[WI] Going into trial blind with almost no evidence
My ex is forcing trial against the GAL and custody study recommendations. The children have done the GAL schedule over a year and said they do not want it to change. The investigators were fully aligned on a 65/35 schedule. That was solidified by ongoing issues, not just historical ones and also highlighted ongoing concern with 30-50 minute commute my ex created from the kids school, activities, and community. While I requested increase in time during studies, I am aligning with the GAL, study, kids, and status quo for trial. My ex is demanding 50/50.
I provided extensive documentation to the GAL and investigator. It resulted in a 30 page document that my lawyer said is very scathing towards my ex. However, it was sealed to attorney and judge eyes only due to the contents. I did report emotional abuse of the children, but not being able to read the single biggest piece of evidence that judge will examine is hard.
My lawyer said this judge has a very low tolerance for parents going back and forth with text. She basically checks out and won't even listen. His plan is to focus on few big things of the commute, stability with me as primary caregiver, and children's wishes.
My ex and his lawyer mostly have focused on attacking me and saying any issues raised about him don't exist. I always have evidence for the GAL, so most of his issues have just fizzled out. Yet, I feel very exposed just trying I don't need much to defend myself from whatever they try to pull at trial. Is it common when you side with the third party professionals to largely rely on their recommendations? What if my ex somehow discredits both?