A slow burn so slow the first book has no HFN/HEA—is that a dealbreaker?
Hola everyone,
I'm querying an upmarket/book club novel with a strong romantic thread, and I'm trying to figure out where it fits from a romance-reader perspective.
The novel follows Leo, a 25-year-old furniture restorer from Kansas City who moves to Los Angeles looking for love. It's loosely structured around the Twelve Labors of Hercules: each month Leo faces a different "monster" through a new relationship, friendship, or emotional challenge while slowly developing a deep connection with Andrés, the Costa Rican produce vendor at his local farmers market.
The romance between Leo and Andrés is intentionally a very slow burn. Across the book they become increasingly important to one another, but Leo is still emotionally trapped by his ex, Taylor, and keeps repeating unhealthy relationship patterns.
By the end, Leo is faced with three choices:
- return to his toxic ex,
- begin something with Andrés,
- or choose himself and his family.
He chooses the third.
So Book 1 does not end with a HFN or HEA. Leo and Andrés don't become a couple. Instead, the ending leaves the possibility of a future between them, but only after Leo has done the emotional work he needs to do. It's hopeful, but intentionally unresolved.
Several beta readers have loved this ending because it feels earned, but it made me wonder how romance readers—and romance writers—would view it.
My questions are:
- Would you still consider this a romance, or would you shelve it as upmarket fiction with a romantic subplot?
- If you picked this up expecting a slow burn, would the lack of a HFN/HEA in Book 1 feel satisfying or disappointing?
- Have you seen successful series where the central romance doesn't resolve until a later book?
I'd love to hear your thoughts, especially if you've written or read romance that plays with these expectations.