The Red Prince's game is a forced win, actually.

I'm not sure how the star-shaped board would effect how the game works, but I just assumed it was just a fancier rectangular board.

We're also going to ignore the fact that apparently players can make multiple moves per turn (The Red Prince complains about Ruby taking up his turn, after all), and that the pieces duel for capturing. Obviously if the pieces have to duel, then it's a forced win for red since I'm pretty sure the red pieces are always stronger than the white ones.

Another thing I'm just going to gloss over is that the pawns would just get stuck behind one another, and since the board is 8 tiles wide, that means, technically speaking, the most number of pawns you can get to the other side of the board is 8. So I'm gonna modify the rule to be "number of pawns stuck on the other side of the board."

Pawn games are usually either a forced win or extremely tedious. Hexapawn, the most famous example of pawn-only chess games is a forced win for the second player.

In fact, I will garuntee you that every chess game that's only pawns is either a forced win or a very tedious game with mindless trading of material until the last 15 moves, where zugzwang ideas finally appear.

Honestly, I'm glad it got turned into a fight scene, because there is so much wrong with the game.

The game starts off with a completely forced opening. Since there's only a two square gap between pawns, and the pawns can't defend each other because of how they move, the game will always be like this after 17 moves:

https://preview.redd.it/h5suc3pfsvuh1.png?width=530&format=png&auto=webp&s=39764a1916e7a735e52da864c4055d792586fe4c

If you're wondering why it won't be the other "spike pattern," it's because this pattern maximizes the number of pawns closer to the centre, making it the best set of moves. However, even if the opening looks slightly different, it wouldn't matter because Black just immediately wins 8 pawns.

In the position shown above, it's White's turn. Notice how every legal move results in losing a pawn? This is what the board looks like on move 25

https://preview.redd.it/33raokz2tvuh1.png?width=527&format=png&auto=webp&s=49c1054bba4183f3014ca38c170eb0235e3aface

and as you've probably guess, this is what the board looks like after the 49th move

https://preview.redd.it/gxzwco4mtvuh1.png?width=525&format=png&auto=webp&s=ffd1b740cfd0e2b338913f0f61121c906694ed52

And this is where things get a big finnicky. Unless I'm mistaken, stalemate rules are never mentioned, meaning if Black captures White's last pawn here, it could just be a draw. But it's not like that matters anyway, since it's pretty obvious that the player with 28 passed pawns is going to win.

Obviously, since it's White to play here, if capturing all pieces means checkmate, then the whole game is an M50. If the stalemate scenario I mentioned above applies, then it's M54, since it will only take Black 4 more moves to push two pawns to the end of the board, and it doesn't take a genius to realize that 2>1.

So at this point, we just don't even know why players even try to play against The Red Prince. The forced win in 54 moves is obvious with all 54 moves being, well, forced for White. And you can't even blame the them for cheating since that's the only way to win as the first-moving player. The game's just a glorified version of Hexapawn.

The only 2 games of Hexapawn. The left image shows White pushing the left pawn first (pushing the right pawn first is just a mirrored version of this), and the right image shows White pushing the middle pawn first. Both games end in Black winning.

Changing the pieces out for normal pawns does make it a bit better, but, also as I mentioned, that would just make the game needlessly boring with no strategy at all for the first 90% of the game.

Of cours, as I mentioned earlier, the star-shaped board could possibly have some effect on the game, but since we never actually properly see the wedges change something, along with the fact that the whole game is just pawns, the game would probably still be a forced win for red, anyway.

u/ShiningGemstone1 — 4 days ago

Theory: Meeple won't be the "villain" of Season 4.

Season 4 is about identity. It's about the characters finding their place in life. Fan says that's the purpose of "the game," and both Paper and Starfruit found their "place in life."

The Meeple stuff is simply a motivator for pushing the cast out of their comfort zone, which in turn helps them find their identity and purpose.

And, come to think of it, a third of the episodes are done, and MeTag's flashback is the only time Meeple is even brought up. If the company was truly supposed to be "the villain," you'd think they'd have shown up, already, no? Not to mention that making Meeple be the big bad would just be building off of Season 2's plot. And Season 2 is done, complete, over.

u/ShiningGemstone1 — 1 month ago
▲ 457 r/AmongUs

Among Us sign language

Apparently newer players don't know these so I decided to post this.

u/ShiningGemstone1 — 2 months ago
▲ 70 r/What

Is she ok?

not sure what Arby's has to do with an Internet joke but ok

edit: I'm the top user. My friend's the bottom user.

u/ShiningGemstone1 — 2 months ago
▲ 57 r/AmongUs

Found this in my closet just now

Been there since 2021. Had to use the paperbinder to hold it down bc it had been rolled up for so long

u/ShiningGemstone1 — 2 months ago
▲ 147 r/AmongUs

I watched the first episode of AU show. Here's my suspect list.

I'm too broke to watch the rest of the series sadge.

don't any of you dare spoil it for me, though.

u/ShiningGemstone1 — 3 months ago
▲ 355 r/AmongUs

This guy has been here since 2019. What do we name him?

For those that don't know, look closely at the middle stall.

And no, Chary's creepypasta doesn't count.

Edit: hold up, why is there a wires panel behind what's supposed to be a toilet

u/ShiningGemstone1 — 3 months ago