u/Simppu12

Title. I've gone through a handful of their improvised plays but I can't find the one I'm looking for. Tom or someone is playing a detective, I assume AJ was the villain and at one point tried to attract his attention by going "Detective. Detective. Deteeectiiiive!" like John Doe does in the movie Se7en.

Otsikko. Suomenlinnassa asuu muutama sata ihmistä ja siellä on koulu ja kauppakin, niin aloin miettiä millaista on asua siellä. Lautat ainakin kulkevat tiheästi ja kaupunki on lyhyen matkan päässä, eli täysin eristyksissä siellä ei olla. Mutta millaista siellä on yleisesti, etenkin jos on lapsi tai teini? Löytyykö tekemistä? Ärsyttävätkö turistit? Pystyykö sinne muuttamaan helposti? Miksi päätit asua siellä tai muuttaa pois?

Todennäköisyys löytää joku siellä asuva tai asunut on pieni, mutta kokeillaan kuitenkin.

> The real question is: where are the next elite-level players and what is the plan to start producing them again?

> Simply put, hardly any Scottish teenagers are playing first-team football. The Scottish Premiership is not platforming nearly enough teenage talents and the very best ones are being gobbled up by English academies.

> the rate of migration to England has increased from 35 teenagers between 2012 and 2020, to 66 between 2021 and 2026. Thirteen have gone in the first seven months of this year alone.

> “When you speak to the Croatian FA and even the Belgian FA, they were clear that, while they wanted performance schools, they also wanted their young talent to go over to England and be developed there.”

> Not reaching international level is one thing. For only four of those 72 players to make their next permanent move to a team in the top five leagues is another.

> In 2023, the European Club Association studied 1,223 players who left their home country before the age of 18 and found that 82 per cent had made no professional appearances before the age of 19.

> In 2024, the SFA’s Professional Game Body committee commissioned a report into the transition phase and found that fewer than four per cent of minutes were played by Scottish players 21 or younger. Only 32 per cent of minutes were played by Scottish players of any age.

> The Premiership’s 12-team format remains a limiting factor. ... However, Denmark is the same size and has two automatic relegation places, yet boasts more than double the homegrown under-20 minutes. Culture is clearly an issue.

> The diagnosis is clear. The best talent is not convinced there is a reliable pathway to the first-team and is bleeding south where, more often than not, they become lost in the richest league in the world.

An embarrassing question, but I'm struggling with Indian restaurants because I can't get the ratio of rice to curry right.

I'm used to going more 50/50 or even 65/35 with more rice than curry, but when I go to an Indian restaurant the ratio is basically the opposite: 35/65 in favour of curry. I'd describe my usual style as rice with some curry, but at restaurants it's curry with a bit of rice.

It's really delicious, but sometimes the curry ends up being a bit overpowering. So I was wondering if I'm eating curry wrong, or if I'm eating too much rice too fast, or if they give too little rice.

So basically, in an Indian curry, what's the right ratio of rice to curry and how do you eat it? Bonus points if you're South Asian and have first-hand knowledge.

I'll prephase this armchair "analysis" by saying that I don't really watch that much football and I don't really have much knowledge about the youth development aspects of football. But realistically I don't think most people commenting on it have.

I'm not convinced Germany's youth production actually is that weak. They won the U17 World Cup in 2023 (and got knocked out by Burkina Faso in the first knockout round last year), they've made four out of the last five "U21" Euro finals, and they still put out promising players like Brown, El Mala, Gruda, Tresoldi, Bischof, Woltemade, Atubolu, N. Collins in a variety of positions. Now, one flaw in this line of thinking might be equating U21 (which is really more like U23) successes to senior successes which obviously doesn't work like that as countries like Serbia have won some youth tournaments, but still. All of the players listed above are rated quite highly and many will, have, or are rumoured to transfer for big sums. Now, one swallow doesn't make a summer so maybe those players are developed despite the system, and in such a big country with a massive football culture you'll always find some talented players to break through.

Regarding youth work itself, I suppose some reforms are necessary but usually that's where the conversation ends - probably because the 80 million Bundestrainers don't actually have a clue how things work. I don't know how the German system compares to the English one or French one, but e.g. Philipp Lahm has argued for clearer pathways into the senior team and a more unified playing philosophy throughout clubs' youth formations and senior side - a bit like apparently Barcelona and Ajax have, though someone else should tell me how well e.g. Flick fits Cruyffian principles, so maybe that applies more to the national team along the lines of what e.g. England have apparently done with their England DNA thing - which honestly sounds a bit like buzzwords, but I suppose it's working well. However, it doesn't help that different "experts" seem to argue for different things. Lahm said there are too many generalists and not enough specialists created by the German system, a criticism echoed by many especially when it comes to strikers, but then Sami Khedira claimed a couple of years ago that Germany has recently had too many "artists" and not enough "team players" (and "leaders"). You could argue both are right, but then the argument becomes "change everything"... but to what? And are leading players created by national development centres or by the clubs themselves, as well as by the players' own personalities?

I've mentioned the clubs a couple of times, and I'd honestly argue they have managed to avoid their share of the blame. The clubs invest a lot in youth development and they're rarely truly broke, so ultimately player development is their task. And sometimes they succeed really well. But then when you have the oft-criticised lost generation of e.g. Werner and Brandt, is it their fault they're used in roles that don't suit them and their clubs are inconsistent regarding playing style? Werner worked well in a particular role at Rasenballsport, and then he went to Chelsea and he was never the same player again. Of course it's also very possible that many of these players are simply overrated as youngsters (Adeyemi is another modern example) and no matter what you do they won't become world class.

Finally, one more aspect is that Germany went out in relatively similar fashion in both 2022 and 2026: a lot of possession but few goals. In 2022 they at least created lots of chances while this time it didn't happen that much against Paraguay in particular, but seems like the side just struggles to score against a low block when it matters while also leaving its defence incredibly vulnerable to counters. Furthermore, both of Flick and Nagelsmann are/were highly rated when they took over, and Nagelsmann in particular had a very positive Euro tournament which both spectators and he himself seem to have forgotten about. Yes, things change in two years and Kroos is no longer there, but the regression is quite weird. What happens next if/when Klopp also doesn't perform well and gets called a fraud for using Kimmich in a certain way? Are all of the coaches poor or is there some underlying team dynamic that makes things more difficult?

Ultimately it's a complex and multi-fauceted issue. Which is not to say nothing should be done, but I don't know how often that "something" that's suggested actually means or does much.

> Vuosittain Suomessa korvataan runsaat 2000 potilasvahinkoa. Niistä noin viidesosa liittyy diagnoosin ja hoidon viiveeseen.

> Kliinisissä tutkimus- ja hoitotoimenpiteistä aiheutuvissa potilasvahingoissa diagnoosin ja hoidon viive on ollut korvausperusteena noin kahdessa kolmasosassa potilasvahingoista.

> Potilasvahingon korvaamisen edellytyksenä on, että diagnoosivirheen aiheuttaman viiveen seurauksena asianmukainen diagnoosi ja hoito on viivästynyt tai jäänyt toteutumatta, ja tästä on aiheutunut potilaalle määritettävissä olevaa haittaa.