

Can anyone explain this contradiction?
Hi everyone. Sorry for seeking reassurance twice in 24 hours, but my brain just will not drop this topic, ugh. I'm someone who wants to believe in the afterlife so badly, but keeps finding reasons to shoot down the idea. This is another cycle of that.
Anyway, I was reading this article explaining all the evidence for NDEs being proof of the afterlife. It's pretty convincing, but one thing really jumped out at me, since it contradicts a common narrative. One commonly cited piece of evidence is that NDErs only ever see deceased loved ones on the other side. But according to this article, of the people who saw loved ones, "4% described meeting beings that were alive at the time of their experiences".
Now, 4% isn't a lot, but that's a non-zero number, translating to 3 people who saw living loved ones. This casts doubt on the claim that NDErs only ever meet deceased people, and I can only think of three ways to explain this inconsistency, none of which feel good:
- These 3 people really did have NDEs, but didn't really see their living loved ones. What they saw were the "light beings" reported in other NDEs taking on a more familiar form (but of course there's no way to know if that's possible).
- These 3 people thought they had NDEs, but were actually dreaming or hallucinating. This would cast all NDEs into doubt. If some of them are products of the brain, couldn't all of them be?
- These 3 people didn't have NDEs at all and are fabricating their entire stories, explaining why they go against the common narrative. But there's not really any reason to think that, and I don't want to accuse anyone of lying.
Does anyone have more context or insight into this? I should probably clarify that I myself have never had an NDE, so I just have to trust the people who have. Like I said, I really want there to be something beyond this, but these types of inconsistencies really make me doubt. Thanks in advance for responses.
Is there anything directly debunking the ketamine theory?
Hi all. I've been doing a lot of reading about NDEs this past week, and it's been causing me a lot of anxiety (thanks, OCD). I've always been vaguely spiritual, but never thought seriously about consciousness or the afterlife until now. I would really like it if there was something after death, but I can't help but question everything. I've been reading a lot of old posts and comments on this sub, and just about every materialist explanation seems to get thoroughly debunked-except for ketamine.
The arguments I've seen against ketamine are: "You wouldn't remember the trip as vividly"; "you'd still be tripping when you woke up"; "it would be a negative experience"; and "that wouldn't account for out of body experiences". However, I have seen comments from people who've tried ketamine refuting these objections, saying their experiences with K were identical to NDEs. I've even seen people claim that the ultimate K trip does not require brain activity-just like NDEs.
Then again, I've seen statements that contradict the contradictions. I also saw someone claim that the original author of the ketamine theory debunked or abandoned it? Is that true? Also, I know that ketamine is used in anesthesia, which seems to support the theory that they cause NDEs-but has there ever been a verified NDE that happened without anesthesia?
Sorry if this is long and rambly; my anxiety is just through the roof right now. Like I said, I really want there to be something after death, but the ketamine explanation seems pretty foolproof. Is there a simple "silver bullet" debunking the claim "ketamine causes NDEs"? Or do we just not know? Thanks in advance.
Los Angeles Doe (1982)
On February 12th, 1982, an individual was found dead at a construction site at 22nd Street and La Salle Avenue in Los Angeles, California. The cause of death was determined to be a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head. This individual was initially assumed to be a cisgender man on account of their masculine haircut and clothing; however, they were ultimately determined to be female. There is some speculation that this person was a transgender man, though it's also entirely possible they were a cisgender woman with a more masculine presentation.
Physical Description:
- Body Condition: Recognizable face
- Estimated Age: 30-50
- Race: Hispanic/Latino, White
- Sex: Female (May or may not have lived as a woman)
- Height: 5 feet 9 inches
- Weight: 145 pounds
- Hair: Short, black hair in a "men's style"
- Eye Color: Brown
Clothing:
- Tan/white Town & Country wool jacket, size M
- Blue/white striped Stained Glass sweater
- Brown L'Avion trousers, size 30 waist
- Blue underwear
- White socks with red stripes
- White/blue Nike canvas shoes
Tattoos:
This person had three tattoos, though frustratingly, photos of them are either nonexistent or have never been publicly released. Their tattoos have been described as follows:
- Yellow/orange tiger (also described as a lion in one report) on the left side of the abdomen
- Red scorpion on the right side of the abdomen
- Red/yellow crab with the letter "V" on the left buttock
That's unfortunately all the information there is. This case is handled by the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner, and if anyone thinks they have information related to this person's identity, please contact them at (323) 343-0512.
Sources:
https://www.namus.gov/UnidentifiedPersons/Case#/4311 (Uncensored post-mortem photo under "images and documents")
https://www.doenetwork.org/cases/software/main.html?id=1994UFCA
https://me.lacounty.gov/unidentified-person-detail/?caseNumber=1982-02067
https://unidentified-awareness.fandom.com/wiki/Los_Angeles_Doe_(1982)
[TOMT] [COMEDIAN] A comedy bit about a guy giving his childhood crush a gross drawing?
I kid you not, I tried submitting this question twice before on a former account, but had zero luck. This is my last chance and last hope.
I am trying to find a stand up(?) comedy bit that my father played for me either on his phone or in his car back in 2019 or so. I have no clue who the comedian was or where my father found it, and when I asked him, he said he can't remember either. I can say for sure that the comedian was an American man, and I think he mentioned being from New Jersey in his routine. Here's a quick summary of the bit that my father played:
When this guy was a kid (like maybe 7 years old) he had a crush on the little girl he sat next to in class, who he called "Carrie". He didn't know how to handle having a crush on this girl, so he started teasing her and stealing her stuff. Things officially got out of hand when he left a drawing of her getting crapped on by a dog on her desk. This resulted in his parents getting called to pick him up from the principal's office. The comedian gets into character as his father and does a very gruff voice for him; my dad compared it to Grunkle Stan's voice in Gravity Falls, if that helps. The story ends with the future comedian and his parents going home, with the kid apologizing for making Carrie cry, and his father telling him you do dumb things when you're in love.
I have tried googling this, but nothing, and I mean nothing has come up. When I tried searching for it again just now, the only relative result was my own old post in this sub about it. It has to be either someone super famous and obvious I'm being too vague about, or someone so obscure that a google search doesn't bring them up. The only way I'm tracking this comedian and routine down at this point is if someone sees this and knows exactly what I'm talking about. If that's you, please let me know. Thank you in advance.