Reddit vs AppLovin vs Palantir

All three stocks have been undergoing a hypergrowth stage of business. I want to go through each of their business models because many people in this subreddit seem not to really understand what they do, how they make money, and most importantly, what their edge actually is.

Name Reddit AppLovin Palantir
Q2 2026 Revenue $805M $1.92B $1.94B
Revenue Growth 61% 53% 93%
GAAP Net Income $253M $1.27B ~$1.06B
Core Business Advertising Performance advertising Enterprise/Gov software
What I like Community + intent AXON Deeply embedded software
Main concern Execution Algorithm risk Valuation / competition

Reddit

First, let us start with Reddit. Reddit's primary way forward really is the advertising business. This is the core lifeblood of the company, and they have now proven themselves with the 8th consecutive quarter above 60% revenue growth YoY. EPS also grew more than 150% in the recent quarter.

One thing I think many people misunderstand is how advertising actually works. Many people just assume that someone has to purchase the product before the advertiser pays, but that is not how most advertising businesses work. Typical advertising is charged by impression, click, or in some cases actual conversion.

  • CPM (Cost Per Mille / 1,000 impressions): advertisers pay for every 1,000 times an ad is shown
  • CPC (Cost Per Click): advertisers pay each time someone clicks on the ad
  • CPA (Cost Per Acquisition): advertisers pay only when a specific action happens (install, signup, purchase, etc.)

The main models are quite simple. CPM means paying for impressions, CPC means paying when somebody clicks, while CPA is more performance-based and depends on an actual action such as an install, registration or purchase. This difference matters because an advertisement does not necessarily need to immediately convert somebody into a buyer. Sometimes the most valuable thing is simply putting the impression in front of exactly the right person. Converting that impression into a purchase is ultimately the seller's job.

For instance, say you developed a game or have a clothing website. You pay a publisher like Reddit to get users to see your product or visit your website. Once they land on your website, whether they eventually purchase something is largely between you and that customer. Reddit has already provided you the traffic.

Simply to improve brand exposure (CPM).

This is where I think Reddit advertising is one of the most unique in the industry. The audience is massive, but more importantly the audience has already separated itself into very specific communities. Look at u / bloomberg. They have been publishing a lot on Reddit recently, but they are not just posting anywhere. They are actually quite smart and picky about finding the right community for each article.

For instance, Bloomberg publishes a piece about drones or some new military technology. Most broad readers probably don't care how sophisticated that weapon is, but put it into r/army or r/Military and suddenly you are putting that story in front of a large group of people who already care about the subject. Next they publish something about food prices or household finances and put it into subreddit r/MiddleClassFinance  r/farming or r/food. On inflation, you can post it to r/inflation. Obviously these Bloomberg posts are organic content rather than paid ads, but my point is that this shows exactly why Reddit's structure is so valuable for advertising.

Another example is a game developer who recently developed his own game and wants to make some passive income. Usually it is quite difficult for a new developer to make money because there is no precise way to find the first group of users. Reddit offers them a unique solution through communities such as r/gamedev. You already have people there who are game developers or serious gamers. Sometimes developers can offer vouchers or access to the game and receive feedback. These are not random people. Some of them are hardcore developers, so their feedback can actually be quite valuable.

The same logic works everywhere. There are people looking for advice on divorce, so a divorce lawyer can advertise r/Divorce. There are new moms looking for advice about being a new mom, so businesses selling related products can advertise r/Mommit. r/beauty is now a very hot community where mega brands such as L'Oréal naturally want to be part of the conversation. Communities around brands like Victoria's Secret can be used to energize their most loyal customers r/victoriasecrets. The power of Reddit advertising is really underestimated here.

And actually, this post itself gives a pretty good example. Suppose I have a book on fundamental analysis. Open this comment section, 30mins later, I will find the first 10 users arguing with me and check their Reddit account ages. I would not be surprised if 9/10 have already been on Reddit for more than 3 years. Most of you read investment communities, talk about stocks and probably have brokerage accounts. If I wanted to advertise some investment research product, all of you would already be my extremely precise target audience. That is what I mean when I say advertising is not always about immediate purchase intent. Sometimes getting the right impression in front of exactly the right group is already extremely valuable.

Then there is data licensing. To be honest, I really do not view this as seriously as many other Reddit investors do. It gets hyped because Reddit owns an asset that most other companies simply don't have: a huge amount of fresh human discussion. There could be setbacks from lawsuits or companies refusing to pay for data access. Reddit can update policies, create stronger technical restrictions, continue fighting scraping, and fix legal loopholes. But ultimately this data is hosted and controlled by Reddit. As long as AI companies want fresh Reddit data for training, retrieval or inference, I think Reddit will continue to have leverage. I just don't need this part of the business to make the investment thesis work.

AppLovin

I have been a very early investor in AppLovin. I first became interested when they failed to stop the merger between Unity and ironSource. AppLovin looked pretty hopeless at the time. They owned a few dozen popular mobile games and a lot of the market treated them like a gaming company without much future.

It happened that I was not lazy when researching their financial statements. What caught my attention was management aggressively buying back their own shares when the market had almost given up on the company. I started a small position there, although I have to admit I never fully understood how powerful their advertising business could become until much later, especially after they eventually sold the entire gaming department.

Their transformational change really came from technological innovation, particularly AXON. AppLovin had accumulated enormous amounts of internal data through its portfolio of mobile games. They had years of information about gamer behavior, advertising, installs, purchases and monetization. Then machine learning (AI) used all of this information to make their advertising engine much better.

One person I think is worth paying attention to is their recently prompted CTO Giovanni Ge, who previously worked as a machine-learning engineer at Meta. Obviously I am not saying AXON is the work of one single person, but I do think AppLovin today is much more dependent on its technical advantage than Reddit is.

AppLovin is primarily a performance advertising business. The important thing here is that the advertiser cares about actual return. If AppLovin can identify exactly which users are likely to download an app or spend money, its customers make more money and therefore AppLovin makes more money. In some sense their interests are very closely aligned: if the customer earns more from the advertising campaign, AppLovin earns more as well. So far they are the best in the business, which is why their profit margin is so insanely high.

But this is also where I see the risk. If their algorithm stops being the best and another much better algorithm comes onto the market, AppLovin could be left scrambling. If important technical people leave and eventually create a better advertising system, advertisers have no reason to remain loyal to AppLovin just because it is AppLovin. They care about which platform gives them the best return. This does not mean AXON is easy to replace, but I think AppLovin's moat is much more dependent on continuing to stay technologically ahead.

Palantir

Palantir is basically a defense/government and enterprise SaaS company. I actually like the company (insane growth) but I have never invested in it because it has always been expensive.

The government side of Palantir is obviously very important, particularly Gotham and its work with defense and government agencies. At the same time, its commercial business has now become much larger than it used to be, so I would not describe Palantir as simply a defense company anymore. Its U.S. commercial business is now growing extremely quickly as well.

My concern with Palantir is more about how much future success is already priced into the stock. The company is being valued as one of the major winners of the AI/software era, so the market is already expecting extremely strong execution for a long period of time.

I also think there is a real long-term question around general AI systems. Claude, OpenAI and other AI platforms are becoming increasingly capable of working with company data, building software and automating workflows. Maybe Palantir becomes the company that controls this layer and becomes even more powerful. But there is also a possibility that increasingly capable general AI makes some traditional SaaS work much easier and cheaper. Then there come the issues with political backlash when Trump leaves office. 

Overall

Overall, I think both AppLovin and Palantir can continue doing very well in the short-to-medium term, probably the next 1-2 years.

But Reddit is still the one I prefer as the real long-term investment.

The reason is that AppLovin's advantage depends heavily on remaining technologically ahead, while Palantir is already priced for enormous future success.

Reddit, on the other hand, already owns the asset I care about: the communities themselves and user habits. You can build another website that looks like Reddit, but recreating subreddit like gamedev, army, MiddleClassFinance, beauty, valueinvesting and thousands of other communities with years of posts, users and accumulated discussion is much harder.

That is why, out of these three, Reddit has my strongest long-term conviction on.

____

Read my piece:

I Still Don't Understand Why Reddit Is This Cheap Compared to Everything Else.

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 15 hours ago

I Still Don't Understand Why Reddit Is This Cheap Compared to Everything Else.

There are not many businesses that actually have a strong moat in their own category.

Look at some of the companies the market is willing to value at huge premiums:

Company Market Cap Latest Q Revenue YoY Growth GAAP Net Margin Competition
Cloudflare (NET) $107B $696M +36% -24% AWS, Akamai, Fastly
Roblox (RBLX) $27B $1.5B +36% -12% Fortnite (Epic), Minecraft
Spotify (SPOT) $103B €4.78B +14% +11% Apple Music, YouTube Music, Amazon Music
Unity (U) $20B $546M +24% -4% Unreal Engine (Epic), Applovin
Snowflake (SNOW) $112B $1.39B +33% -21% Databricks, AWS Redshift, Google BigQuery, MSFT Fabric
Reddit (RDDT) $32B $805M +61% +31% TikTok, Meta, Google Search/YouTube

Aug. 18, 2026.

I'm not saying these are bad companies. My point is simply: look at what the market is willing to pay for them, then look at Reddit.

Reddit just reported $805M revenue, +61% YoY — its 8th consecutive quarter above 60% growth. Gross margin was 91.3%, net income $253M / 31% margin, adjusted EBITDA $343M / 43% margin, and FCF $261M. It also has $2.8B cash + marketable securities, with no debt showing on the balance sheet.

Meanwhile NET is valued at ~$107B while still GAAP unprofitable. SNOW is ~$112B while growing roughly half as fast as Reddit and still GAAP unprofitable. Spotify is ~$103B growing 14%.

Yet Reddit is sitting at only ~$32B.

And Reddit's moat is something I think people continue to underestimate. It isn't just another social media app. TikTok is short-form video, Meta is influencer business, Google/YouTube is search and video discovery; Reddit is different — its users are discussion-heavy and community-focused, often coming to research, compare, ask questions and hear real human opinions. There is basically no scaled direct competitor offering the same forum/community product with Reddit's reach.

Users are sticky. Content compounds. Advertising is scaling. Data licensing is still very early.

The only company really comparable to Reddit right now is Palantir.

Palantir (PLTR) Reddit (RDDT)
Market Cap ~$420B
Latest Q Revenue $1.94B
Revenue Growth +92.8%
Operating Income $912M
Gross Margin ~85%
Core Moat Enterprise software

Palantir is an incredible business, but the market is valuing it at ~$420B — more than 13x Reddit's valuation, while revenue is only 2 times that of Reddit.

And PLTR is still fundamentally a software company. Risk involves AI agents like Claude Cowork could still compete with parts of what enterprise software does.

Reddit is different. Claude can build software. It cannot recreate decades of human communities, discussions and user habits.

If PLTR deserves $420B, RDDT at ~$32B looks extremely cheap.

At market cap of 32B and $160, I think Reddit is a steal and market is mispricing this stock.

Reddit is a Strong Buy (PT $550).

___________________________________________________________________________________________
Added on 08/19/26:

Everyone agrees that Reddit advertsing business is not as matured as Meta.

In 2025, Meta advertising business generated 200B and will be hitting 250B this year (2026).

On the flip side, Reddit advertising revenue is expected to reach 3B+ this year, just assuming Reddit to reach 5% of Meta advertising of 2026, which is 12.5B, with a conservative net margin of 30%, thats makes 3.8B net income, give it or take 20-30PE, equivalent to 78B-114B market cap. But the reality is that advertising net margin is usually 50%+, so a slightly bullish case make Reddit 125-190B market cap.
___________________________________________________________________________________________

New piece, please have a read:
Reddit vs AppLovin vs Palantir

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 22 hours ago

I Still Don't Understand Why Reddit Is This Cheap Compared to Everything Else.

There are not many businesses that actually have a strong moat in their own category.

Look at some of the companies the market is willing to value at huge premiums:

Company Market Cap Latest Q Revenue YoY Growth GAAP Net Margin Competition
Cloudflare (NET) $107B $696M +36% -24% AWS, Akamai, Fastly
Roblox (RBLX) $27B $1.5B +36% -12% Fortnite (Epic), Minecraft
Spotify (SPOT) $103B €4.78B +14% +11% Apple Music, YouTube Music, Amazon Music
Unity (U) $20B $546M +24% -4% Unreal Engine (Epic), Applovin
Snowflake (SNOW) $112B $1.39B +33% -21% Databricks, AWS Redshift, Google BigQuery, MSFT Fabric
Reddit (RDDT) $32B $805M +61% +31% TikTok, Meta, Google Search/YouTube

Aug. 18, 2026.

I'm not saying these are bad companies. My point is simply: look at what the market is willing to pay for them, then look at Reddit.

Reddit just reported $805M revenue, +61% YoY — its 8th consecutive quarter above 60% growth. Gross margin was 91.3%, net income $253M / 31% margin, adjusted EBITDA $343M / 43% margin, and FCF $261M. It also has $2.8B cash + marketable securities, with no debt showing on the balance sheet.

Meanwhile NET is valued at ~$107B while still GAAP unprofitable. SNOW is ~$112B while growing roughly half as fast as Reddit and still GAAP unprofitable. Spotify is ~$103B growing 14%.

Yet Reddit is sitting at only ~$32B.

And Reddit's moat is something I think people continue to underestimate. It isn't just another social media app. TikTok is short-form video, Meta is influencer business, Google/YouTube is search and video discovery; Reddit is different — its users are discussion-heavy and community-focused, often coming to research, compare, ask questions and hear real human opinions. There is basically no scaled direct competitor offering the same forum/community product with Reddit's reach.

Users are sticky. Content compounds. Advertising is scaling. Data licensing is still very early.

The only company really comparable to Reddit right now is Palantir.

Palantir (PLTR) Reddit (RDDT)
Market Cap ~$420B ~$32B
Latest Q Revenue $1.94B $805M
Revenue Growth +92.8% +61%
Operating Income $912M $232M
Gross Margin ~85% ~91%
Core Moat Enterprise software Communities + User habits

Palantir is an incredible business, but the market is valuing it at ~$420B — more than 13x Reddit's valuation, while revenue is only 2 times that of Reddit.

And PLTR is still fundamentally a software company. Risk involves AI agents like Claude Cowork could still compete with parts of what enterprise software does.

Reddit is different. Claude can build software. It cannot recreate decades of human communities, discussions and user habits.

If PLTR deserves $420B, RDDT at ~$32B looks extremely cheap.

At market cap of 32B and $160, I think Reddit is a steal and market is mispricing this stock.

Reddit is a Strong Buy (PT $550).

___________________________________________________________________________________________
Added on 08/19/26:

Everyone agrees that Reddit advertsing business is not as matured as Meta.

In 2025, Meta advertising business generated 200B and will be hitting 250B this year (2026).

On the flip side, Reddit advertising revenue is expected to reach 3B+ this year, just assuming Reddit to reach 5% of Meta advertising of 2026, which is 12.5B, with a conservative net margin of 30%, thats makes 3.8B net income, give it or take 20-30PE, equivalent to 78B-114B market cap. But the reality is that advertising net margin is usually 50%+, so a slightly bullish case make Reddit 125-190B market cap.
___________________________________________________________________________________________

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 23 hours ago

Warning: Fake $RDDT Crypto Is Using Reddit’s Name and Logo on X

Recently I’ve spotted quite a few accounts on X pushing a crypto token called $RDDT, apparently trying to associate it with Reddit.

https://x.com/i/communities/2020462639546081472

As far as I can tell, this token has nothing to do with Reddit the company or Reddit stock (NYSE: RDDT). It looks like another crypto project using Reddit’s name, ticker and reputation to attract buyers.

This raises my eyebrow because Reddit has spent years building a very recognisable public brand, and I can easily see people getting confused and thinking this token is somehow officially connected to the company.

If anyone here knows Reddit staff, please spread the word and make them aware of it. I’m posting this mainly because I think Reddit should at least know its brand is being used this way.

And obviously, do your own research before buying anything claiming to be connected to Reddit.

reddit.com

What’s up with Bloomberg posting so much on Reddit lately?

I’ve been seeing a crazy number of Bloomberg posts on Reddit lately, posted directly from Bloomberg’s own account, u/bloomberg.

Is Bloomberg paying Reddit for this level of distribution? Reddit must be driving some serious traffic to Bloomberg for them to be posting this aggressively.

And they’re not just posting randomly. They seem pretty smart and selective about it, finding the right subreddit for each story instead of just spamming links everywhere.

Some examples:

https://www.reddit.com/r/MiddleClassFinance/s/dNsgsrsQX6

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/s/eDNHgr3LiI

https://www.reddit.com/r/Military/s/ezIdKjW0ne

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 2 days ago

How I Get to PT $550 RDDT in 2027 — The Math Behind My Price Target

In my last post I gave my Reddit price targets: $550 in 2027 and around $900 by FY2028.

A lot of serious investors questioned the math, and some of the valuation math in my previous post was not explained correctly. So I will explain here.

For valuation reference, I look at companies such as Cloudflare and, historically, The Trade Desk when the market was still giving very large premiums to strong growth. I am not saying they are perfect comps. I am using them as examples of what the market can pay for a high-growth, high-margin internet business.

First, the actual starting point.

2025 actual

Revenue: $2.203B
Net income: $530M
Net margin: 24.1%

Reddit then produced a 30.7% net margin in Q1 2026 and 31.4% in Q2.

So for my model I simply use 30% net margin going forward. No margin expansion.

I also use roughly 207M diluted shares.

2026

Assume revenue grows 60% (based on Q1 & Q2):

Revenue: $3.52B
Net income at 30% margin: $1.06B
EPS: ~$5.11

For a 2026 year-end price, I would value Reddit mainly on 2027 earnings, not 2026 earnings.

2027

Assume growth slows to 50%:

Revenue: $5.29B
Net income: $1.59B
EPS: ~$7.66

But my 2027 price target should be based on 2028 forward earnings, because by late 2027 the market will care much more about what Reddit earns in 2028.

2028

Assume growth slows again to 40%:

Revenue: $7.40B
Net income: $2.22B
EPS: ~$10.73

Now the 2027 valuation becomes:

40x forward P/E = $429
45x = $483
50x = $536
52x = ~$558

So this is where my $550 target for 2027 actually comes from (assuming no margin expansion).

It requires Reddit to enter 2028 still growing around 40%+ and the market to value it at roughly 51–52x forward earnings.

2029

Assume another 40% growth year:

Revenue: $10.36B
Net income at 30% margin: $3.11B
EPS: ~$15.02

That gives the following FY2028 valuation on forward 2029 earnings:

40x = ~$601
45x = ~$676
50x = ~$751
60x = ~$901

So $900 by FY2028 is clearly the bull case. Again, assuming no margin expansion.

With no margin expansion, Reddit would need to maintain an approximately 60x forward P/E to get there.

There is another path though.

If Reddit eventually expands net margin toward 40%, then $10.36B revenue would produce roughly $4.15B net income, or about $20 EPS.

At that point:

$20 EPS × 45 P/E = ~$900

And considering Reddit already has a 90%+ gross margin and recently produced 40%+ adjusted EBITDA margins, I don't think significant long-term operating leverage is an absurd assumption.

So my targets are basically:

2027 base-ish bull case: $430–480
2027 strong bull case: ~$550

FY2028 base-ish bull case: $600–675
FY2028 strong bull case: $750+
FY2028 everything-goes-right case: ~$900

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 2 days ago

How I Get to PT $550 RDDT in 2027 — The Math Behind My Price Target

In my last post I gave my Reddit price targets: $550 in 2027 and around $900 by FY2028.

A lot of serious investors questioned the math, and some of the valuation math in my previous post was not explained correctly. So I will explain here.

For valuation reference, I look at companies such as Cloudflare and, historically, The Trade Desk when the market was still giving very large premiums to strong growth. I am not saying they are perfect comps. I am using them as examples of what the market can pay for a high-growth, high-margin internet business.

First, the actual starting point.

2025 actual

Revenue: $2.203B
Net income: $530M
Net margin: 24.1%

Reddit then produced a 30.7% net margin in Q1 2026 and 31.4% in Q2.

So for my model I simply use 30% net margin going forward. No margin expansion.

I also use roughly 207M diluted shares.

2026

Assume revenue grows 60% (based on Q1 & Q2):

Revenue: $3.52B
Net income at 30% margin: $1.06B
EPS: ~$5.11

For a 2026 year-end price, I would value Reddit mainly on 2027 earnings, not 2026 earnings.

2027

Assume growth slows to 50%:

Revenue: $5.29B
Net income: $1.59B
EPS: ~$7.66

But my 2027 price target should be based on 2028 forward earnings, because by late 2027 the market will care much more about what Reddit earns in 2028.

2028

Assume growth slows again to 40%:

Revenue: $7.40B
Net income: $2.22B
EPS: ~$10.73

Now the 2027 valuation becomes:

40x forward P/E = $429
45x = $483
50x = $536
52x = ~$558

So this is where my $550 target for 2027 actually comes from (assuming no margin expansion).

It requires Reddit to enter 2028 still growing around 40%+ and the market to value it at roughly 51–52x forward earnings.

2029

Assume another 40% growth year:

Revenue: $10.36B
Net income at 30% margin: $3.11B
EPS: ~$15.02

That gives the following FY2028 valuation on forward 2029 earnings:

40x = ~$601
45x = ~$676
50x = ~$751
60x = ~$901

So $900 by FY2028 is clearly the bull case. Again, assuming no margin expansion.

With no margin expansion, Reddit would need to maintain an approximately 60x forward P/E to get there.

There is another path though.

If Reddit eventually expands net margin toward 40%, then $10.36B revenue would produce roughly $4.15B net income, or about $20 EPS.

At that point:

$20 EPS × 45 P/E = ~$900

And considering Reddit already has a 90%+ gross margin and recently produced 40%+ adjusted EBITDA margins, I don't think significant long-term operating leverage is an absurd assumption.

So my targets are basically:

2027 base-ish bull case: $430–480
2027 strong bull case: ~$550

FY2028 base-ish bull case: $600–675
FY2028 strong bull case: $750+
FY2028 everything-goes-right case: ~$900

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 2 days ago

Reddit Doesn’t Need to Become the Next Meta to Win — But I Think It Will

Reddit went public on 21 March 2024. I was sceptical about them. But time and time again, they have proven themselves with solid financial performance:

Quarter Revenue YoY Growth Net Income Net Margin Adj. EBITDA EBITDA Margin
Q3 2024 $348M +68% $30M 8.6% $94M 27.0%
Q4 2024 $428M +71% $71M 16.6% $154M 36.1%
Q1 2025 $392M +61% $26M 6.7% $115M 29.4%
Q2 2025 $500M +78% $89M 17.9% $167M 33.4%
Q3 2025 $585M +68% $163M 27.8% $236M 40.3%
Q4 2025 $726M +70% $252M 34.7% $327M 45.1%
Q1 2026 $663M +69% $204M 30.7% $266M 40.1%
Q2 2026 $805M +61% $253M 31.4% $343M 42.6%

________

A lot of people don’t realize how low the bar actually is for Reddit to become an enormously successful company from here.

Think about it: how many consumer internet companies can grow this quickly while reaching real profitability at almost lightning speed?

Snapchat has struggled for years to generate consistent profits. Pinterest has built a solid business, but its growth trajectory has been much slower. Reddit, meanwhile, has gone from being viewed as an under-monetized internet forum to a rapidly growing, highly profitable advertising platform.

Comparing Reddit to Snapchat or Pinterest misses the point—both went public years ago and struggled for years to achieve consistent profitability.

Why?

I think the answer is much simpler than people make it out to be:

Reddit already has the users, the data, the engagement, and the culture. Management just needed to build the monetization machine around it.

Huffman is a strong CEO because he is product-first, not monetization-first. His reluctance to sacrifice user experience is exactly why Reddit still has so much monetization upside.

And this is where the Meta comparison becomes interesting.

Before Reddit went public, Steve Huffman and the board spent years assembling executives who had already helped solve many of these exact problems at Meta and other major technology companies.

Reddit has deliberately recruited people who already helped build Meta’s machine. CTO Amit Puntambekar previously held engineering leadership roles at Meta, working on platform scaling and products. CMO Jim Squires is even more directly relevant to the advertising thesis: at Meta, he served as VP of Business & Media for Instagram and led product marketing for both Facebook and Instagram—meaning he was directly involved in the systems and go-to-market strategy behind Meta’s advertising empire.

They are effectively running a playbook that has already worked before.

That is why I think comparing Reddit today with Facebook around its 2012 IPO is more useful than comparing Reddit with mature Meta today.

Facebook didn't become the Meta we know overnight. It progressively improved targeting, measurement, ad formats, mobile monetization, recommendation systems, advertiser tooling, and infrastructure.

Reddit is still near the beginning of that journey.

Management has effectively acknowledged that only a fraction of Reddit's user base is being fully monetized today. That means Reddit does not need some miraculous new product to justify substantial growth. It can grow simply by monetizing what it already has more effectively.

And then there is the second business hiding in plain sight:

data licensing.

Reddit owns one of the largest continuously updated collections of human conversation, opinion, product discussion, troubleshooting, recommendations, and real-world experiences on the internet.

That data becomes increasingly valuable as search engines and AI companies compete to answer questions with authentic human information.

The appointment of heavyweight legal leadership is particularly interesting to me. I don't view this simply as hiring another corporate lawyer. Reddit is entering a period where M&A, intellectual-property enforcement, platform access, and data-licensing negotiations could become strategically important.

They need someone capable of negotiating from a position of strength.

So when I look at Reddit, I see:

  • Massive global user distribution
  • An extremely difficult-to-replicate dataset
  • Rapid advertising monetization improvements
  • Very high gross margins
  • Experienced executives who have scaled similar businesses before
  • A technical founder/CEO who still thinks like a product builder
  • Data-licensing optionality
  • And potentially enormous room for capital allocation and M&A

That last point is where I think people may be dramatically underestimating what Reddit could eventually become.

Reddit does not necessarily have to remain one app.

Over the next several years, I could imagine Reddit building or acquiring an entire family of products: D-i-s-c-o-r-d-like communication, short-form video, payments, AI products, specialized communities, creator tools, search, and perhaps eventually its own foundation models or AI infrastructure.

Could D-i-s-c-o-r-d eventually become part of Reddit? I wouldn't rule it out.

Could Reddit launch its own TikTok-style product built around interests rather than identities? Absolutely.

Could Reddit build payments around communities and commerce? Again, completely plausible.

Could Reddit become a serious AI company? It already owns one of the ingredients AI companies desperately want: human-generated data at enormous scale.

And here's the important part:

Reddit may eventually be able to finance much of this expansion internally.

A highly scalable software platform with strong gross margins and growing free cash flow has enormous strategic flexibility. If management executes, Wall Street will also be more than willing to provide capital for sensible acquisitions.

That is how platform companies turn into empires.

My personal target remains roughly $550 sometime next year and around $900 by FY2028, assuming Reddit continues executing on advertising, margins, data licensing, and product expansion.

Obviously those numbers require execution and aren't guaranteed.

But my broader thesis doesn't depend on Reddit becoming perfect.

There is only one company in the entire U.S. stock market that can sustain ~60% revenue growth for eight consecutive quarters while reaching profitability so quickly (i.e., except chip hype NVDA).

The bar is much lower than people think.

Reddit already has the scarce assets: the users, the communities, the data, the brand, and the distribution.

Now it is finally building the machine that monetizes them.

I think we may be watching the early stages of another Meta-like wealth-creation story — except this time, the monetization playbook has already been written.

Long BULL REDDIT!!!!!!

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 3 days ago

Reddit Doesn’t Need to Become the Next Meta to Win — But I Think It Will

A lot of people don’t realize how low the bar actually is for Reddit to become an enormously successful company from here.

Think about it: how many consumer internet companies can grow this quickly while reaching real profitability at almost lightning speed?

Snapchat has struggled for years to generate consistent profits. Pinterest has built a solid business, but its growth trajectory has been much slower. Reddit, meanwhile, has gone from being viewed as an under-monetized internet forum to a rapidly growing, highly profitable advertising platform.

Comparing Reddit to Snapchat or Pinterest misses the point—both went public years ago and struggled for years to achieve consistent profitability.

Why?

I think the answer is much simpler than people make it out to be:

Reddit already has the users, the data, the engagement, and the culture. Management just needed to build the monetization machine around it.

Huffman is a strong CEO because he is product-first, not monetization-first. His reluctance to sacrifice user experience is exactly why Reddit still has so much monetization upside.

And this is where the Meta comparison becomes interesting.

Before Reddit went public, Steve Huffman and the board spent years assembling executives who had already helped solve many of these exact problems at Meta and other major technology companies.

Reddit has deliberately recruited people who already helped build Meta’s machine. CTO Amit Puntambekar previously held engineering leadership roles at Meta, working on platform scaling and products. CMO Jim Squires is even more directly relevant to the advertising thesis: at Meta, he served as VP of Business & Media for Instagram and led product marketing for both Facebook and Instagram—meaning he was directly involved in the systems and go-to-market strategy behind Meta’s advertising empire.

They are effectively running a playbook that has already worked before.

That is why I think comparing Reddit today with Facebook around its 2012 IPO is more useful than comparing Reddit with mature Meta today.

Facebook didn't become the Meta we know overnight. It progressively improved targeting, measurement, ad formats, mobile monetization, recommendation systems, advertiser tooling, and infrastructure.

Reddit is still near the beginning of that journey.

Management has effectively acknowledged that only a fraction of Reddit's user base is being fully monetized today. That means Reddit does not need some miraculous new product to justify substantial growth. It can grow simply by monetizing what it already has more effectively.

And then there is the second business hiding in plain sight:

data licensing.

Reddit owns one of the largest continuously updated collections of human conversation, opinion, product discussion, troubleshooting, recommendations, and real-world experiences on the internet.

That data becomes increasingly valuable as search engines and AI companies compete to answer questions with authentic human information.

The appointment of heavyweight legal leadership is particularly interesting to me. I don't view this simply as hiring another corporate lawyer. Reddit is entering a period where M&A, intellectual-property enforcement, platform access, and data-licensing negotiations could become strategically important.

They need someone capable of negotiating from a position of strength.

So when I look at Reddit, I see:

  • Massive global user distribution
  • An extremely difficult-to-replicate dataset
  • Rapid advertising monetization improvements
  • Very high gross margins
  • Experienced executives who have scaled similar businesses before
  • A technical founder/CEO who still thinks like a product builder
  • Data-licensing optionality
  • And potentially enormous room for capital allocation and M&A

That last point is where I think people may be dramatically underestimating what Reddit could eventually become.

Reddit does not necessarily have to remain one app.

Over the next several years, I could imagine Reddit building or acquiring an entire family of products: Discord-like communication, short-form video, payments, AI products, specialized communities, creator tools, search, and perhaps eventually its own foundation models or AI infrastructure.

Could Discord eventually become part of Reddit? I wouldn't rule it out.

Could Reddit launch its own TikTok-style product built around interests rather than identities? Absolutely.

Could Reddit build payments around communities and commerce? Again, completely plausible.

Could Reddit become a serious AI company? It already owns one of the ingredients AI companies desperately want: human-generated data at enormous scale.

And here's the important part:

Reddit may eventually be able to finance much of this expansion internally.

A highly scalable software platform with strong gross margins and growing free cash flow has enormous strategic flexibility. If management executes, Wall Street will also be more than willing to provide capital for sensible acquisitions.

That is how platform companies turn into empires.

My personal target remains roughly $550 sometime next year and around $900 by FY2028, assuming Reddit continues executing on advertising, margins, data licensing, and product expansion.

Obviously those numbers require execution and aren't guaranteed.

But my broader thesis doesn't depend on Reddit becoming perfect.

There is only one company in the entire U.S. stock market that can sustain ~60% revenue growth for eight consecutive quarters while reaching profitability so quickly (i.e., except chip hype NVDA).

The bar is much lower than people think.

Reddit already has the scarce assets: the users, the communities, the data, the brand, and the distribution.

Now it is finally building the machine that monetizes them.

I think we may be watching the early stages of another Meta-like wealth-creation story — except this time, the monetization playbook has already been written.

Long BULL REDDIT!!!!!!

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 3 days ago

TTD Is a Bad Investment: Everyone Has an Incentive to Cut Out the Middleman

I used to be a TTD investor myself, so this isn't coming from someone who has always hated the company. But at some point, **rationality has to come first**. Being emotionally attached to an investment thesis after the underlying business environment changes is how you lose money.

I genuinely don’t understand the bull case for The Trade Desk anymore.

TTD keeps talking about the **“open internet”** as if that phrase itself is a competitive moat. But what does TTD actually own?

No major consumer platform.
No search engine.
No social graph.
No meaningful proprietary content.
No massive first-party dataset.
No dominant publisher inventory.
No indispensable infrastructure.

Compare that with Google, Meta, Amazon, Reddit, Microsoft, Netflix, etc. These companies may support parts of the open internet, but they also possess **actual leverage**—users, data, inventory, distribution, identity, content, or infrastructure.

TTD mostly sits in the middle.

And that is exactly why I think its long-term business model is structurally flawed.

Look at the advertising pipeline from both directions:

**Advertisers want to cut TTD out** because every intermediary adds cost. If AI makes campaign planning, bidding, attribution, targeting and optimization increasingly automated, why should advertisers continue paying a substantial middleman fee?

**Publishers want to cut TTD out** because direct relationships with advertisers give them more control over their inventory, data and economics.

So both the buyer and seller have an incentive to reduce the importance of the broker sitting between them.

Advertising is already an extremely competitive market. This isn't some fragmented industry desperately requiring a broker to connect buyers and sellers. Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and other large platforms already have enormous advertiser relationships and increasingly sophisticated automated advertising technology.

AI makes this problem worse, not better.

A lot of what historically justified an independent DSP—optimization, audience selection, campaign management, measurement and bidding intelligence—looks increasingly like software that can be automated and commoditized.

TTD's response seems to be endlessly talking about the “open internet.”

But that's like complaining about the weather when you have no ability to control it.

A company can advocate for openness because it **chooses** openness despite possessing leverage. TTD needs the open internet because without it, there is very little underneath the business.

That is a very different situation.

I don't think TTD necessarily collapses overnight. It can continue generating revenue for years. But structurally, I see it as a **slowly dying middleman business** whose position becomes harder to defend as AI reduces transaction friction and both sides of the advertising market become more capable of dealing directly with each other.

I was willing to own TTD before. I'm not anymore, because **changing your mind when the facts change is investing; refusing to change your mind is just loyalty.**

The fundamental question for TTD bulls is simple:

**What does The Trade Desk control that the rest of the advertising ecosystem cannot eventually replace?**

I still haven't seen a convincing answer.

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 3 days ago

TTD Is a Bad Investment: Everyone Has an Incentive to Cut Out the Middleman

I used to be a TTD investor myself, so this isn't coming from someone who has always hated the company. But at some point, rationality has to come first. Being emotionally attached to an investment thesis after the underlying business environment changes is how you lose money.

I genuinely don’t understand the bull case for The Trade Desk anymore.

TTD keeps talking about the “open internet” as if that phrase itself is a competitive moat. But what does TTD actually own?

No major consumer platform.
No search engine.
No social graph.
No meaningful proprietary content.
No massive first-party dataset.
No dominant publisher inventory.
No indispensable infrastructure.

Compare that with Google, Meta, Amazon, Reddit, Microsoft, Netflix, etc. These companies may support parts of the open internet, but they also possess actual leverage—users, data, inventory, distribution, identity, content, or infrastructure.

TTD mostly sits in the middle.

And that is exactly why I think its long-term business model is structurally flawed.

Look at the advertising pipeline from both directions:

Advertisers want to cut TTD out because every intermediary adds cost. If AI makes campaign planning, bidding, attribution, targeting and optimization increasingly automated, why should advertisers continue paying a substantial middleman fee?

Publishers want to cut TTD out because direct relationships with advertisers give them more control over their inventory, data and economics.

So both the buyer and seller have an incentive to reduce the importance of the broker sitting between them.

Advertising is already an extremely competitive market. This isn't some fragmented industry desperately requiring a broker to connect buyers and sellers. Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and other large platforms already have enormous advertiser relationships and increasingly sophisticated automated advertising technology.

AI makes this problem worse, not better.

A lot of what historically justified an independent DSP—optimization, audience selection, campaign management, measurement and bidding intelligence—looks increasingly like software that can be automated and commoditized.

TTD's response seems to be endlessly talking about the “open internet.”

But that's like complaining about the weather when you have no ability to control it.

A company can advocate for openness because it chooses openness despite possessing leverage. TTD needs the open internet because without it, there is very little underneath the business.

That is a very different situation.

I don't think TTD necessarily collapses overnight. It can continue generating revenue for years. But structurally, I see it as a slowly dying middleman business whose position becomes harder to defend as AI reduces transaction friction and both sides of the advertising market become more capable of dealing directly with each other.

I was willing to own TTD before. I'm not anymore, because changing your mind when the facts change is investing; refusing to change your mind is just loyalty.

The fundamental question for TTD bulls is simple:

What does The Trade Desk control that the rest of the advertising ecosystem cannot eventually replace?

I still haven't seen a convincing answer.

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 3 days ago

The Bing–Reddit Deal That Suddenly Makes Sense in the AI Era

Watch this video.
Back in 2017, Bing and Reddit announced a collaboration aimed at improving Microsoft AI on Bing. At the time, AI was basically a nothingburger, but what they discussed in this video is shockingly similar to what LLMs are all about today. They simply started the partnership at the wrong time—now, the timing is right.

Reddit partnership with Bing in 2017

u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 4 days ago

Everyone Is Watching Google’s Reddit Data Licensing Deal — But Microsoft May Move First

Most people are focused on whether Google will renew or expand its Reddit data deal, but I think Microsoft/Bing may actually have a strong incentive to reach an agreement with Reddit before Google does.

The opportunity in search is simply too large for Microsoft to ignore. AI Overviews and AI search are changing user behavior, and this may be one of the rare moments where Bing has a realistic chance to take meaningful share from Google.

Fresh Reddit data could matter a lot here.

Reddit is one of the very few internet-scale sources of real-time human discussion, product experience, troubleshooting, opinions, niche knowledge and long-tail answers. The only obvious comparable source is X, but X has become extremely walled off, with Elon Musk taking aggressive technical and legal measures against scraping.

That makes Reddit data unusually scarce.

If Microsoft could secure privileged — or even exclusive — real-time Reddit access for Bing/Copilot before Google finishes its renewal, that could materially improve Bing’s search and AI answers. Microsoft may therefore be willing to make concessions on price, usage restrictions or redistribution terms that Google currently appears unwilling to make.

For Reddit, this would also be ideal. A serious Microsoft bid would create competition for its data instead of leaving Google as the obvious dominant search buyer.

So I wouldn’t only watch the Google–Reddit negotiations.

Microsoft, Bing, Copilot and potentially other search companies have a very real strategic and financial reason to want Reddit access too.

The bigger thesis may be that Reddit isn’t negotiating with one buyer. It owns a scarce data asset that multiple search/AI platforms may eventually have to compete for.

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 5 days ago

A Reddit–Anthropic Deal Could Be Closer Than It Looks

My guess is that Reddit may have already worked with Paul Cappuccio as an outside adviser before appointing him CLO (Chief Legal office). Ben Lee did a strong job through the IPO and built Reddit’s content-licensing framework, so replacing him with someone as heavyweight as Cappuccio feels deliberate.

I also would not be surprised if a Reddit–Anthropic deal comes together quite quickly. My impression from the recent hearing was that the two sides may already be moving toward negotiations. Anthropic’s posture didn’t feel like a party preparing to fight this all the way — it felt more like they were trying to limit their exposure and improve their negotiating position.

If Reddit had already brought Cappuccio in for strategic advice around AI/data disputes and then decided to hire him permanently, the timing would make a lot of sense.

This is just my guess, but I think an Anthropic settlement combined with a data-licensing agreement could be closer than the market expects, given the highly anticipated Anthropic in Sep/Oct.

This should easily send the stock to $250 and ATH.

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 6 days ago

opinion: Reddit version Short-format video

Lately, I have been browsing funny videos on Reddit. I find it very similar to TikTok (scrolling up and down), and sometimes it’s even more interesting and funny (although it can be addictive). Is Reddit preparing to launch its own TikTok-style feature within its existing Reddit app? The bottom navigation bar in the Reddit app only has three buttons now; maybe add short-video feature there (for easy access)?

reddit.com
u/Silent-Complaint4020 — 7 days ago