their earlier flying laps in Austria — Antonelli's 1:06.414 and Verstappen's 1:06.475 — and compared how each driver actually drove the lap. They're separated by just 0.061s, but they get there in almost opposite ways.
Antonelli — carries speed through the corners. He's up in sector 1 (+0.06) and sector 2 (+0.13), with a notably higher minimum speed through the slow corners (70 vs 67 km/h) and higher intermediate speeds. Classic momentum driving — keep the car rolling, don't scrub speed on entry.
Verstappen — point and shoot. He claws it all back and more in sector 3 (+0.26), runs a higher top speed (331 vs 330), and set the outright-fastest time in more micro-sectors (9 vs 7). More aggression on entry and traction, trading mid-corner speed for a better drive out and higher terminal speed.
Two of the most talked-about drivers on the grid, effectively dead level on the same tyres and track — but one is flowing the car through the corners and the other is squaring them off and firing out. Neither is "right"; they're just different philosophies landing on nearly the same lap time.
On the data, since I know it'll come up: the sector times and speeds are exact from timing data. The "who's faster where" split I've broken into corners and straights and averaged the speed through each, so it shows trends rather than pretending to metre-perfect precision. And to be clear — these aren't the final Q3 laps (that session got decided by the crash and the yellows), so this is purely a driving-style comparison of two clean laps, not a claim about who "should" have been ahead.
Which style do you back over a full stint — Antonelli's corner speed, or Verstappen's exits and top speed?
Red Bull weren't exactly thrilled getting tagged as the team with the strongest engine this year. Might've just been the truth.
Hadjar was 0.175s up on Hamilton in Melbourne — and it's the straights doing the damage. +15 km/h through IS1, +5 through IS2, +9 at the speed trap, +7 top speed. That's not a corner-exit trick, that's raw power.
Track map shows it too — Hadjar's ahead for 35% of the lap, mostly through the long runs. Hamilton's still the sharper driver through the technical stuff, that hairpin and the final corner are all him.
Complain about the engine deficit all you want, Red Bull. The data's saying what everyone already suspected.
Each horizontal strip is one driver's whole season so far. Each pixel in that strip is a single racing lap, coloured by how that lap was run:
🟣 their fastest lap of the race · 🟢 strong lap (near their own best pace) · 🔵 normal racing lap · 🟡 off-pace lap · ⚫ pit in/out lap · ⚪ neutralised (Safety Car / VSC) · 🔴 retired
Drivers are ordered top-to-bottom by raw race pace, so you can read the whole grid at a glance — the front-runners carry far more green, and you can spot exactly where someone's race unravelled (the red).
On the methodology, because someone will (rightly) ask: every single category is derived from real lap timing data. The one thing I deliberately refused to do was guess intent. A slow lap is just labelled "off-pace" — I don't dress it up as "tyre management" or "traffic," because that's not in the data and I'd only be guessing. "Retired" comes from the official classification, not me eyeballing where the laps stop. "Neutralised" is detected from the whole field slowing at once, not assumed. I'd rather it be something you can trust than something that looks clever but invents detail.
It's pulled from public timing data and rendered with a tool I've been building. ~9,900 laps in this one image.
If this is interesting, what would you want mapped next — a single driver's entire career this way? Two title rivals' seasons side by side? Open to ideas.
Looking ahead to the race at Silverstone this weekend, thought I would take peak at the top performers across both the race and qualifying. What are your predictions for the British Grand Prix?
I have also attached the Q3 lap telemetry for George and Lewis to see how they both attack the lap differently if anyone is interested.
Seems to be a track record (no pun intended) of British drivers doing well at Silverstone so can it be an all British podium for the second time this season?
2 of the most dominant seasons in recent history, here's what the stats say. Have used a tool to pull statistical comparison of Max in 2023 with Lewis in 2020 as well as where the cars rank all time in terms of dominance. Interested to hear what you think and whether these rankings are justified?
Based on sheer number of laps, I would say so although a lot of this comes down to car reliability, also forgot Perez had his car blow up so ignore that number, Cadillac and consistency should not go in the same sentence!
Welcome to ApexF1
This is a community for F1fans who love the numbers behind the racing. We're excited to have you join us!
What to Post
Post anything that you think the community would find interesting, helpful, or inspiring. Feel free to share your thoughts, photos, or questions about Live timing, race analysis, telemetry, strategy, statistics, engineering insights, and discussion across Formula 1.
Community Vibe
We're all about being friendly, constructive, and inclusive. Let's build a space where everyone feels comfortable sharing and connecting.
How to Get Started
Thanks for being part of the very first wave. Together, let's make r/ApexF1 amazing.
I've been working on a web app for digging into F1 data — head-to-head driver comparisons, car-adjusted skill ratings, constructor dominance across eras, track records, and lap telemetry. It's free, no ads, just something I made because I wanted it to exist.
It's early and rough in places, and I'd genuinely value feedback from hardcore fans on what's useful, what's missing, and what you'd want next — that's what'll shape where it goes. Happy to share the link with anyone interested (didn't want to drop it in the post in case that's against the rules here).
What stats or comparisons do you wish existing F1 sites let you do?
Still in the build phase and could use some feedback from F1 fans on the current features and what else they would like to see. If you are interested please comment below :)
After George's controversial pole lap this weekend thought I would pull the telemetry to take look at whether he actually did 'lift' or not and how much when going through the yellow flag.
From the throttle graph, there does look to be a slightly earlier lift in the latter part of the lap when compared with one of Max's push laps however all other graphs look to be pretty similar.
Would be interested to hear what people think from someone who is able to read these better than me?
I pulled the lap telemetry for the Verstappen–Russell fight at Austria and compared three laps across the race — a clean mid-stint lap (36), a lap going into the stops (43), and a late-stint lap (60). Wanted to see *where* VER's advantage actually lived, because on the timing screens it looked closer than the result suggested.
Clean-lap comparison (same phase of race, comparable tyres):
- Lap 36: VER 1:11.931 vs RUS 1:12.715 — VER ~0.78s up
- Lap 60: VER 1:10.900 vs RUS 1:11.361 — VER ~0.46s up
What surprised me is how *similar* the traces are. Overlaying speed, throttle, brake and gear, they're almost on top of each other for most of the lap — same braking points, same minimum speeds. VER's gain doesn't come from one standout corner; it's a series of tiny margins, mostly getting back to full throttle a fraction earlier on corner exit (most visible in the final sector) and slightly different gear timing. Death by a thousand cuts rather than one knockout.
The lap-43 caveat (being upfront): the gap there looks like ~4s, but it's almost certainly not pace — RUS's speed and gear collapse entirely in the final ~25% of the lap (gear drops to 1, speed falls off a cliff), which reads as an in-lap to the pits rather than VER suddenly being 4s quicker. So I'm treating 43 as a strategy artefact, not a pace comparison. Worth flagging because raw lap-time deltas around the stops are misleading.
[There was also a [SAFETY CAR / VSC / pit wave] around lap 25 that bunched things up — context for the stint structure.]
What I can't tell from the traces alone, and I'm curious what people think: is that ~0.5–0.8s clean-lap edge mostly car, mostly tyre state on the lap I sampled, or genuinely VER extracting more on corner exit? The throttle traces *look* like a traction/driving-style difference, but I'd love a second opinion from people who read these better than me.
Charts are speed/throttle/brake/gear, aligned by % of lap (so the two laps line up start-to-finish even though they're different durations). Data from OpenF1. — happy to use my tool to pull other laps or drivers if anyone wants a specific comparison.
Where do you think the clean-lap gap actually comes from — traction, tyre deg, or just sampling?