u/Impossible-Bet-1934

I'm trying to decide between three OLEDs:

LG G6 77"

Samsung S95H 77"

Samsung S95F 83"

The G6 and S95H are essentially the same price, while the 83" S95F is around 37% less.

I previously had a 77" Samsung S90F WOLED (EU version) but wasn't particularly impressed with its brightness or colour punch. I'd previously seen a smaller QD-OLED S90F and found the colours noticeably richer and more vibrant.

My room gets a decent amount of daylight and my viewing distance is around 10.5 ft / 3.2m. Realistically, I'll mostly be watching SDR content during the daytime, with movies and gaming more towards the evening/night, so good SDR/daytime performance is quite important to me.

The G6 appeals because of its Primary RGB Tandem OLED panel, high brightness including larger bright areas, Dolby Vision and 5-year panel warranty. From reviews, it seems LG has closed much of the gap to QD-OLED in colour performance while offering exceptional overall brightness.

The S95H (EU non-bezel version, not the S99H) appeals because it's QD-OLED, which should give me the higher saturated colour brightness/volume I felt was missing from my S90F WOLED.

The 83" S95F is tempting because it's around 37% less while giving roughly 16% more screen area. However, it uses Tandem WOLED rather than QD-OLED. I know it's considerably higher performance than the conventional WOLED in my old S90F, but I'm wondering whether I'd still miss the extra colour punch of QD-OLED.

I'm also unsure about Samsung's matte/Glare Free coating versus the more traditional glossy appearance of the G6. Reflections matter in my room, but so do perceived blacks, contrast and clarity. I've seen the G6 in person but haven't seen either Samsung.

Which would you choose for this usage: the larger and considerably cheaper 83" S95F, the G6 for its brightness/all-round picture quality, or the S95H for QD-OLED colour punch?

I'm trying to decide between three OLEDs:

LG G6 77" — new

Samsung S95H 77" — new

Samsung S95F 83" — used once

The G6 and S95H are essentially the same price, while the 83" S95F is around 37% less.

I previously had a 77" Samsung S90F WOLED (EU version) but wasn't particularly impressed with its brightness or colour punch. I'd previously seen a smaller QD-OLED S90F and found the colours noticeably richer and more vibrant.

My room gets a decent amount of daylight and my viewing distance is around 10.5 ft / 3.2m. Realistically, I'll mostly be watching SDR content during the daytime, with movies and gaming more towards the evening/night, so good SDR/daytime performance is quite important to me.

The G6 appeals because of its Primary RGB Tandem OLED panel, high brightness including larger bright areas, Dolby Vision and 5-year panel warranty. From reviews, it seems LG has closed much of the gap to QD-OLED in colour performance while offering exceptional overall brightness.

The S95H (EU non-bezel version, not the S99H) appeals because it's QD-OLED, which should give me the higher saturated colour brightness/volume I felt was missing from my S90F WOLED.

The 83" S95F is tempting because it's around 37% less while giving roughly 16% more screen area. However, it uses Tandem WOLED rather than QD-OLED. I know it's considerably higher performance than the conventional WOLED in my old S90F, but I'm wondering whether I'd still miss the extra colour punch of QD-OLED.

I'm also unsure about Samsung's matte/Glare Free coating versus the more traditional glossy appearance of the G6. Reflections matter in my room, but so do perceived blacks, contrast and clarity. I've seen the G6 in person but haven't seen either Samsung.

Which would you choose for this usage: the larger and considerably cheaper 83" S95F, the G6 for its brightness/all-round picture quality, or the S95H for QD-OLED colour punch?

I'm trying to decide between three OLEDs:

LG G6 77" — new

Samsung S95H 77" — new

Samsung S95F 83" — used once

The G6 and S95H are essentially the same price, while the 83" S95F is around 37% less.

I previously had a 77" Samsung S90F WOLED (EU version) but wasn't particularly impressed with its brightness or colour punch.

My room gets a decent amount of daylight and my viewing distance is around 10.5 ft / 3.2m. Realistically, I'll mostly be watching SDR content during the daytime, with movies and gaming more towards the evening/night.

The G6 appeals because of its Primary RGB Tandem OLED panel, high brightness including larger bright areas, Dolby Vision and 5-year panel warranty. From reviews, it seems LG has closed much of the gap to QD-OLED in colour performance while offering exceptional overall brightness.

The S95H (EU non-bezel version, not the S99H) appeals because it's QD-OLED, which should give me the higher saturated colour brightness/volume I felt was missing from my S90F WOLED.

The 83" S95F is tempting because it's around 37% less while giving roughly 16% more screen area. However, it uses Tandem WOLED rather than QD-OLED. I know it's considerably higher performance than the conventional WOLED in my old S90F but I'm wondering whether I'd still miss the extra colour punch of QD-OLED.

I'm also unsure about Samsung's matte/Glare Free coating versus the more traditional glossy appearance of the G6. Reflections matter in my room, but so do perceived blacks, contrast and clarity. I've seen the G6 in person but haven't seen either Samsung.

Which would you choose for this usage: the larger and cheaper 83" S95F, the G6 for its perhaps all-round picture quality or the S95H for QD-OLED colour punch?