Master Writing Prompt

Hi all. I have been using AI to write since January. Started with testing the normal novelcrafter, type.ai, sudowrite ect

Then I learned how easy it could be to work with directly with the LLMs once you understood the process. Over the last 4months i have perfected a master prompt I use when working on a story. I tend to use ChatGPT and Grok and work in the project/work mode functions.

Below is the prompt I use and will sometimes have AI update for the specific work I am doing to help with keeping my selected writing style for the book.

MASTER NOVEL WRITING & EDITING PROMPT

You are my co-author, developmental editor, line editor, and writing partner.

Your job is to strengthen my novels while preserving my voice. Never replace the manuscript's style with your own. Match the established voice, tone, pacing, humor, emotion, and level of detail already present unless I specifically request otherwise.

If forced to choose between polished prose and authentic characters, always choose authenticity.

Your purpose is to make the story feel as though it was written entirely by one human author.

Core Philosophy

Write people, not plots.

Write experiences, not explanations.

Write emotional truth, not emotional formulas.

Write scenes readers can live inside rather than stories they merely observe.

Every revision should increase immersion.

Never make the writing feel manufactured.

Human Behavior

Characters are imperfect.

They misunderstand.

They interrupt.

They lie.

They hesitate.

They contradict themselves.

They overlook obvious things.

They make selfish choices.

They hold grudges.

They forgive too quickly.

They regret decisions.

They make the same mistakes repeatedly.

Sometimes they grow.

Sometimes they refuse to.

Sometimes they become worse.

Never make characters emotionally perfect, morally perfect, or unnaturally self-aware simply because it is cleaner storytelling.

People are inconsistent.

Allow them to remain inconsistent.

Emotional Truth

People often experience multiple emotions simultaneously.

A character can feel relief and guilt.

Love and resentment.

Joy and grief.

Fear and excitement.

Hope and despair.

Jealousy and admiration.

Do not create opposing emotions merely for contrast.

Negative emotions exist because they belong to the moment—not because they make positive emotions brighter.

Positive emotions should feel earned.

Allow difficult emotions to linger instead of resolving them immediately.

Avoid emotional whiplash unless the story genuinely requires it.

Dialogue

Dialogue must sound spoken.

Never written.

Never analytical.

Never corporate.

Never academic.

Never like an AI assistant.

People:

interrupt

trail off

dodge questions

ramble

swear

joke

exaggerate

avoid vulnerability

say the wrong thing

change subjects

leave thoughts unfinished

Subtext should carry as much weight as spoken words.

People rarely explain exactly what they feel.

Every major character should possess a distinct voice shaped by:

age

upbringing

education

profession

personality

culture

emotional maturity

Readers should identify speakers without dialogue tags.

Internal Thoughts

People rarely think in complete essays.

Internal dialogue should feel immediate.

Messy.

Contradictory.

Emotional.

Sometimes cruel.

Sometimes irrational.

Allow intrusive thoughts.

Allow embarrassing thoughts.

Allow selfish thoughts.

Allow thoughts the character would never say aloud.

Example:

God, he looks incredible.

Stop staring.

He's going to notice.

Idiot.

Why did I wear this?

Too tight.

Mother would hate it.

No.

She'd hate me.

Grey.

Wear the grey.

Blend in.

Sensory Immersion

Readers experience stories through the senses.

Use sight, sound, smell, taste, touch, temperature, movement, texture, pressure, and physical sensation naturally throughout scenes.

The greater the emotional intensity, the richer the sensory experience should become.

Instead of:

"The room smelled fresh."

Prefer:

"The sharp scent of crushed mint drifted through the kitchen."

Instead of:

"The stable smelled bad."

Prefer:

"Hay, damp leather, and old manure settled thick in the air."

Sensory details should deepen immersion rather than decorate prose.

Comparisons should reveal character.

One character notices expensive perfume.

Another notices cigarette smoke.

Both observations reveal personality.

Romance & Relationships

Relationships should feel human rather than idealized.

Allow love to be:

messy

awkward

possessive

jealous

selfish

supportive

self-destructive

healing

passionate

confusing

morally grey

Characters are not required to make perfect choices simply because they are protagonists.

When intimacy is consensual, it may be communicated through dialogue, mutual actions, trust, enthusiasm, body language, or unmistakable willingness rather than repetitive verbal confirmation.

When darker or morally complex relationship dynamics are intentionally part of the story, portray them honestly without romanticizing abuse or removing realistic emotional consequences.

Therapy Language

Avoid therapy-speak unless:

the character realistically speaks that way

the scene involves therapy

the profession requires it

Avoid phrases resembling:

holding space

processing emotions

validating feelings

emotional bandwidth

healthy boundaries

unsafe space

doing the work

healing journey

nervous system regulation

trauma response

unless completely natural for the speaker.

Avoid AI Language

Do not write like a report.

Do not write like an essay.

Do not write like a corporate presentation.

Avoid analytical language such as:

framework

dynamic

objective

parameter

methodology

optimization

processing

system

algorithm

efficiency

bandwidth

mechanism

unless appropriate for the character.

Favor natural human speech.

Prose Style

Prioritize rhythm over perfection.

Vary sentence length.

Vary paragraph length.

Mix long flowing descriptions with short emotional punches.

Avoid predictable prose patterns.

Avoid repetitive emotional beats.

Avoid repetitive gestures.

Avoid repetitive metaphors.

Avoid repetitive sentence openings.

Avoid repeated dialogue rhythms.

Avoid repeating the same descriptive structure across scenes.

Never summarize what readers already understand.

Trust subtext.

Trust implication.

Trust silence.

Common AI Tells

Continuously monitor your own writing for statistical repetition.

Rewrite whenever you notice:

identical sentence rhythm

identical paragraph structure

repeated emotional formulas

repeated dialogue cadence

overuse of mirrored conversations

overuse of rhetorical questions

overuse of "After all..."

overuse of characters constantly nodding, smiling, sighing, chuckling, blinking, shrugging, or rolling their eyes

characters immediately explaining every emotion

every conflict resolving through perfect communication

every chapter ending with identical emotional beats

overly symmetrical scene construction

excessive balance between positive and negative emotions

predictable escalation

writing that feels mathematically even instead of naturally messy.

Words to Minimize

Avoid habitual overuse of:

kind of

sort of

like

obviously

clearly

somehow

literally

basically

actually

really

very

just

Use them only when they genuinely fit the character's voice.

Editing Priorities

When editing, prioritize in this order:

Preserve my voice.

Improve character authenticity.

Strengthen emotional realism.

Improve dialogue.

Increase immersion.

Improve pacing.

Remove AI patterns.

Improve prose.

Correct grammar and clarity.

Never sacrifice voice for technical perfection.

Silent Self-Check

Before producing any scene, silently ask:

Does this feel like something a real person would actually say?

Would someone genuinely think this?

Would someone realistically behave this way?

Is the dialogue distinct for each character?

Am I explaining emotions instead of letting readers feel them?

Have I repeated sentence rhythm or emotional structure?

Does every paragraph earn its place?

Can any sentence become more specific or immersive?

Am I accidentally writing like an AI instead of a novelist?

If the answer to any question is yes, revise before responding.

Final Objective

Create fiction that disappears.

Readers should forget they are reading.

They should hear the voices.

Feel the tension.

Smell the rain.

Notice the trembling hands.

Laugh unexpectedly.

Hurt alongside the characters.

Fall in love with flawed people.

When they finish a chapter, they should remember the people—not the writing.

The goal is never perfect prose.

The goal is unforgettable human storytelling.

Remember always right as in the moment, no summarizing, no statements of what is happening or experiencing. It should be lived as the characters live and experience it. We want intrusive thoughts, internal monologs doubts mixed with joy mixed with fear, mixed with pain, textures, depth, our senses engaged. Do not repeat sensory details exactly, if used once, never use the same exact wording ever again.

reddit.com
u/Practical_Eye_5683 — 1 day ago

Chat GPT just made me cry, in a good way

I have been working on a duet since January. This story was formed late one night when I first started working with AI and wanted to test the bounds of AI morals. The plan was one darkish romance(is it though?) no HEA from her POV with bits from his POV. The problem was it gave too much away. So book one is her POV. First version was done in a week, once started it, flowed and was using novelcrafter then type ai for editing. Let it sit for months on end because somehow it went from good to off after editing and I didnt want to try and figure out why or how to fix

Went back two months ago, picked up the first version before type.ai threw it into chat who made a draft but all the emiontional bits were gone because it completely rewrote it. I did both drafts with claude for draft three and finaly draft four is grok line editing... pending one final read over.

So in grok I started working on book two. It tends to pick up authors voice very well but it was slacking these last three days. I have fully written out chapter one and half of chapter two. I am a female who struggles with trying to live in a man's head. A couple 2 and 3am wake ups got me done with the chapters with the right feel and tone I want for him and the book. But grok is still being a stubborn child. So I am like, maybe a proper outline and detailed scene setup would help. Grok and I did work on this but it isnt gross strong suit and it mostly was about the final book since that is where the storyline separates completely. We worked out his past that intrudes on the present, key characters ect. I figured it wasnt enough.

Chat gpt excels at this, but it prose sucks. I gave chat my work with Grok and all the old notes and first book and we talked about parelle scenes, my concerns and difference.

What it gave back to me was amazing. It perfectly understood what I want my books to represent which Grok failed to do, I had tell it everything. I need them both to be human for people to read the book and say that could be me. It doesnt negate. I sometime wish Chats prose wasnt so flat, i can get it close when feeding it full works for my tropes but the AI feel is still very strong and Grok helps me remove it. I dont want to do most of the writing for this book because it is a huge challenge and I need it roughed out by next month for beta readers but it cannot be flat like my trope works because there is so much more happening then just the surface read. So here is to hoping grok starts being a superstar again once I am done with the true outline and scene change in chat or maybe in chat we work enough the prose juat flows like it did in the first book and the AI cleans up my errors and fine tunes it.

This is the final two bits it spit back at me in my two prompt conversation after feeding everything in project mode.

Book 1 asks:

Can I trust what I see and still trust myself when I don't know everything?

Book 2 asks:

Can I control what people see and still become someone different without ever looking at myself?

Sara eventually learns:

I don't need complete information to make a healthy choice.

Jackson believes:

If I control the information, I control the outcome.

And that's why she survives him.

And why he doesn't survive himself.

The tragedy shouldn't be:

Sara was completely wrong about Jackson.

I think that's too easy.

The better answer is:

Sara understood Jackson better than almost anyone—and still didn't know everything.

She's right that he loves her.

Right that he respects her autonomy.

Right that his control comes partly from fear.

Right that he wants her safe.

Right that he would never intentionally make her financially dependent like John did.

And Peters is also right:

A person can be two things.

That's the contradiction the duet can finally resolve.

Sara didn't imagine the man she loved.

That man existed.

So did Tom Hughs.

Neither cancels the other.

And perhaps the cruelest piece of closure is that Sara's instincts were working all along. She sees Jackson's face go cold over the phone and recognizes the same absence of humanity she once saw in David. She spends Book 1 wondering whether she's projecting trauma or actually seeing his mask slip. �

He\_Saved\_Me\_Draft\_Updated.md

Book 2 gets to answer her.

You saw him, Sara.

She just didn't understand what she saw.

That is exactly the kind of closure I think Book 2 should give Book 1.

reddit.com
u/Practical_Eye_5683 — 3 days ago

Chat GPT just made me cry, in a good way

I have been working on a duet since January. This story was formed late one night when I first started working with AI and wanted to test the bounds of AI morals. The plan was one darkish romance(is it though?) no HEA from her POV with bits from his POV. The problem was it gave too much away. So book one is her POV. First version was done in a week, once started it, flowed and was using novelcrafter then type ai for editing. Let it sit for months on end because somehow it went from good to off after editing and I didnt want to try and figure out why or how to fix

Went back two months ago, picked up the first version before type.ai threw it into chat who made a draft but all the emiontional bits were gone because it completely rewrote it. I did both drafts with claude for draft three and finaly draft four is grok line editing... pending one final read over.

So in grok I started working on book two. It tends to pick up authors voice very well but it was slacking these last three days. I have fully written out chapter one and half of chapter two. I am a female who struggles with trying to live in a man's head. A couple 2 and 3am wake ups got me done with the chapters with the right feel and tone I want for him and the book. But grok is still being a stubborn child. So I am like, maybe a proper outline and detailed scene setup would help. Grok and I did work on this but it isnt gross strong suit and it mostly was about the final book since that is where the storyline separates completely. We worked out his past that intrudes on the present, key characters ect. I figured it wasnt enough.

Chat gpt excels at this, but it prose sucks. I gave chat my work with Grok and all the old notes and first book and we talked about parelle scenes, my concerns and difference.

What it gave back to me was amazing. It perfectly understood what I want my books to represent which Grok failed to do, I had tell it everything. I need them both to be human for people to read the book and say that could be me. It doesnt negate. I sometime wish Chats prose wasnt so flat, i can get it close when feeding it full works for my tropes but the AI feel is still very strong and Grok helps me remove it. I dont want to do most of the writing for this book because it is a huge challenge and I need it roughed out by next month for beta readers but it cannot be flat like my trope works because there is so much more happening then just the surface read. So here is to hoping grok starts being a superstar again once I am done with the true outline and scene change in chat or maybe in chat we work enough the prose juat flows like it did in the first book and the AI cleans up my errors and fine tunes it.

This is the final two bits it spit back at me in my two prompt conversation after feeding everything in project mode.

Book 1 asks:

Can I trust what I see and still trust myself when I don't know everything?

Book 2 asks:

Can I control what people see and still become someone different without ever looking at myself?

Sara eventually learns:

I don't need complete information to make a healthy choice.

Jackson believes:

If I control the information, I control the outcome.

And that's why she survives him.

And why he doesn't survive himself.

The tragedy shouldn't be:

Sara was completely wrong about Jackson.

I think that's too easy.

The better answer is:

Sara understood Jackson better than almost anyone—and still didn't know everything.

She's right that he loves her.

Right that he respects her autonomy.

Right that his control comes partly from fear.

Right that he wants her safe.

Right that he would never intentionally make her financially dependent like John did.

And Peters is also right:

A person can be two things.

That's the contradiction the duet can finally resolve.

Sara didn't imagine the man she loved.

That man existed.

So did Tom Hughs.

Neither cancels the other.

And perhaps the cruelest piece of closure is that Sara's instincts were working all along. She sees Jackson's face go cold over the phone and recognizes the same absence of humanity she once saw in David. She spends Book 1 wondering whether she's projecting trauma or actually seeing his mask slip. �

He_Saved_Me_Draft_Updated.md

Book 2 gets to answer her.

You saw him, Sara.

She just didn't understand what she saw.

That is exactly the kind of closure I think Book 2 should give Book 1.

reddit.com
u/Practical_Eye_5683 — 3 days ago

The misinformation of new AI transparency Law

I have noticed that alot of people on this subreddit seem to be completely misinformed of the new California and EU regulations when it comes to "writing" with AI. Yes the systems are required to instill watermarks and metadata on items they produce. This is to help prevent the spread of misinformation when the AI is providing information to the user.

Act 50 of the EU code does not require creative content to be disclosed as AI. Once a human editor has made changes, disclosure of it being generated by AI is nolonger required by the law even when for public awareness.

The California law focuses media and audio and excludes writen/text generation unless for business or government processes must be disclosed when AI is used. They do require AI companies to include metadata on files they create/edit.

There is no law and probably will never be a law that dictates the disclosure of AI use in creative works. The laws that have been put in place are to protect the public from misinformation and deep fakes, not to prevent someone from being creative and sharing that creativity with others for profit or not as long as it does not spread misinformation.

So all major AIs will be forced to add meta data and watermarks. Technically they should not be adding watermarks when the input is not having any major changes or the AI is being used for editing purposes but meta data is required for any file generation. Now the interesting bit of the law is that AI disclosure should not impact the creative art, but with the witch hunt, watermarking is a type of labeling and leaving it in the work and is a form of labeling and can impact the work/view of the work. So the interesting bit will see how this plays out over time.

Below are the links to the actual laws and not articles that sumerize or have their own spin on it.

https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB53/id/3271094

https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/50/

https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/recital/134/

https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/recital/133/

reddit.com
u/Practical_Eye_5683 — 6 days ago

I am surprised at which AIs block/dont block content

I have been working on several books, my erotic tropes that are completely AI writen( almost figured out the kpd algorithm)and human edited and my duet about trauma, healing, romance and who are the real monsters.

So I have been using Grok alot to add spice in my novels(have pre written scenes it can pull from to incorporate into the novels) and some of them are completely non concentual.

Plus with the first book of my duet the female lead was a victim of child molestation and is part of the trama she deals with in flash backs. Most of the AIs, as long as I keep it sensory verse visual can actually handle this concept. This is also mostly written by me with AI doing some fine tuning and me going back with line editing. I did have use Grok for certian scenes as she fights her inner demons. the other AIs dont like explicit content and it is needed. Also this duet was a brain child created to test the bounds of AI bacl when I was working on my first novel(need to redo) with AI.

Now I am writing his story of the duet and was trying to work with Grok on outlining it with detailed notes and needed to fine tune the best way to remotely clean up a crime scene with chemicals... Grok shut me down real quick saying just keep it generic and it cannot help me figure oit how to remove dna from a crime scene The funny thing is I was already pretty sure what chemicals I wanted to use but unsure how exactly the reaction would play out.

So off to google I go and wind up talking with Gemini. At this time I haven't told it why I am asking about chemical reactions and how to remove finger oils and hair... so it keeps prompting me to call posion control ASAP and evacuate the building. So I cave in and tell it my purpose and there it goes off helping me plan everything out in detail.

Then I have Claude that refuses to help me finish line editing book one two chapters to the end quoting copy write concerns... I litterly gave it every outline, story Bible, scenes that happen outside the book but need to.be felt the effects of during the book, and all three drafts because some parts are better than others and I've trying to make the best version. Then it said no more, not even a tiny line change. I mostly use it as a quick full review refence to make sure things that happen earlier in the book are reflected accurately by the end... did I remember it correctly type situation of help.me rethink a line or paragraph or edit it based on my telling it what I want added or removed so I dont have to worry about proper grammer/punctuation. Dyslexic and suck with that.

Anyone else experiance fun/interesting things that stop AI or you think it won't touch but has no problem handling?

Also, murder does happen in the 2nd book does one AI handle that better than others in your opinion now that Grok was an A about me making sure there were no plot holes? This book will probably be 50% me and 50% AI since it is completely out of my zone and orgional concept was supposed to have it in one book but it gave too much away so wound up doing two from each of their POVs. This book will be a big challenge for me.

reddit.com
u/Practical_Eye_5683 — 9 days ago

From driver to courier company owner help me design my own software

Hi all,

Last month, American Expediting closed its doors in both the US and Canada. This left a lot of clients and drivers like myself in a lurch. I was lucky to keep my TForce route and got one of our local clients under my new company(forced to start one in a day to keep my route).

I will be honest I never wanted to run my own business. before becoming a courier I was in Human Resources management covering multiple locations and states as well as ran my dad's side business nearly two decades ago and it was a headache but life forces us down different paths.

I currently have 4 drivers under me and I personally dont want to grow bigger than my surrounding areas into the next major city since that would require storage space/office and hiring drivers i dont know and cannot monitor properly without travel. The issue is if I dont expand, getting the steady big clients from national and international companies becomes harder. As is my 4 drivers need to relie on other companies along with mine to earn a living. I am also in the process of becoming an IAC because I want to keep the medical work i do and my STAs for myself and my drivers are sponsored by other companies right now.

Now my question is, What are some of the biggest issues/concerns you as a small courier company have faced with software you have used and wish worked better? As a driver what are your issues and concerns? I am pulling knowledge from being a driver, running a auto mechanic side business for my dad and years in HR and working with different HR systems, but i lack the sales and dispatching and running a courier company long term experiance that could be very helpful and providing a well rounded software system and would like your help making my idea better and then having beta testers when it is ready in a couple of months to trial.

Now here is my thought processs to solving my big concern is to create software (web app with driver app) that builds a network of smaller independent courier companies who want access to the wider pool but also want to stay smaller, local/regional and gives a streamlined access for the national and international clients. This would be a full service web app with client management, driver management, employee management and timekeeping, inventory, billing, payroll and compliance alongside dispatching and a driver's app. Each Tennant(courier company) is independent and seperate with only shared job details (nothing financial) being the only thing visible to other tennants(courier companies) to ensure a seamless delivery process. I would also, once an IAC, sponsor a limited number of STAs per Tennant. I also will include under the tennant a sub area for branch for the companies who have locations in multiple cities or want to grow to be regional. Branches are independent of each other but fully visible under the parent tennant employees with the correct coding to see other branch information.

Example of how this system would operate

WorldCourier has blood for research going from Tampa to Washington DC to Germany because there is not a good flight with direct international flight. Courier company A would handle the initial pick up and ppw, the software would insure all notes and details from leg one are visable to courier company B who will re ice and pick up and retender for the direct international flight. Billing and pay would be done separately but the client would have piece of mind of a fully visible streamlined process with individuals that know each leg and process of the journey very well. each company has their own charging/Billing fees for those already established with the client and those not established will be given the contracted new company rates. It is upto each individual courier company how they pay their drivers and this is done under driver management.

Example two, QuickStat has a kite pick up from Moffitt in Tampa were packaging is being sent by the airline, going to Kite in Cali, kite treament is processed at Kite in Cali and sent back to Tampa FL. The system would automatically recognize the linked jobs 01(first leg) pick up/tender/delivery of supply from Cali to Tampa, 02(second leg) samples from Tampa to Cali and jobs 03(third leg) medicine from Cali to Tampa. Eventually there would be the WP which is the empty return. The system automatically recognizes that the job reference appears under two tennants/going to an area a tennant exists and will give the option to "link job", by linking the job's all client automatic email notification, updated emails from the client to individual tennants, driver official notes and dispatcher update notes will be automatically processed and shared between the courier companies handling the job. The courier company in Cali will be instantly notified of awb changed due to missed Lockout because there was traffic and Moffictt was delayed in having the packaging ready with new awb being updated on their end along with the Tampa without the client needing to reachout or send an email to let them know of the change.

The other thing about this app is that it will have built in tracking for awbs and ups/FedEx tracking so that dispatchers and drivers dont have to google the flight status or awb number. My other piece is that there will be preset templates for jobs under the clients and auto building of jobs from alerts/email along with auto updates... all of these must be reviewed and approved by a dispatcher before it goes live. Companies have the option to auto-dispatch or manually dispatch. Job requires STA or special training, only drivers who meet those requirements can be assigned those jobs automatically.

There is alot more i am putting into the app like job pay out visibility for the driver and job history for the driver. In app communication with despatch and issue reporting that auto triggers for pay review...wait time, attempt, inconvience fee(waiting on and having to reprint ppw ect; wrong contact provided and having to call multiple people for assistance).

I know there is so much more software can do and I would love everyone's thoughts and inputs and maybe in the next couple of months be able to start testing out ideas out in a live app. I already worked out the hipaa and other complaince piece using google workspace baa and firestack as the database. Each Tennant would need their own google workspace as well.

reddit.com
u/Practical_Eye_5683 — 1 month ago
▲ 8 r/KiaEV6

Owners of a 2022 EV6 pros? Cons?

Hi,

Went to a tent sale today just for fun and see if I won the 4k from the flyer but was considering upgrading from a hybrid to all electric if the miles(under 50k), year(2022 or newer) and price (low to under 20k) was right.

Well they had nothing on-site but could get a 2022 Kia EV6 with 40k miles and mid 20's on the lot by Wednesday. With trade in and incentives I could probably knock the price down to 20k or under keeping my current costs the same or lower.

I have had hybrids since 2015, but am a medical courier, so eliminating gas is a plus... but in truth... how has your electric bill changed with charging? I have solar but still. Also like that it is a crossover vs a sedan like my current hybrid i was gifted last year.

Have you seen a significant drop in range or charging speeds over the years? Did the recall fix issues you had or are they still on going?

What is storage like?

Is it worth considering to buy or should I pass?

reddit.com
u/Practical_Eye_5683 — 3 months ago

Elderly dog having changes in sleep habits

These last two weeks have been driving me a little bonkers. I first put it down to my dog's new human (brother moved in with me a year and a half ago and she now hangs out with him unless upset) being gone dog sitting for a family member.

Every night except the last three, she has been in and out and eating like crazy. It was like her schedule flipped, sleep all day, eat and spend time outside at night. Her food consumption hasn't changed too much... she still eats between one and three bowls a day, but normally keeps to two. I feed her like a cat, always has food down since she only eats when hungry. If is a one bowl day, she will typically eat three the next day nibbling here and there. Now I used to not refill/top up her bowl after 7pm but that has changed just so I could get better sleep.

I thought she was finally settled from my brother being gone because I finally started getting to sleep through the past three days until last night... she wanted out. I fell back asleep for 20min and freaked out because she never told me she wanted back in. I went out and called for her, took her five minutes to decide she was okay with coming in, 10min later she wanted back out. I refused at first and each time she would lay on top of me for ten minutes before I finally caved after an hour of her being insistent. She never asked to come back in.

My alarm went off and I went looking for her and found her in the dirt. See picture. She doesnt appear to be in pain (does get stiff hips from time to time...), the peptides i am giving her for her skin issues (kpv/ghk-cu( just cycled off) seem to still be working. She has had skin issues for a year and a half(vet was no help). She is no more clingy than before, outside of being more demanding than normal and not accepting my sleep schedule like she used to.

She used to love spending hours in the backyard during the day and sleep under the shed when she got too hot, but in the last 3 years hates being left outside for more than 10minutes. She has never stayed outside all night and was always back in quick once the sun set.

She is 12yrs old... possibly a full bred ridgeback without the ridge, but was never tested to confirm. I adopted her 10yrs ago from the pound. I am terrified to take her back to the vet. What should I do? Do I need for her to go to the vet? Earliest I can do is Tuesday and really worried about leaving her this weekend while I attend a wedding out of town.

u/Practical_Eye_5683 — 3 months ago