u/SDBcop

Je fais tourner mon scanner de volume sur tout le tape canadien chaque jour de bourse, puis je trie le signal du bruit à la main. Cette semaine : 284 flags de volume, 11 analyses complètes, et 7 passes enregistrées avant les résultats.

La découverte : un spin-out d’uranium orphelin sur le TSXV — Verdera Energy (V.V / VUECF aux US). enCore Energy a remis ses actifs d’uranium au Nouveau-Mexique à ses actionnaires via une société cotée en Venture, et des milliers de détenteurs se sont retrouvés avec un microcap qu’ils n’avaient pas choisi. La vente forcée, c’est du mispricing classique. Un commentateur a ensuite soulevé l’héritage Navajo sur le terrain, j’ai vérifié chaque fait, et j’ai coupé mes propres estimations de upside le même jour.

Les pass:

• Grit Metals (FIN.V) — 47x volume, +25%, zéro nouvelle, firme de awareness payée depuis février : pattern de promo, passé, plat depuis.

• Primary Hydrogen (HDRO.V) — 234x volume en même temps qu’ils fixaient leur financement à 0,60 $ contre un marché à ~1,12 $ : passé le même jour.

• Aegis Brands (AEG.TO) — en baisse de 20 % sur des ventes faibles : les couteaux qui tombent, ce n’est pas de l’asymétrie.

La leçon : mon pass permanent sur les juridictions chinoises, Minco Silver (MSV.TO), a fait +12 % vendredi. Je n’y touche toujours pas. Les règles que tu abandonnes les jours verts n’ont jamais été des règles.

Le bilan : 6 appels datés, moyenne de +17.7% — incluant un -3 % et un plat. Les gagnants ont battu l’XGD de 15 à 33 points sur la même période.

Tout est horodaté avant les résultats, parce qu’un track record que tu ne peux pas vérifier, c’est juste une histoire.

Pas un conseil — ma propre lecture. Heureux de répondre à vos questions sur n’importe lequel.

My week scanning the entire TSX/TSX-V tape for unusual volume — 6 dated calls averaging +17.7%, losses included

I run a volume scanner on the full Canadian tape every trading day, then sort signal from noise by hand. My week: 284 volume flags, 11 full write-ups, 7 passes logged before outcomes.

The find: a TSXV-listed uranium spin-out orphan — Verdera Energy (TSXV: V, US: VUECF). enCore Energy handed its New Mexico uranium assets to its own shareholders through a Venture-listed vehicle, and thousands of holders got a microcap they never chose. Forced selling is textbook mispricing. A commenter then flagged the Navajo uranium legacy on the ground, I verified every fact, and cut my own upside numbers the same day.

The passes: Grit Metals (FIN.V) — 47x volume, +25%, zero news, paid awareness firm on retainer since February: promo pattern, passed, flat since. Primary Hydrogen (HDRO.V) — 234x volume while pricing its raise at $0.60 against a ~$1.12 market: same-day pass. Aegis Brands (AEG.TO) — down 20% on weak same-store sales: falling knives aren’t asymmetry.

The lesson: my permanent China-jurisdiction pass, Minco Silver (MSV.TO), ripped 12% Friday. Still not touching it. Rules you override on green days were never rules.

The ledger: 6 dated calls, +17.7% average — including a -3% and a flat one. The winners beat XGD by 15-33 points each over the same period. Everything is timestamped before outcomes, because a track record you can’t verify is just a story.

Not advice — my own read. Happy to answer questions on any of it.

Every trading day our scanner watches the full TSX + TSX-V tape (plus curated US lists) for unusual volume, then judgment sorts the signal from the noise.

This week: 284 volume flags, 11 full write-ups, 7 passes logged. Here's the honest ledger.

THE FIND: a uranium spin-out orphan (Verdera) — enCore handed its New Mexico assets to shareholders who never chose them, and that forced selling is textbook structural mispricing. Best part: a commenter from r/Uraniumsqueeze flagged the Navajo uranium legacy (Church Rock 1979, the 2005 mining ban), we verified every fact, strengthened the red flag and CUT our own upside probabilities the same day. That's the loop working — thank you.

THE PASSES (receipts attached): a promo-driven 47x volume spike with zero news and a paid awareness firm — passed, flat since. A 234x monster in a
natural-hydrogen microcap whose financing was just cut down and priced 45% below market — passed same day. A -20% restaurant capitulation on weak
same-store sales — passed; falling knives on deteriorating fundamentals aren't asymmetry. All passes are dated and logged before outcomes. Judge us in a month.

THE LESSON: our permanent China pass ripped 12% Friday. We're fine with that. Jurisdiction rules aren't performance predictions — they're what lets you sleep when a policy headline gaps something down 60% overnight. A system you override on green days isn't a system.

THE LEDGER: our six active buy-rated positions average +17.7% — losers included and published (our worst is -3.3%, and yes it's shown). Each is dated at our entry and benchmarked against XGD (or the TSX for non-miners) over its own holding period: five of six beat their benchmark, four of them by 15 to 33 points.

Full transparency: our #1 conviction, Troilus, is a position we've held since November 2025 (+49% since, vs +16% for the gold-miners index); the newer names are dated from our June calls. The full analyses with their 2x/5x/10x pathways and probability estimates are member-side.

Educational only, never financial advice. Always do your own DD.

Friday our volume scanner flagged Minco Silver (MSV.TO) — up 12% on 14x its normal volume, riding silver’s move. We’ve had it as a permanent pass since June. The reason is one line: the assets are in China, and our jurisdiction rules exclude it. Full stop.

So the uncomfortable question: does a +12% day mean the pass was wrong?

No — and I’d argue understanding why matters more than any single pick. Jurisdiction rules aren’t performance predictions. They’re risk architecture. A China-asset silver play can double from here and we still won’t own it, because the exact same feature that lets it rip on a green tape lets it gap down 60% on a policy headline you can’t see coming, overnight, with no recourse. You don’t get to keep the upside of that coin and skip the downside — it’s one coin.

The hard part of having rules isn’t writing them. It’s watching a name you excluded go up and NOT overriding yourself. A system you abandon on green days was never a system — it was a mood.

So it’s logged, dated, public: we passed, it ripped, the rule stands. If it doubles, the rule still stands. That’s the trade-off we chose, eyes open.

Curious what others do here — do you have hard exclusion rules (jurisdictions, sectors, structures), or do you evaluate everything case by case?

Educational only, never financial advice.

25k contest was yesterday and app still tell me to comeback later to see if I won.

I contacted support and they telling me I need a managed fund account (I have multiple saving/checking and investment fund managed by myself)

And my spouse was able to check reward but not me…

Anyone else with similar issue and talking with confused support?

***Logged out and it worked… 15$ to start a WS managed fund 🤡

Quick update for anyone following our process. We normally scan Canadian markets (gold and miners are our core), but with Canada closed for the holiday we ran our scanner on US markets for the first time — same discipline: unusual volume first, then judgment.

The biggest volume of the day was Regencell (RGC). On paper, a huge move. In reality: zero revenue, a billion-dollar valuation, an ultra-low float, and a run that already collapsed more than 70% this month. A high-volume bounce in something like that isn’t a setup, it’s the exit. We passed in seconds.

The one that actually earned a look was Guardant Health (GH) — the category leader in blood-based cancer testing. It moved on a real FDA approval plus new UnitedHealth coverage for its screening test, backed by a wave of analyst upgrades.

That’s a real catalyst, not a meme.

One caveat: it gapped to five-year highs on the news, and we don’t chase the catalyst-day gap — we’d rather wait for a pullback that holds.

The point isn’t to tell anyone to buy or sell (we don’t do that). It’s the method: the biggest number on the screen is rarely the best idea. Volume finds candidates; judgment separates the signal from the mania.

Educational only, not advice. Always do your own due diligence. Full write-up is on our site.

Welcome. This is a community for investors hunting high-conviction plays — gold and critical-metals juniors, small caps, equities, and the macro that moves them.

The idea is simple: most of us don’t have time to scan the whole market every day. So here we share the work — the names worth a closer look, the reasoning behind them, and just as important, the ones we pass on and why.

What you’ll find here:

•	Open market discussion — what’s moving and why, every day

•	Free sample reports, like our recent West Point Gold call

•	Educational breakdowns and honest post-mortems on past calls

Our full daily read, our ranked picks with Buy/Sell ratings, and the deep-dive research are for members at thebullishedge.com. This community is where we talk markets in the open — the members area is where we share exactly what we’re buying.

Ground rules: disclose your positions, keep it civil, and remember everything here is educational, never financial advice. Always do your own DD.

To see the kind of work we do, here’s a free deep-dive report on a recent call (West Point Gold — up ~18% the day after we flagged it): thebullishedge.com/blog/west-point-gold-wpg-free-report

Glad you’re here. Drop an intro below — what are you watching right now?

Hey r/ValueInvesting

Quick update on WPG.V (West Point Gold).

On June 23 we highlighted it as a tier-1 US gold explorer (Arizona + Nevada) with a strategic agreement with Kinross and a maiden resource expected later in 2026.

Today the stock jumped +18.5% after a strong drill result at Gold Chain:

• 66.2m @ 6.57 g/t Au, including 20.7m @ 18.25 g/t Au at NE Tyro

• Hole extends the zone past 250m depth and remains open

• 21 holes still pending for the maiden resource

Our take: Solid de-risking step on a funded explorer in a tier-1 jurisdiction. We raised our internal rating and continue to hold. Risks remain (pre-resource, dilution, jurisdiction), so sizing is important.

Educational only. Not financial advice. Always do your own DD.

Hey everyone,

Quick update on WPG.V (West Point Gold).

On June 23 we highlighted it as a tier-1 US gold explorer (Arizona + Nevada) with a strategic agreement with Kinross and a maiden resource expected later in 2026.

Today the stock jumped +18.5% after a strong drill result at Gold Chain:

• 66.2m @ 6.57 g/t Au, including 20.7m @ 18.25 g/t Au at NE Tyro

• Hole extends the zone past 250m depth and remains open

• 21 holes still pending for the maiden resource

Our take: Solid de-risking step on a funded explorer in a tier-1 jurisdiction. We raised our internal rating and continue to hold. Risks remain (pre-resource, dilution, jurisdiction), so sizing is important.

Educational only. Not financial advice. Always do your own DD.

What are your thoughts on WPG.V or similar funded gold juniors right now?

Hey r/investing

Quick case study from today’s market action on the TSX-V. (Canadian venture market, my niche specialty)

One micro-cap name (**MIVO.V – now Miivo AI**) saw its volume explode **74x** its average.

The move? +3.9% on the day.

**What drove it?** A name change riding the AI theme, combined with newly announced investor relations and marketing deals (plus an earlier acquisition).

No drill result. No major contract. No earnings beat.

This is a classic example of promotion-driven volume rather than conviction buying. Lots of churn, little directional follow-through.

**Lesson** : High volume spikes can be a flashlight, but they are not the full verdict. It’s important to look at the catalyst behind the volume. Rebrands + paid IR campaigns often precede dilution and tend to fade quickly.

Always important to separate real accumulation from noise.

What are your thoughts on these kinds of volume spikes? Have you seen similar patterns lately?

Hey r/ValueInvesting
,
Quick case study from today’s market action on the TSX-V. (Canadian venture market, my niche specialty)

One micro-cap name (MIVO.V – now Miivo AI) saw its volume explode 74x its average.

The move? +3.9% on the day.

What drove it? A name change riding the AI theme, combined with newly announced investor relations and marketing deals (plus an earlier acquisition).

No drill result. No major contract. No earnings beat.

This is a classic example of promotion-driven volume rather than conviction buying. Lots of churn, little directional follow-through.

Lesson : High volume spikes can be a flashlight, but they are not the full verdict. It’s important to look at the catalyst behind the volume. Rebrands + paid IR campaigns often precede dilution and tend to fade quickly.

Always important to separate real accumulation from noise.

What are your thoughts on these kinds of volume spikes? Have you seen similar patterns lately?

The Bullish Edge

Hey r/CanadaStocks

Quick intro: I run **The Bullish Edge**, a high-conviction investment research service focused on TSX/TSX-V stocks.

Every day we scan for unusual volume and analyze to separate real opportunities from noise.

Here’s a real example from today’s scan:

**MIVO.V – Miivo (now Miivo Ai)**
Micro-cap AI software play.

**The story behind the 74x volume spike:** A name change to ride the AI theme + newly announced investor relations and marketing deals (plus an earlier Dubai acquisition). No drill result, no big contract, no earnings.

Price moved only +3.9%. Classic churn, not conviction.

**We passed**. This is exactly the kind of promoted noise our process is designed to filter out.

**Key takeaway:** Volume can be a flashlight, but it’s not the full verdict. We look for real conviction, not hype.

Full daily analysis available at https://thebullishedge.com not financial advice – always do your own DD).

What are your thoughts on these kinds of volume spikes? Have you seen similar pumps lately?