u/MarchMan86

This might be a sensitive topic, but I can't help but feel that part of why the Rugrats crew legally cannot discuss details of the fallout with Paul Germain's creative leadership is because it led to Arlene Klasky and Gabor Csupo splitting up during that time period.

For the tensions leading up to it, it was mainly centered on Paul Germain pushing for sharper storytelling among the Rugrats characters, while Arlene Klasky wanted something softer. Gabor Csupo was said to have been the middle man in this storm, often siding with Germain. In the end, the first three seasons of Rugrats blossomed into something beautiful by the end of its initial run, yet can only imagine the awkward conversations this led to between husband and wife.

Not to mention, their divorce likely caused a lot of uncertainty about how the studio would be run from then on.

Any more details behind this?

This might be a sensitive topic, but I can't help but feel that part of why the Rugrats crew legally cannot discuss details of the fallout with Paul Germain's creative leadership is because it led to Arlene Klasky and Gabor Csupo splitting up during that time period.

For the tensions leading up to it, it was mainly centered on Paul Germain pushing for sharper storytelling among the Rugrats characters, while Arlene Klasky wanted something softer. Gabor Csupo was said to have been the middle man in this storm, often siding with Germain. In the end, the first three seasons of Rugrats blossomed into something beautiful by the end of its initial run, yet can only imagine the awkward conversations this led to between husband and wife.

Not to mention, their divorce likely caused a lot of uncertainty about how the studio would be run from then on.

Any more details behind this?

This was in the years after the original show ended. After it was removed from the SNICK lineup, Ren & Stimpy was still seen regularly on both Nickelodeon and MTV during 1996. This included the premiere of the banned Games episode, "Sammy & Me/The Last Temptation of Ren" in October of that year.

Then in 1997, MTV stopped airing repeats. Nickelodeon would then restrict R&S to only airing on weekends, and they were quietly left out of Nicktoons commercials.

1998, R&S was still airing on weekends. But they weren't being actively advertised. And they were usually dead last in any Nicktoons lineup, or not featured at all. They barely showed up in the annual Nicktoons Thanksgiving marathon.

Then in 1999, Ren & Stimpy was gone. Aside from appearing in a marathon celebrating Nickelodeon's 20th anniversary, it was the only Nicktoon at the time that was not airing anymore.

This was around the time Nick started pushing their newer Nicktoons, maybe presuming that kids would be too distracted to notice if one show went missing. Well, by summer of 2000, they (reluctantly) brought repeats back by popular demand. This included the unannounced premiere of "Sammy & Me/The Last Temptation of Ren".

It was an odd period, where Nickelodeon tried to forget one of their first breakout hits, only for that attempt to create an (ill-fated) revival.

Anyone else remember?

Thank you for contacting the Office of the California Attorney General regarding your hacked or disabled social media account.

We regret that we cannot provide you with direct assistance in restoring access to your account. Our office is prohibited by law from representing individual consumers in legal matters. We do, within the limits of our resources, bring lawsuits for violations of California law in cases of statewide significance, but we do so as a law enforcement agency, representing the people of the state, rather than on behalf of individual Californians.

We are aware of social media posts stating that Attorney General's offices can intercede on your behalf to reinstate a disabled account, recover a hacked account, or restore access to a lost account. These posts are not authorized by any government agency and do not accurately reflect the role of attorneys general in the handling of consumer complaints.

If the loss of access to your account has resulted in harm, you may wish to consult with an attorney regarding any civil remedies that may be available to you. An attorney would directly represent your interests and is the one whose advice would be most helpful to you. You may obtain a referral to a certified lawyer referral service by contacting the State Bar at (866) 442-2529 (toll-free in California) or (415) 538-2250 (from outside California), or via their website at https://calbar.ca.gov.

If you have been the victim of online fraud, such as a hacked account, you may also wish to file a complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime Center that receives Internet related complaints. Complaints may be submitted electronically at https://www.ic3.gov/Home/ComplaintChoice/. For persons 60 and over, you may call the National Elder Fraud Hotline at (833) 372-8311 for assistance in filing your complaint with IC3.

Please be assured that your information will be retained in our consumer files and is of importance in helping this office take appropriate action to protect consumers. Thank you again for writing.

 

Sincerely,

Public Inquiry Unit

For Rob Bonta

Attorney General

Any idea on what the next steps should be?

For those who have had successful small claims suits against Meta, what would I need to write when submitting my case?

I need to make sure that I cut at the root of Meta's ban wave and the lack of transparency behind their decision-making. If people are accused of such heinous things as say, exploitation, there needs to be an explanation of what triggered the accusation. Their hiding everything behind AI is extremely unreliable and one-sided form of business with their consumers.

Any ideas on what needs to be conveyed to ensure a successful lawsuit?