Shortly before Calyx paused releases the battery charging limit was disabled due to some bugs. I haven't used Calyx since - how is it nowadays? Can you limit charging to 80% again on pixels? Thanks!
With the new audio player features, does this work? I often switch devices and this would be a great solution for my audiobooks!
Not edited!
Love the new master chief fig
What are your experiences, are there brands that have them more/less?
I somehow really dislike the feeling of oily fingers after some builds which is why I actually considered going back to more Lego (meh). But so far I only have experience with replica sets (or knock-offs) and a large order from webrick from before they were acquired by gobricks.
I often hear that gobricks are supposed to be great quality-wise (color, fit, etc) but did you have experiences with the sticky residue with gobricks, too?
I even tried washing some AliExpress sets before building but they were still sticky.
Edit: It's mentioned in the starter guide, too, I'm just wondering if there is a pattern to it. "They might be a little oily with residue leftovers, but this might happen with Lego bricks too, because the production technology is similar."
*Repost because first post got deleted for what I presume was quoting Linus' insults in the title*
I don't get why he needed to throw around insults in the latest wan show. It makes him look really insecure himself about being disagreed with.
I for example proudly "wear the hat" when it comes to streaming shows etc. I would never agree to calling adblocking "piracy" however. In my opinion it's really important to distinguish this. It's not about legality but about how watching ads can never be considered "payment" in a ethical society.
Platforms like google make their money because they can *hope* people watch their ads but there is no contract forcing people to. If you mute your PC or look away on YouTube or shut your eyes&ears in cinemas during ads no payment is being forfeit and if you block the ads more techy it's the same.
Equating either of those behaviours with actual theft of real or intellectual property is dangerous and even dystopian. Or to use Linus' words, "objectively wrong". Attention to something should never be considered payment but a happy byproduct of something worthy to see. If it's not good/safe enough that people want to see it, that's the problem of the ad's maker, not the problem of the viewer.
That kind of discourse is important and shouldn't be belittled and it really annoys me then that happens. Just my 2cts.
Sincerely,
another insecure little btch