u/Just_Lingonberry_352

I am finding it is significantly degraded in performance. I am starting a new context too for basic UI work. We have been stuck with very simple CSS issues, and I know codex is bad at UI but the issue is that it keeps claiming that it fixed something but when I inspect the code, it hasn't done any of that. It keeps flagging conversations as cybersecurity risk when we are just fiddling with strictly UI terminology.

• likely around mid-to-late June

• It will become Google's new flagship SOTA model focused heavily on coding, agents, reasoning, and memory

• Pricing will stay close to Gemini 3.1 Pro or around 1.5x higher

• It won't be a Mythos-style model, but more in the GPT-5.5 / Claude Opus 4.7

• It also heavily focused on grounding + search reliability to reduce hallucinations in real world usage

• Expected faster responses than Gemini 3.1 Pro with much stronger long-horizon agentic workflows

Not sure what is going on but an hour ago I had 80% usage after the reset 24 hours ago but now it seems like the reset was revoked, I am seeing 0% weekly usage limit and my credits have been drained.

I am contacting the OpenAI support and will find out more details.

update: they are investigating usage sync issue!

I received 900 credits

I used gpt 5.5 high

gone in less than an hour

I actually couldn't believe it thought this was some error ?

refreshed the browser a few times and indeed gpt 5.5 high ran through it all doing a ton of calls and writes. These are supposedly 3x what API charges but there is almost no good reason to spend your money on credits

biggest problem with GPT 5.5 is how ridiculously long it takes to respond even on medium.

the leap from 5.4 to 5.5 isn't too big either so we have a more expensensive but more efficient but still extremely slow model

if the rumors are true and gemini ships 3.2 flash it could have a big leg up because even if you take 2~3 promps vs what it takes 1 prompt for GPT 5.5 that takes a long time

I'm always going to prefer the one that responds quicker.

I am finding more often that 5.5 misses details and will inform you that it has completed the task. This is very reminiscent of the 5.1 days where it would outright just lie about completing some task.

I wonder if anybody else is coming across this issue, honestly I'm a bit flabbergasted that this old trait has come back, wonder if there is any mitigation around it.

It started happening a while ago, not sure if this has to do with the restraint of contexts but the same old small context and compaction is issue from the 5.1 days appear to be back at least from my extensive usage.

but mine was about to reset tomorrow anyway.....

before we had ai code gen flet had a good proposition using python abstractions vs dart

but now there is no barrier to just producing good quality dart code

this is where I feel flet loses its relevance