
China has become woke (not really)
>In a response to a suggestion letter, the Supreme People's Court of China stated: “To implement the provisions of laws such as the Constitution, the Civil Code, and the Employment Promotion Law, and to effectively safeguard citizens' personal dignity against infringement, the Supreme People's Court hereby clarifies the following adjudication rules: ...First, regarding cases involving the public insult or defamation of an individual's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, People's Courts generally deem such acts to constitute an infringement of general personality rights; they shall order the cessation of the infringement, the issuance of an apology, and compensation for emotional distress, thereby explicitly establishing the illegality of discriminatory speech and conduct based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. ...Second, in the contexts of recruitment, hiring, job reassignment, or dismissal, should an employer engage in differential treatment on the grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, People's Courts shall, in accordance with the law, determine that the employer has committed employment discrimination; they shall order the revocation of the relevant decision, compensation for losses, and other remedies, thereby explicitly prohibiting unreasonable discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression within the sphere of employment. ...Third, should a school impose improper disciplinary measures upon a student—or fail to fulfill its administrative duties, thereby resulting in campus bullying—on the grounds of the student's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, People's Courts shall, in accordance with the law, hold the school liable, thereby reinforcing the school's obligation to protect students' personal liberty and dignity. ...These cases collectively demonstrate the People's Courts' unequivocal stance regarding the equal protection of the legitimate rights and interests of sexual minorities—namely, that any unreasonable discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression is strictly prohibited by law. ...Moving forward, we will continue to systematically review cases across the country involving the protection of the rights and interests of sexual minorities, summarize adjudication rules, and standardize adjudication criteria. At appropriate junctures, we will formalize established adjudication rules through mechanisms such as judicial interpretations, conference minutes, guiding cases, reference cases, and exemplary cases, thereby strengthening the supply of legal norms. Furthermore, we will incorporate topics such as the protection of personality rights into judicial training programs to ensure the lawful protection of citizens' personal liberty and dignity.”
Where is my social conservatism? I can't believe they betrayed us /j
(It's not a policy but only a court explanation, some people say that it means nothing)