I have no doubt there is an easy to do this that I don't have a clue about. I want to remove the highlighted area from the circle. I can always back up and do something different if that would be better.
I've been using the Koda Pro 2 for about 2 months now. I like pretty much everything about the oven except for the dual burner (both sides). Having a burner on both sides means that there is little to no ability to get parts of the pizza away from the upper heat as it can only be turned 90 degrees. It also makes it difficult to cook the bottom of the pizza as turning down the heat lowers the amount of heat kept on the stone. If there was a burner on one side, you could move the pizza further away from the heat and leave the flamed turned up higher. As I mentioned, I like that it has 2 burners but I think a _huge_ design flaw is not being able to turn one off while cooking. Even a lever to kill one side would have been good.
Yes Google, I get it... you want me to pay for the 1 to 3GB upgrade. I don't need emails 4 times a week! Sheezzz.
(I think this is my 3rd time opting out)
If I were to pay the monthly fee, would I retain my saved projects? That is, if I create some projects in July under a monthly license, I did not pay in August, would I still have access to those projects if I again paid a monthly fee in September?
Right now I have a yearly plan but in the past 3 months I've only used it twice. So I think I'd be better off only paying the monthly fee when I use it. However, I'd still want to be able to access old projects. I'm guessing if I did not pay for a certain month that my plan would simply turn into the free one and then revert back once I paid for a month?
Just got done with the CA test for an adjusters license. Need to take the NY one next. Someone told me it was just like the CA test but questions are not as tricky. Anyone take both or jus the NY test? What did you think of it?
While this is a claim... it's more of an adjuster question...
As an adjuster, I get it... but can someone tell me if this is typical and perhaps now that I'm involved in the actual claim, I'm being unrealistic.
Hydroplaned and slammed into a guardrail. Filed claim on Sunday, so let's call that Monday. Around Tuesday I get a message that they have determined I was at fault. No other info. So Thursday I call and they tell me since it's a "motorcycle" that they need to send it to a vendor (Snapsheet). Now, if someone looked at it to determine one vehicle hydroplaning and hitting a guardrail made it an "at fault" accident, seems like they could have (should have?) just sent it to the outside vender at that time. I do get an automated text message from the vender on Thursday to text back photos. I sent them within a few minutes. I'm pretty sure it was mentioned in some way that I should hear something in 24-48 hours. If so, I think that is completely reasonable. I'm wondering if someone can tell me if this usually happens or what a realistic timeframe might be.
I'll just mention that I'm asking as the vehicle is classified as a motorcycle but it's really not, it's more of an unusual "car". There are only about 7000 of them made. So I know this will be a little different and won't fit into the simple box of, it's a motorcycle. It will probably need some conversation. I just don't want to sit around for another week just to have someone tell me, it needs to be sent to someone else.
Arches, as well as several other NP have a problem with the time it takes to enter the park. About a year ago Arches went to a timed entry system. You paid $2.00 and got a window of 2 hours that you could enter the park. No timed entry was needed before the gate was manned or after 4pm. Personally, I think this worked very well, however, I also knew that they released an additional 70 spots at 5pm MT the day before. So if you did not have a timed entry, you could just log on around 5pm and you were a shoe in to get one.
Now, Arches got rid of timed entry this year. As I understand it, visitation went down so they decided 1) it must be because of timed entry and 2) something therefore needed to be changed. Personally, I question if a reduction in visitors is really a reason to get ride of people having to wait an hour+ just to get in.
Arches is now going to try shuttle busses. They have not yet determined how it will work. I'm not sure how/why they would even start that process before they had a finalized plan but that is what they say. I see 2 possibilities; they only load up people on a bus who can enter the park and then drive them into the park and also run shuttles to all the trailheads or just run the shuttles within the park. I suspect that they will do it as Zions has done it and use shuttles to run people into the park and then to most of the trailheads.
What do people think about this system? Any ideas on a better system?
Personally I completely respect the people that are trying to make a better system. Now, the NPS makes a _TON_ of money (and only get to keep a very small percentage of it) but I question if cramming more and more people into some of the parks all at once is a good solution.
Does anyone know if Zion is still offering the Zion Express Program ($5, watch 3 videos and you can print your permits)? I've had one for awhile now but just now can't print up my permit. It's worked before so I think perhaps my "membership" might have expired. If possible I'd like to find out before I go to the visitors center if they still offer this as then I can plan on getting there earlier. Thanks!
Have a performance tune from BNR. Before and after a new BNR wastegate actuator I have a situation where I will accelerate hard enough for the transmission to downshift. Then, about 2-3 seconds after that it will sound/feel like a vacuum closes and I get a big power boost.
Prior to the BNR wastegate actuator I asked BNR what they thought this could be. They said it sounded like the old wastegate actuator, hence the upgrade. But the same thing is happening.
What I'm thinking is that the blow off valve is allowing boost to escape most of the time and then it closes at the point of the burst of power. That is what it sounds like as well. However, that does not make any sense to me as why would the blow off value close when there is more boost.
Any ideas?
