Is the rift between Communist movements over Trotskyism, Maoism, and Marxism-Leninism really needed?
In my country (Canada) for example, there are 3 active communist parties. All of them subscribe to the works of Marx, Engels, and Lenin, and uphold the vanguard party as the necessary vehicle for revolutionary change. Despite sharing all of the same goals, they all remain separate parties.
The Marxist Leninist party split from the original communist party in the 70’s because they thought they had become revisionist for supporting Khrushchev. Neither party denounces Stalin or Mao, and both view the Soviet Union as an example of actually existing socialism, yet neither have made any attempt to reconcile in the last 50 years.
The Revolutionary Communist Party is another group that seems to advocate for the exact same overarching ideas and policies, but differs from the other two in that it rejects “Socialism in One Country” and the legacy of Stalin and Mao, in favour of Trotsky and his theory of “Permanent Revolution.” Why does it matter whether or not you like Stalin or Trotsky, or think the Soviet Union should have embraced X policy or not over 100 years ago. None of these things seem to have any bearing to me on the implementation of socialism today, let alone in a country these things have nothing to do about.
Am I missing something?