u/SnooWoofers7603

Assalamu alaikum,

I was thinking that our future Caliphate to be a decentralized federal authority where provinces can have a limited autonomy and tribes to have limited autonomy. But to exclude Iran from Caliphate, because she’s not a Sunni state and includes only Sunni states such as Turkey and those in Africa and Levant including Palestine, and also to include Kurdistan and East Turkistan/also known as Xinjiang(unfortunately).

Only Sunni regions can be included as mentioned above. Can Nigeria also be included since it’s a majority Sunni?

The rest who are not, such as USA; Canada, Russia, China, Iran should not be included, because here it is a union.

More than a million Muslims in East Turkestan are in internment camps. We do not know what condition they are in. Perhaps there are even gas chambers inside these camps? WE DO NOT KNOW!

Under the guise of a "becoming a family" project, Chinese men are being placed in the homes of people who have been taken to these internment camps.

People are being sent to China's interior regions as slave laborers.

The Chinese government does not allow independent observers to enter the region or conduct free investigations. If everything were truly perfect—as they claim—they would not be so afraid.

O MUSLIMS! OUR GOVERNMENTS MAY BE ABANDONING YOUR BRETHREN FOR THE SAKE OF ECONOMIC TIES WITH CHINA! BUT DO NOT YOU ABANDON THEM! THE PEOPLE OF EAST TURKESTAN ARE JUST AS MUCH YOUR BRETHREN AS THE PEOPLE OF GAZA! THEY TOO ARE MUSLIMS! THEY TOO ARE HUMAN BEINGS! THEY TOO ARE IN CAPTIVITY!

Assalamu alaikum,

In-Sha’Allah I’ll start reciting this Du’ā that I may die as a true Muslim. But since I’m not born after Sunrise from West, I want to prepare myself(because nobody knows when will that happen, so we can assume) in case I may live up to the moment when Allah will blow a wind To take the lives of the true Muslims and Leave the disbelievers before the horn is sounded. I’m applying the “always be a step ahead” rule, so that I may not regret later.

For Du’ā to be answered, the du'a has to be accompanied with action. For example: if I make du’a to have a house, I’ll have to take the means which leads to that, if I want to have my du’a being answered. At-least, that’s according to my understanding of how du’a works, now, I could be mistaken.

The “only Allah can judge” and “it’s their life” excuse is not the way of the Prophet ﷺ and his Companions رضي** الله **عنهم.
Yes, Allah alone judges people’s hearts and their final fate.
But using that statement to defend open disobedience is ignorance.
If Allah made something haram, we say it is haram.
If Allah commanded something, we say it is obligatory.
We do not water down Allah’s rulings because someone gets offended.
Allah says:
“Let there be among you a group calling to what is good, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong.” (3:104)
And Allah condemned those who:
“did not forbid one another from the wrongdoing they committed.” (5:79)
The Prophet ﷺ said:
“Whoever among you sees an evil, let him change it…”
The Sahabah did not understand Islam as “it’s their life, leave them alone.”
Abu Bakr رضي الله عنه explicitly warned against using “Take care of yourselves” as an excuse to abandon commanding good and forbidding evil.
So stop confusing judging a deed with judging the unseen.
Saying “this is haram” is not claiming to be Allah.
Saying “this person is definitely a hypocrite and will definitely enter Hell” is a completely different matter.
We judge what is apparent according to the Qur’an and Sunnah.
We leave hearts and final judgment to Allah.
And “it’s their life” is not an argument in Islam.
It is Allah’s command that matters, not what a person personally wants to do with their life.
If someone openly commits a sin, you don't change Allah’s ruling to make them comfortable.
The religion is not based on “who am I to judge?”
It is based on:
“What did Allah and His Messenger ﷺ command?”
That is the difference between following the revelation and following people’s desires.

Assalamu alaikum,

It was the first time ever when I fell off from the electric scooter after trying to give priority to the pedestrian who was in front of me.

When my mom saw that I was wounded, she forbade me from riding the electric scooters and so I tried to explain her why it is beneficial but she thinks that I’m being silly. But her prohibition will make me miss the scooter.

I was proposing for sneaking behind her back so to prove her the contrary that I may earn her trust and increase my credibility that this was only one time and I’d be more precautious when riding. I used to be precautious before that happened; slowing down the speed, but this situation was unique and from that situation I learnt to pay attention on where I step.

Would Allah help me out to increase my credibility and earn her trust if this is the purpose for sneaking behind her back just so she can see how fallacious her views were and grant me permission to ride after having disapproved her belief?

With the electric scooter I can travel to anywhere in short time around the city, because it means that I’ll not have to wait for bus to come when I’m late. It also spares me from waiting the drivers, because I can ride aside them.

You think by sending the settlements will defend Israel, but yet when some of them get hurt then you cry about “terrorism” and also punish the person. It’s your mistake for establishing colonies, so you shouldn’t complain about terrorism or about mountain hikers being wounded. It’s all your fault. This is not Zionism, this is circus.

I got an alternative so you stop whining. Why not replace them with IDF outposts since that’s their job and not civilian’s job to handle national threats? What do you think the acronym for* IDF means? And civilians are not part of military, that’ll be meddling in military operations to act like heroes and have public attention.

Do you think this would be right?

I would want for the next update that Reddit to add the feature for hiding all comments in the profile so that the victims of the trolls may defend themselves from being intimidated.

All people in the platform are upset with the feature being removed, so therefore I’m asking that the feature for quoting to be restored.

You seem to always associate the "destruction of Israel" with genocide, which is not true. If we apply this logic, we can say that Jews during Roman Empire got wiped out when Hadrian crushed the revolts. This is just hypocrisy to call it in present day "genocide" while ignoring how this has happened during Hadrian's time. Why was Hadrian not genocide but in present day it is?

If let's say in an alternative reality: people would have fought IDF to the point of weakening them, recapture the cities and make Knesset leaders for surrender while having offered shelter to Jewish civilians and less casualties, would that be considered "genocide"?

You may not agree with this definition, because it's how you perceived ever since Oct7, but don't you ever think there could be people who have different interpretations for the destruction of Israel who happen to not follow how it was incurred in Oct7(with firing rockets and other stuff) and choose to be independent thinkers? You cannot accuse the person of supporting genocide if you failed to question his methodology which differs from others. That's just being very hasty in judgement.

A lot of countries got dismantled. Were Greek people massacred when Ottoman Empire dismantled Byzantine or they avoid them? Did Saud family not integrated people of Najd as Saudi citizens or they massacred them when trying to dismantle Emirate of Jabal Shammar?

Assalamu alaikum,

I’ve been hearing all the time how rulers worldwide think this is rebellion.

I don’t think there is anything in Quran and Sunnah that says it is Khuruj, if there is, can you find me and also scholarly consensus?

I only want Western Arabia and Western Najd where I can establish a kingdom. The rest, Saudi Arabia can keep it. I’m not asking for all of Saudi Arabia, but a small portion.

Assalamu alaikum,

In Islam, it is haram to get into a gathering of free mixed genders. And in the place where I live, all schools are free mixed genders.

I always wanted to get assigned to Airspace Engineering collage, but unfortunately it is free mixed gender. What I can do is to avoid sitting with girls and sit with same gender and avoid unnecessary talking with opposite genders. I mean, me sitting in a desk with same gender.

I want to prepare myself to work at NASA as an engineer.

Since it is opened genders, I would choose to sit with same gender in the desk or be alone.

I’m preparing for the second high-school exam session.

I’m a boy by the way, and for protecting my Islamic commitment I would avoid interaction with opposite genders in the classroom, since I have options with whom I can sit in the desk, if it is in a mixed gender university, and I’ll try to avoid seclusions and unnecessary talking with opposite.

Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuh,

I have recalled a verse where it says that sin will be absent in Paradise, and since monarchies and for private individual to submit for territorial cession is halal then in there I can submit formal request that Allah defines for me borders and airspace, and play as an emperor all day long. Because that is halal. And I can even have a river of cold Pepsi so to enjoy my favorite drink, because Pepsi is also a halal drink and I drink it only every weekend as agreed in contract with my mother.

I mean, in there only halal there can be and sin will be absent. So, based on this I can reflect and stop asking left and right about this matter.

I’m only judging based on halal and haram, and the idea that sin will be absent in Paradise.

Assalamu alaikum,

I never understood how it is shirk this interaction. Just because you fear of their harm is shirk?! Also as humans, we fear one another, like for example: I fear of a person would repeat his trolling or bullying or trying to commit genocide. Is this shirk? Am I doing shirk if I fear of a terrorist trying to kill me?

Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuh,

The Hadith says about three things which will remain with you in grave.

I have a WordPress account with sites dedicating to spread beneficial earthly and Islamic knowledge, for example having a site for Internet Museum where people can benefit when looking for something like biography of Sam Shamoun or origin of wikiislam so people can see how hypocritical and fake is this site and who runs it. And also have an Islamic site where I share Salaf teachings.

Double sources means double rewards.

Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuh,

There have been cases in Egypt where some churches are destroyed and in Gaza Strip where Israel bombed churches and mosques.

So since it is not permissible to assist or rebuild, is it at-least permissible to let the non-Muslims build their own temples instead of defending on Muslim authorities?