Why do people bellitle and antagonize the use of A.I in writing? With it you can be writing texts that are more neutral, logical and informative. Instead people treat human writing, full of logical flaws and bias as superior.
It is already somewhat accepted in programing and coding that people will use A.I to accelerate their work. But in other areas of knowlodge is seen as “dumb” to use A.I.
Even seeing people saying “A.I” causes damages to people’s brain, like drugs or deceases don’t already exist and do that. Since i debate with A.I i expanded my understanding of many topics, not professionaly, but well enough to not be misinformed.
I had a discussion with a redditor, and i just got pissed when he accused me of A.I
I literally wrote the text myself, but i did use A.I to correct the arguments and grammar flaws. I checked the information to be truthful, spend a whole hour writing it… but it doesn’t matter how logical it sounds, just that there was A.I and i’m dumb for using it.
It pissed me off so i deleted all my comments as i saw as waste of time, even though i had many upvotes and people agreed to me, but this pseudo-intelectual thinks hes argument full of literary jargons is more logical because of human feelings.
What are good answers to when a person accuses you of using A.I? Does using A.I makes a text poorer even when well written with effort?
Just want to know what is the common opinion among people in this community.
Thanks.