u/Mirbat8

Call me corporate-washed or whatever, but I’ve always thought that football kits look better when they have a sponsor at the front.

I’m not saying that having any sponsor on a kit automatically makes a kit look better, though. The design of the kit and the logo has to work together in order to look good, and I feel that looks much more complete when compared to a blank counterpart. I absolutely despise Bournemouth’s kit this season for this reason.

Take Stockport County’s kits with their VITA sponsor. Their home kits these last few years are one of the most attractive kits I’ve ever seen. The clean blue color and the modern and simplistic VITA logo looks really nice. If you showed me the same kit without the sponsor, I probably wouldn’t have the same opinion.

Although it is just up to personal preferences at this point, I’ve seen people go out of their way to ask for sponsorless kits to purchase, even though I feel the kit looks better with it, barring religious reasons or being against sports gambling. (Sports betting company logos rarely look nice anyway!)

I apologize if this is a common question here, but I’ve searched for past posts about this but I couldn’t find any that were conclusive.

I tried the free version of both websites, I really like how Test Innovators give gives me a predicted score based on practice questions. (Although I do think it’s a bit severe, I’ve seen people comment about that here too) and I also like how Uworld’s test screen is very similar to the actual blue book test and I personally think the questions are a lot more realistic.

I got a 1320 on the June SAT (640 in Reading/Writing and 680 on Math) and I’m aiming for something like 1450 on the September SAT. I’ve done all the practice tests offered by blue book, and I got a 1510 on the most recent test. I’ve done the question bank questions until I’ve seen them all once.

All in all, what did you guys use to prepare for the test? Did it actually help you attain the score you want?