2026 Brazilian General Election Guide: The Candidates
▲ 9 r/YAPms

2026 Brazilian General Election Guide: The Candidates

Although the election features 12 candidates, only five are noteworthy, as they are the ones registering in the polls and receiving media coverage. It is fair to say that this time, Brazilians are heading to the polls to choose between the left-wing incumbent and four different flavors of the Right.

LUIS INÁCIO LULA DA SILVA - BRAZIL READY FOR MORE - PT/PSB/PDT/PSOL/REDE/PCDOB/PV

https://preview.redd.it/gkgo4fs9bjjh1.png?width=786&format=png&auto=webp&s=380f42c7f054b5d9640d7c4ee505587ee356cc36

After winning three elections (2002, 2006, 2022) and losing three (1989, 1994, 1998), Lula is looking for the tie-breaker. In his last dance, the leading figure of the Brazilian left over the past 40 years seeks an unprecedented fourth term to govern the country for a total of 16 non-consecutive years. He maintains the choice of Geraldo Alckmin as vice president—a figure who was once one of his fiercest rivals and helped elect him in 2022 due to his more centrist profile.

Pros

  1. The third Lula administration achieved significant milestones, such as tax reform—an endeavor pursued unsuccessfully since the 1990s to unify and simplify Brazilian taxes while respecting the federal pact—and an income tax exemption for salaries up to 5,000 reais (US$ 960), coupled with increased taxation on the wealthiest segments of society. On the political front, Lula’s conciliatory nature enabled the government to maintain its congressional majority—even while facing blackmail from right-wing parties regarding proposals to amnesty those involved in the January 8 events—in order to pass priority measures.
  2. Despite being older than Trump and Biden (and turning 84 if he finishes his term in 2030), Lula's health isn't a major election issue for either his campaign or the voters. I actually find the videos of him bench-pressing amusing, since they're just meant to say, "The old guy here is still strong."
  3. As the only significant left-wing candidate, Lula will benefit from substantial TV and radio airtime (five and a half minutes) thanks to his coalition. Combined with a high baseline of support (46–47%), this could prove decisive in persuading undecided voters to hand him a first-round victory.
  4. Trump’s tariffs and his association with the Bolsonaro family are a powerful asset for Lula, who has been hammering home a sovereignty-focused narrative since last year through campaigns defending the PIX online payment system and upholding the Brazilian Supreme Court’s rulings regarding the 2023 coup plotters.
  • Cons
  1. The biggest challenge to be faced will be the perception of the cost of living. Even though inflation is under control and the economy is operating at full employment, the general public is dissatisfied, feeling that their money does not last the entire month. The primary causes of this are household indebtedness—which rose in recent years as the economy heated up—and the proliferation of online betting, a multi-million-dollar market that is now causing significant headaches.
  2. It is not only internal factors that threaten re-election: Donald Trump has a direct interest in the defeat of the only major South American country with a left-wing government remaining during his term and will do anything possible for achieve that. The tariffs imposed on Brazil boosted Lula's popularity, but retaliatory measures raise voter concerns. An aggressive or forced response could sway undecided voters to Flávio Bolsonaro.

FLÁVIO BOLSONARO - BRAZIL WILL WIN - PL

https://preview.redd.it/fzgroipzfjjh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=05392edf133bb0b11c861761a0902e586b778b4d

Flávio Bolsonaro—one of the sons of Jair Bolsonaro, the former president who has been convicted by the courts over coup attempt—was anointed as his father's personal candidate to represent the interests of Bolsonarism, to the detriment of other figures on the right viewed as more moderate (such as São Paulo Governor Tarcísio de Freitas). For vice president, he chose Alfredo Gaspar—a congressman from Alagoas and head of the investigation into pension system irregularities.

  • Pros

Despite all the issues surrounding the pre-campaign, being Bolsonaro's son provides a baseline of support that prevents any other right-wing candidacy from threatening him. Since a runoff is the most likely electoral scenario, Flávio can count on the fragmented right-wing vote, needing only a few undecided voters to swing the margin by a percentage point in either direction.

Even running on a single-party ticket (historically a disadvantage), Flávio will have 4 minutes and 20 seconds of daily TV and radio airtime to reduce his high disapproval ratings—particularly among female voters and those in the Northeast—while challenging Lula on tough-on-crime policies.

  • Cons

Flávio was launched into the race too early, and as a result, he has accumulated a wide variety of controversies that have left his campaign in a very precarious position:

  1. Her feud with stepmother Michelle Bolsonaro (who seeks to carve out her own identity within the family and was considered as a potential candidate in her husband's absence) didn't go down well with female voters. It doesn't help that many of Flávio's allies went so far as to say publicly that if Michelle were to run, they would prefer to see Lula elected rather than a woman.
  2. Flávio’s connection to businessman Daniel Vorcaro (who was arrested for orchestrating one of Brazil’s largest bank fraud schemes, involving bribery and attempted murder) caused his standing in the polls to drop following revelations that he had contacted Vorcaro just days before the arrest, addressing him as a friend and associate. His campaign tried to spin the story to claim that Vorcaro was linked to Lula, but it didn't gain traction.
  3. His choice for vice president faces accusations and investigations of having raped an underage girl and bought her silence for 100.000 reais (US$ 19.000). In his defense, the vice-candidate claimed that the person who committed the rape was his stepson, not him, and even went to the Supreme Court to request a DNA test. Regardless of whether the incident actually occurred, this deals a heavy blow to Flávio's candidacy.
  4. And on top of all that, his brother, former congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, is seen as instigating the imposition of tariffs against Brazil as an act of "revenge against the Brazilian judicial dictatorship that imprisoned his father and forced him into exile in the U.S" in his words. With all that the widespread political perception that Flávio will lose has tainted coalition negotiations, leading right-wing parties to declare neutrality regarding the presidential race rather than supporting him. He might even win, but he will need a lot of things to go right between now and October.

RONALDO CAIADO - Courage to Set Brazil Straight - PSD

Editor's note: \"Endireitar\" is a play on words, as it means both to correct something and to go to the right.

Two-term governor of the state of Goiás (a sort of Brazilian Nebraska), Ronaldo Caiado ran for president in 1989 and served as a senator for the same state for many years. He is a figure linked to the agricultural and livestock sector. Gilberto Kassab is his running mate and campaign strategist. His campaign should focus on highlighting that he is not corrupt like Flávio and how Goiás improved under his governorship, in addition to the public pledge to grant amnesty to those involved in the coup attempt, including Jair Bolsonaro.

  • Pros
  1. Right-wing voters might vote for him because he is a candidate with no recent corruption scandals, in addition to his image as a successful businessman. Especially if they want a candidate aligned with Bolsonarism—but one who isn't as closely tied to it as Flávio, yet not as odd as Zema.
  2. A tough stance on crime is always popular and he will have two minutes of daily airtime to highlight his qualities, with the aim of draining Flávio's support.
  • Cons
  1. Goiás is an economically important but politically irrelevant state. It is a candidacy with an expiration date unless something big happens.
  2. Despite its tough stance on crime, the Goiás police struggled to capture serial killer Lázaro Barbosa and only managed to kill him after a 20-day manhunt.
  3. His stance of not retaliating against Trump's tariffs and of granting amnesty to those convicted for the coup attempt is extremely unpopular outside the far right.

ROMEU ZEMA - NOVO

https://preview.redd.it/vwk7twm2qjjh1.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=26440b6c73cee05f2168d86e168cd9d74e576980

Another right-wing alternative, Zema served two terms as governor of the state of Minas Gerais (which is a swing state). He belongs to the Novo Party, a party that advocates for technocracy and the near-total reduction of the state's functions. His main platform is the privatization of state-owned companies. His running mate, Eduardo Girão, is a senator for the state of Ceará.

  • Pros
  1. His pro-privatization rhetoric enjoys support among business elites and the media as well as his harsh anti-PT rhetoric.
  • Cons
  1. His pro-privatization rhetoric does not sit well with voters, alongside comments characterizing people from the Northeast and North as lazy and dependent on welfare.
  2. He is, frankly speaking, very stupid: he was tipped to be the running mate on Flávio’s ticket until he attacked him in the wake of the Vorcaro scandal. Not only has he isolated himself, but he is also viewed by the far-right as an opportunistic traitor.
  3. Despite talk of an efficient state and fiscal adjustment, Minas Gerais defaulted on its debts to the federal government and only resumed payments this year. The state's debt has tripled since 2019 (the first year of his administration).
  4. He will not be entitled to radio and television campaign time, since his party has little representation in Congress.

RENAN SANTOS - MISSÃO

https://preview.redd.it/bahriacnsjjh1.png?width=980&format=png&auto=webp&s=082f8586307601c7435df02bc56251e05ab94f33

Representing a more libertarian right-wing electorate, Renan Santos is running as the candidate for the Missão Party. His running mate is retired Colonel Aroldo Medina. His platform advocates for the implementation of Bukele public security measures (such as the creation of CECOTS in the Amazon) and an economic shock therapy approach modeled on the policies Javier Milei is implementing in Argentina. He is the representative of the Brazilian Tea Party, seeking a young, hard-right electorate.

Pros

  • He is polling well among voters aged 29 and under, reaching as high as 15%.

It reaches voters who get their information from social media and podcasts, which somewhat offsets the lack of TV and radio airtime.

Cons

  • Missão—and its predecessor, the Free Brazil Movement (MBL)—is known for inflammatory, confrontational tactics, such as storming schools to document "left-wing indoctrination policies," infiltrating left-wing protests solely to provoke an assault, and advocating for U.S.-style free speech (leading a lawmaker linked to the group to state that Nazis should be allowed to demonstrate in public—an act that is illegal here). This could lead voters not to vote for Renan out of fear that he might be too radical.
  • It doesn't poll well with the rest of the electorate, especially voters outside the South and Southeast.
  • His opposition to the Misogyny Law (which seeks to curb the promotion of sexist rhetoric) resonates with the hard-right electorate but is poorly received by the rest, especially women. It does not help that he once declared himself "proudly sexist" on a podcast.

I will not discuss the details of the proposals, but there are some clear proposals shared by everyone on the right and oposed on the left:

  • Ideological alignment with the United States
  • Weakening of Brazil's ties to non-Western alliances such as BRICS and the pursuit of OECD membership
  • Limitations on Supreme Court rulings and the impeachment of judges viewed as "biased"
  • Spending cuts and the de-indexation of expenditures.
  • Creation of new federal prisons and classification of criminal factions as terrorist organizations, in line with U.S. guidance
  • Support for the right-wing populist coalition around the world (Milei, Bukele, Trump, Netanyahu, etc)

Next time I will analyze the scenario of the main electoral colleges.

u/MoleLocus — 6 days ago

Sonhando com o Impossível ou A Única Maneira de Nos Livrar do Tarcísio

"Interior vota em qualquer um pq tem medo do PT e só se importa com javaporco" é um argumento que muitos da capital/região metropolitana usam para reclamar quando o atual governador faz merda na região metropolitana, já que muitas coisas ficam restritas a ela (ex: problemas no metrô/trens).

Esse post é mais uma maneira de pensar numa maneira de como que o Tarcísio poderia perder a eleição deste ano. Mesmo que você deteste o Haddad ele é o único candidato viável que sobrou, então vamos assumir que haverá apenas dois candidatos relevantes: Tarcísio e Haddad.

Muito se fala do interior de forma genérica mas a maior concentração de votos fora da região metropolitana está em cinco cidades: Campinas, Sorocaba, São José dos Campos, Ribeirão Preto e Santos. Qualquer um que queira vencer precisa ter uma votação expressiva nestas cidades mesmo que perca. Vamos ver como foi o segundo turno de 2022 nelas:

Campinas: Tarcísio 56% x 44% Haddad

Sorocaba: Tarcísio 61% x 39% Haddad

São José dos Campos: Tarcísio 63% x 37% Haddad

Ribeirão Preto: Tarcísio 59% x 41% Haddad

Santos: Tarcísio 56% x 44% Haddad

Diferenças maiores de 10 pontos em todos os casos! Isso não seria problema caso o Haddad fizesse uma votação expressiva na região metropolitana, certo? Vamos ver os maiores colégios eleitorais da RMSP:

São Paulo: Haddad 54% x 46% Tarcísio

Guarulhos: Tarcísio 53% x 47% Haddad

São Bernardo: Haddad 54% x 46% Tarcísio

Osasco: Haddad 51% x 49% Tarcísio

Santo André: Tarcísio 52% x 48% Haddad

Percebam que enquanto o Tarcísio mantém uma diferença mínima de 10 porcento dos votos nos maiores colégios do interior o Haddad perde em 2 da Grande São Paulo e praticamente empata em um, tendo uma margem confortável apenas em dois. Isso é muito preocupante!

A única maneira de se eleger seria fazer uma votação expressiva e manter a margem nestes colégios do interior minimas (coisa de menos de 2 pontos). O resto do interior é maior mas dá menos votos e há regiões no extremo do estado que apoiam o PT de forma massiva.

Fazendo um cálculo de cabeça o Haddad poderia vencer/Tarcísio poderia perder caso acontecesse um cenário assim:

São Paulo Capital: Haddad 60% x 40% Tarcísio

Região Metropolitana: Haddad 55% x 45% Tarcísio (ou ganhar pelo maior número possível, sem perder os maiores colégios)

Grandes Cidades do Interior (Sorocaba/Campinas/Ribeirão Preto): Haddad 50% x 50% Tarcísio (ou perder pelo menor número possível)

Restante do Interior: Tarcísio 60% x 40% Haddad

Baixada Santista: Tarcísio 52% x 48% Haddad (não consigo imaginar o Haddad vendendo aqui, desculpem)

Vale do Paraíba: Tarcísio 55% x 45 Haddad (aqui tirando São José dos Campos tem pouco voto)

Isso daria algo em torno de Haddad 51% x 49% Tarcísio em todo o Estado. Extremamente apertado mas o suficiente para levar.

Vai ocorrer? É difícil pra cacete porque não temos uma polarização geográfica igual nos EUA que as regiões urbanas votam num partido e as cidades pequenas e regiões rurais votam em outra. E o eleitorado paulista também tem uma mentalidade de "não importa, vou ter que acordar cedo de manhã" que aceita qualquer merda que lhe cagem na cabeça que não ajuda.

Algo que pode ajudar é o risco da eleição terminar em primeiro turno caso haja apenas dois candidatos viáveis. Caso haja segundo turno, a única maneira do Haddad ter fôlego seria que o Lula vença em primeiro turno e/ou faça uma votação melhor do que fez no Estado em 2022.

RESUMINDO: Dá pro Tarcísio perder mas precisa ter uma combinação de resultados difícil. Não fiquem tristes e putos se tivermos o carioca por mais 4 anos pra botar mais pedágios, privatizar mais coisas e defender que a única maneira de dialogar com os EUA seja acabar com o PIX e vender o Porto de Santos pro Trump.

reddit.com
u/MoleLocus — 29 days ago

I never want to have another interaction in English on Reddit again

I'm ESL and I feel like every time I write in English I get stressed because it seems like the users are illiterate. If you make any grammatical mistake, a bunch of idiots come to correct you as if you were doing them a favor. If you're being sarcastic but don't put the damn /s at the end of the sentence, nobody understands that it's sarcasm and thinks you agree with what you said.

And every time I write in English, they always assume I'm American or speaking in an American context, and that irritates me deeply because the world is more than that country. I know that most of the site's users are American, but that doesn't imply that everyone is.

My desire is to drop everything and not interact with any fandom, to write for no one beyond my maternal line. I prefer to be isolated than to get irritated every time I seek contact.

I don't see how this is going to get any better.

PS: Yes, I know I'm writing this in English because I want to complain in this subreddit and there isn't a subreddit like this in my native language.

reddit.com
u/MoleLocus — 2 months ago
▲ 824 r/RouGenZ+3 crossposts

Fear is always a projection of what has already been done in the past

u/MoleLocus — 2 months ago
▲ 17 r/YAPms

Colombian Presidential Election: Far-Right and Left goes to the runoff, center right in a distant third place

u/MoleLocus — 3 months ago
▲ 31 r/YAPms

If Talarico loses, everyone needs to ditch Texas like Florida

Losing isnt an option, it's a make or break scenario that will define the next decade.

Win and Texas becomes a Purple State with a Senator who is young, actually reads the bible and likes slushies. Ann Richards will return in spirit to throw Abbott into a Cliff to die.

Lose and Texas will be ruby red where any republican can win even if they shot a kid in the face (and the kid is white). Texan Latinos will forever be right wingers just like Cubans. Even if blue cities and suburbs grow the new residents thinks like if they're in Idaho.

reddit.com
u/MoleLocus — 3 months ago
▲ 6 r/YAPms

Is there any important state where Dems doesnt suck about electoral geography?

"You can't be mad that Republicans draw squares in X states, democrats just have bad geography" is a common take given to explain why gerrymandering is easier for GOP than DEM:

- The rurals are deep red, more dispersed than deep blue cities

- Suburbs are purple-ish to red, making a good barrier against democrat candidates

So when you draw, you can slice cities and pack them with red rurals and suburbs without looking "ugly", while a dem gerrymander usually needs to make "ugly" shapes to dilute red voters with blue pockets. Political wisdom say that if Dems doesnt want that they need to move from rural counties or change their plataform to win enough red voters.

But is there any IMPORTANT state where it's the opposite? I stress the important because while Massachusetts is an example of bad GOP geography the state itself doesnt matter at all in national politics and even the local gop doesnt do anything to win elections anymore.

The only state I can see this becoming a example is Georgia: not only the Atlanta suburbs are trending left the rural counties are not bleeding red unlike the rest of the south. In the future you might see dem gerrymanders with nice shapes that doesnt run the entire map like Illinois.

reddit.com
u/MoleLocus — 3 months ago

How feels like to be in the "I want more toxic interactions and more drama" minority in DC Fandom

I really dont know why many are upsed that Natalia clocked Ara or Ara clocked Gabby, the show needs drama! Conflict! Rivalyties! I want Rosa humbling Natalia, not some mellow moment where they hug and say sorry!

u/MoleLocus — 3 months ago
▲ 2 r/YAPms

Brazilian 2026 presidential margins (vibe-based)

First Round: Lula 48 x 35 Flávio

Second Round: Lula 55 x 45 Flávio

u/MoleLocus — 3 months ago

Espaço Augusta de Cinema e Café Fellini são alvo de despejo no Centro de SP: 'Pior dia da minha vida', diz dona | G1

g1.globo.com
u/MoleLocus — 3 months ago
▲ 16 r/YAPms

It's possible to pinpoint where exactly the "we go high" strategy backfired? Now every time democrats try to fight they're seen as weak politicians with too much codes of honour

u/MoleLocus — 3 months ago