If a species of weasel lost its mammary glands would it still be a mammal?
This is following up on the discussion by Will Duffy and Gutsick Gibbon on the following video https://www.youtube.com/live/apW16s2kJwg?is=pJidxzlKcIm1I5pe about whether snakes are tetrapods.
It's pretty much definitional sophistry in my opinion, and in no way invalidates evolution but it seems like Will was getting stuck on turtles and birds and snakes.
But as a thought experiment, imagine a weasel species started feeding its babies regurgitated flesh instead of milk. Imagine it lost its mammary gland function. Not a big evolutionary change. Not a "body plan" change. But now mammal != mammary!!! Does this make the barf-weasel not a mammal? Does it mean we need to rename the clade to something like hirsutia? Does it invalidate the theory of evolution?
Note: I'm trying to represent someone else's argument with a thought experiment. The argument to me seems prima facie nonsense, and I hope the thought experiment makes it clear why. It seems like Will was trying to say "phenetics makes more sense than cladistics, and classification should be based on single diagnostic traits"