Review omnipod vs medtrum nano (in combination with AAPS)

Review omnipod vs medtrum nano (in combination with AAPS)

https://preview.redd.it/bgi43j0nzyjh1.png?width=1408&format=png&auto=webp&s=3379aeba1dff54534f3742726aab449a28811a4b

Here is my personal review comparing the Medtrum Nano and the Omnipod. Since I used AndroidAPS (AAPS) for both systems, this is strictly a hardware comparison. I can't comment on either manufacturer's official looping algorithms. I also paired them with a Libre 3, so I have no experience with their native CGMs.

Why the Medtrum Nano Wins for Me

  • No Tunneling or Leaking: With the Omnipod, I constantly dealt with insulin leaking back out of the infusion site. With the Nano, this is completely gone, no matter where I wear it.
  • The Steel Needle is a Game Changer: I was skeptical, but you don't feel the steel needle at all, neither during insertion nor while wearing it. It is significantly thinner than the Omnipod's Teflon cannula. I measured the Nano needle at 0.12 inches (0.3 cm) compared to the Omnipod's 0.28 inches (0.7 cm), making the Nano needle about 57% thinner, which makes a massive difference in comfort.
  • Pre-filling Capability: You can actually pre-fill the Nano pods ahead of time, which makes a quick change on the go much easier.
  • Size Matters: The pump is exactly 50% smaller in volume compared to the Omnipod. It feels incredibly discreet and lightweight.
  • Extended Wear Time: Using it with AAPS, I can easily stretch the wear time up to 5 days, making it much more economical and less wasteful.

The Downsides

  • Complex Filling Process: Setting up and filling the Nano is definitely a bit more tedious and takes more steps than the straightforward Omnipod fill.
  • Adhesive Residue: The glue they use is stubborn. It stays stuck to the skin well, but it leaves annoying black sticky residue behind after you peel it off.

Overall, the hardware advantages of the Nano—especially the steel needle and the tiny footprint—make it the clear winner for me over the Omnipod. It's so much better in daily use.

Pictures is ai generated for visibility. This is no advertisement, just my personal review.

reddit.com
u/Late-Thought-2327 — 3 days ago
▲ 154 r/S21Ultra

No Reason to Upgrade: Staying with the S21 Ultra

I’m sticking with my S21 Ultra for as long as it lasts. In about a year, I plan to have the battery replaced directly by Samsung to ensure I get an original part and maintain the water resistance. ​The smartphone market has hit a plateau—there are simply no meaningful, real-world upgrades in newer models that I would actually notice day-to-day. ​While the end of security updates isn't ideal, it's not a dealbreaker for me, especially since I only download apps and content from trusted sources.

u/Late-Thought-2327 — 9 days ago
▲ 8 r/Omnipod+1 crossposts

Review omnipod vs medtrum nano (in combination with AAPS)

Here is my personal review comparing the Medtrum Nano and the Omnipod. Since I used AndroidAPS (AAPS) for both systems, this is strictly a hardware comparison. I can't comment on either manufacturer's official looping algorithms. I also paired them with a Libre 3, so I have no experience with their native CGMs.

Why the Medtrum Nano Wins for Me

  • No Tunneling or Leaking: With the Omnipod, I constantly dealt with insulin leaking back out of the infusion site. With the Nano, this is completely gone, no matter where I wear it.
  • The Steel Needle is a Game Changer: I was skeptical, but you don't feel the steel needle at all, neither during insertion nor while wearing it. It is significantly thinner than the Omnipod's Teflon cannula. I measured the Nano needle at 0.12 inches (0.3 cm) compared to the Omnipod's 0.28 inches (0.7 cm), making the Nano needle about 57% thinner, which makes a massive difference in comfort.
  • Pre-filling Capability: You can actually pre-fill the Nano pods ahead of time, which makes a quick change on the go much easier.
  • Size Matters: The pump is exactly 50% smaller in volume compared to the Omnipod. It feels incredibly discreet and lightweight.
  • Extended Wear Time: Using it with AAPS, I can easily stretch the wear time up to 5 days, making it much more economical and less wasteful.

The Downsides

  • Complex Filling Process: Setting up and filling the Nano is definitely a bit more tedious and takes more steps than the straightforward Omnipod fill.
  • Adhesive Residue: The glue they use is stubborn. It stays stuck to the skin well, but it leaves annoying black sticky residue behind after you peel it off. Overall, the hardware advantages of the Nano—especially the steel needle and the tiny footprint—make it the clear winner for me over the Omnipod. It's so much better in daily use.

Pictures is ai generated for visibility. This is no advertisement, just my personal review. https://i.imgur.com/7SqtJYa.png

u/Late-Thought-2327 — 1 month ago
▲ 3 r/GlInet

Using the GL.iNet GL-B3000 (Marmor) as a travel router?

Hi everyone, I can get the following routers both for 40€

GL.iNet GL-B3000 (Marmor)

GL.iNet GL-SFT1200 (Opal)

The Marmor looks newer and ha better hardware and is not that much bigger.

The main purpose is to use it as a travel router for hotels to bypass the captive portals for my wifi Babyphone.

Does the opal has specific features to bypass these login portals? Or should I take the Marmor because it's just better hardware and basically the same features/software.

reddit.com
u/Late-Thought-2327 — 2 months ago