I mapped who actually owns the wind farms off the North East coast. The numbers are absurd.
▲ 105 r/Aberdeen

I mapped who actually owns the wind farms off the North East coast. The numbers are absurd.

Ok, trying to wrap my head around this: I was looking over the offshore wind farms off the coast of the North East and we are massively losing out. We've got loads of offshore wind farms, most of them owned by other countries' governments. Meanwhile, our councils are facing multi-million pounds budget holes, reduced public services, etc. If the Scottish Government took even a small equity stake, say 20%, we'd be making some serious money.

This whole thing has got me feeling kinda:

https://preview.redd.it/fuwcv185evsh1.jpg?width=1000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cc6a52d394c6f42dd8ec2b13ae242347d8bd75df

Anyways, I broke the offshore wind farms down and tried to figure out how much money we were losing out to private/other state interests. The most readily available figures are over the lifetime (20 or 30 years) of the wind farm

Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm - Owned by Vattenfall, that's Sweden's state energy company.
Estimated Lifetime Net Profit (25-30 Yrs): £120m - £200m

Hywind Scotland -The world’s first floating wind farm! It's Majority-owned by Equinor (67% owned by the Norwegian State) and Masdar (state-owned energy company of Abu Dhabi).
Estimated Lifetime Net Profit (25-30 Yrs): £60m- £110m

Moray East & Moray West - Co-owned by Ocean Winds, owned by ENGIE (majority owned by the french gov) and Ignitis Group (the Lithuanian State-controlled energy company).
Moray East: Estimated Lifetime Net Profit (25-30 Yrs): £1.2bn - £1.8bn
Moray West: Estimated Lifetime Net Profit (25-30 Yrs): £1.1bn - £1.6bn

Kincardine Offshore Wind Farm - owned by multinational conglomerate Cobra Group (a bad ass name)
Estimated Lifetime Net Profit (25-30 Yrs): £100m - £160m

Seagreen -Co-owned by SSE (British Multinational) and TotalEnergies (another multinational with shareholders like BlackRock and Vanguard.
Estimated lifetime Net Profit (20- 30 Yrs): £1.3bn - £1.9bn

Overall, that's £3.88 billion - £5.77 billion in total over the lifetime of these profits. A 20% stake would give us something like £776m - £1.15bn and that's just for these projects here in the North east!

**TL;DR:** Foreign governments and big multinationals are set to clear between £3.88bn and £5.77bn in net profits from North East wind farms over their lifespans. Meanwhile, our local councils are skint. Taking a 20% public stake would keep at least £800m-ish in Scottish public hands. Why aren't ScotGov doing this?

reddit.com
u/Historical-Count9051 — 14 days ago
▲ 11 r/MarineEngineering+2 crossposts

Do you work offshore in Scotland? Can you give me some input?

Hiya, my pal Mike's worked offshore in the North Sea for 12 years, and he's been pushing DESNZ to invest in a proper jobs service for North Sea workers looking to transition to other industries.

DESNZ have taken it on board and they’re actually building the service, but Mike found out in a meeting with them that they haven't actually spoken to any North Sea workers about what they'd need from it. So he's put together a quick survey to make sure workers actually get a say before this thing gets built without them.

It takes about 5 minutes, it's anonymous, your response will only be used to inform DESNZ. No need to say who you work for.

If you work offshore in the North Sea, would you mind giving it a go? Or if you know someone who does, feel free to pass it along.

smartsurvey.co.uk
u/Historical-Count9051 — 2 months ago

Whitelee Windfarm, which is built on FLS land, is being repowered soon. Why are we letting a Spanish company (Iberdrola) make so much money on public land?

bbc.co.uk
u/Historical-Count9051 — 3 months ago
▲ 389 r/Scotland

TIL about Tom Johnston, the Scottish politician who used renewable energy to electrify the highlands

I've been really interested in energy in Scotland lately and came across a figure I think a lot of people here would find interesting, especially given all the talk about oil and gas and renewables in the last few days.

Tom Johnston was Secretary of State for Scotland during WWII. The guy was a total legend.

Back in the 1940s, the Scottish Highlands were in a bad way. Depopulation and poverty were rampant. In 1945 only half of all homes in the Highlands had mains electricity.

Johnston changed that by launching a campaign to harness Scotland's water and create massive hydro-electric dams.

He pushed through the Hydro-Electric Development (Scotland) Act in 1943 and set up the North of Scotland Hyrdro-Electric baord. Something really interesting about this was that the goal wasn't just to turn a profit, but to serve people in the highlands. Unlike other hydro-electric projects, ordinary consumers would have priority. Surplus energy was sold off to the grid and the profits were used to help offset distribution costs and to rebuild the highlands.

Over 30 years, the hydro board built 78 dams, the Loch Sloy Dam, up by Loch Lomond was one of them. By 1960, they had connected 90% of the Highlands to the grid

At a time when we're constantly worrying about electricity and energy in Scotland, it's nice to find some examples of people who did something interesting that actually helped people!

u/Historical-Count9051 — 3 months ago
▲ 309 r/Scotland+1 crossposts

Genuine question: There are wind turbines everywhere in Scotland. Denmark has 66% community-owned wind. We have <1%. Are our politicians just not interested, or is there something else?

Was just reading about how Denmark does community energy and it got me thinking about all of the turbines here.

Over there, local towns and co-ops actually own the majority of onshore wind turbines. They get the income and they actually want more turbines because it means more cash for their communities.

Meanwhile, in Scotland, we've got turbines popping up everywhere, but less than 1% are community-owned. The profits are heading straight to overseas investors or big utility companies. I looked up what my town gets in community benefits from the wind farm nearby and it is laughably little.

People are always talking about the transition, but why aren't we seeing this happen on the ground?

Is it a funding issue? Is there a specific legal barrier or planning rule that makes it impossible for communities to compete with big developers? Or are politicians just not pushing for it because it's easier to hand leases to the big guys?

Genuinely curious. Orkney and a few other places seem to manage it, so what's stopping the rest of us?

Edit: Cheers for all the replies – (mostly) useful stuff. A few take aways

-As it turns our wind turbines are expensive! but maybe GB energy has money for this?

-The Scottish government goofed on Scotwind. They could have required public stakes but didn't. They should do next time

-Danes are built different. Cultural and financial differences abound!

A few people asked about organisations working on this

Community Energy Scotland – support groups trying to get projects off the ground.

Our Power – campaign pushing for public stakes in offshore wind

Fuel Poverty Action – local organising around energy justice

Glasgow Community energy - you can become a member. It looks like they do a lot of solar installs.

Edinburgh Solar Coop - you can buy shares from time to time to help them expand.

u/Historical-Count9051 — 3 months ago
▲ 1.3k r/SolarpunkTech+1 crossposts

Solarpunk Reality Check: Update on the bio-receptive "green bricks" one year later. (Spoiler: Not dead, just complicated)

Hey everyone! A while ago I shared an update here about the Swiss solar-rail project and how it holds up in real life. You guys loved the reality check, so today let’s look at another viral Solarpunk darling from about a year ago: The Dutch Bio-receptive Moss Bricks (spearheaded mostly by TU Delft and the startup Respyre).

The viral videos promised us cities where concrete walls magically turn into self-sustaining, lush green vertical forests using nothing but rainwater.

One year later, the initial internet hype has cleared, and the engineering reality has set in. Here is the actual status of the project:

  1. The "Moss doesn't just spawn" bottleneck

In the lab, it looked easy. In the real world, city smog, heavy wind, and intense UV rays mean that moss won't just grow on these bricks naturally from spores in the air.

The fix: They found out they have to pre-grow the moss in indoor climate labs for about 6 weeks before shipping the bricks to construction sites.

The reality: Right now, there is zero industrial supply chain for "living bricks." It adds months of delay to construction logistics.

  1. The 3-Month Blanket Problem

You can't just put these pre-grown bricks under the sun immediately. Current field protocols require that once the wall is built, it must be covered with a special light-blocking textile for 3 months. This acts as a shield to help the lab-grown moss acclimatize to the harsh outside world. As you can imagine, contractors aren't thrilled about covering new buildings in giant blankets for a quarter of a year.

  1. The Seasonal "Ugly Phase" 🍂

Instagram showed us vibrant, neon-green walls. Reality showed us that during dry summers, the moss goes into a dormant state, turning a patchy, brownish-yellow color. It only looks truly "Solarpunk" during wet autumns and springs.

The Good News: It actually cools!

It’s not all bad. The pilot walls (like the ones in Leiden and university campuses) proved the physics right:

  • The walls are 5–7°C cooler than traditional concrete during heatwaves.
  • They actually absorb massive amounts of particulate matter (urban dust).
  • Structure testing proved that the internal wall stays dry—the moss root-acids do not destroy the core building structure.

Conclusion: Where are we now?

The project did not fail, but it is officially out of its "residential house" phase. It is currently in an extended pilot phase (2025–2028). Instead of apartment buildings, they are shifting focus to urban infrastructure where aesthetics and construction speed matter less: highway sound barriers, retaining walls, and public bus stops.

It’s a classic Solarpunk lesson: turning our cities green is a slow, grueling battle of biochemistry and supply chains, not a 30-second TikTok miracle.

What do you think? Is a 3-month blanketed wall and brown summer moss a fair price to pay for a 6-degree cooler building?

Link: https://parametric-architecture.com/respyres-moss-facades-in-architecture/

u/GeorgeRobertVitkos — 3 months ago
▲ 3 r/TikTok

No views on new videos

Hey folks, I've been running into a problem with my account recently. I've been posting really consistently for about 3 months. Nothing spammy, just posting! Mostly it's all talking to camera kind of videos. My videos averaged 500-2000 views.

Since about 2 weeks ago any new video I post is getting 0 views. I'm editing videos in app, interacting with others, actually using the app! I imagine that means I'm in tiktok jail for some reason, but honestly I can't figure out why. Anyone out there deal with anything similar?

reddit.com
u/Historical-Count9051 — 4 months ago

Welcome! Stay punk.🍃☀️

Welcome to r/SolarpunkTech

Hello and welcome to the nerd and punks alike!

This is a space to explore the hopeful, sustainable future where technology serves people and the planet, not corporations. As defined in the solarpunk ethos, we envision a world built on principles of sustainability, social justice, and collective action and the tech that makes all of that possible.

What does that mean for this community?

We're interested in the "punk" side of technology: the DIY ethos, small-scale, but big impact, repurposing, and bricolage. A solarpunk technology can be a high-tech energy grid or a cleverly adapted low-tech solution: think think things like heat networks, community-owned energy, or whatever else you can imagine.

What we welcome:

Repurposing: Sharing projects that keep old tech out of landfills.

Sustainable Design: Showcasing eco-friendly innovations, from wearables to architecture.

Permacomputing: Discussions on low-energy, long-lasting, and accessible computing.

Community Solutions: Tech that empowers local resilience and food sovereignty.

Hopeful & Constructive Ideas: We keep it positive and focus on solutions, not doomerism. But critique and realism is important!

A note on our culture:
We embrace the inclusive, anti-fascist, and optimistic spirit of solarpunk. We're here to build each other up, and while we respect diverse views, all discussions should be civil and focused on creating a better, brighter future.

Post your projects, ask your questions, and help us build a world that's both technologically advanced and deeply in harmony with nature.

reddit.com
u/Historical-Count9051 — 4 months ago
▲ 136 r/SolarpunkTech+1 crossposts

The Power Shift: Lessons from communities already making renewables work for them

Generally speaking, people give renewables too much of a free pass. Most of them are owned by huge international corporations, some by fossil fuel companies! Renewables are great, but the decentralised nature means that they could be generating electricity and money for towns everywhere.

scottishbeacon.com
u/Historical-Count9051 — 4 months ago

this has to stop it's too hot

i dont agree about shutting the north sea but it's too fucking hot, what's gonna happen to england when its 40 degrees and we cant water the grass

reddit.com
u/Historical-Count9051 — 4 months ago