My writing was rejected for not being woke
I wrote a storyline focused on aesthetics and the human experience and intentionally stayed away from mentioning race, gender, the lgbbq community and pronouns because a novel about people who are brown or women who munch cookies can not at all be aesthetic. So you know just being apolitical by avoiding specific political ideologies that I don't like. Anwyay, even though I have never read contemporary literature and can't really tell you one book that I found to be too "woke" and what I mean by woke, I am pretty sure that my work was better than all that pronouned contemporary crap. I know that I can write better than Chimamanda Adichie, Jhumpa Lahiri and Kazuo Ishugoro because well, I write like Chaucer! And just so you know I'm not racist, I also wouldn't read Ian McEwan-he's too experiemental-writing about unborn fetuses and updating classics. And don't forget he wrote a novel set during a war! Why write about war? To be political? The human condition ceases ot exist in war time after all.
I just feel like the problem isn't that I don't engage with literature outside of narrow ideological labels like "woke" or, engage with it on its own merit regardless of the race or identity of the author-I think the problem is with publishing and its obsession with idenity politics.
How are us apolitical writer's going to survive? How can we rescue modern literature from the likes of Han Kang. How have we fallen so far? Literature used to be so full of talented figures like myself.