u/Unique_Experience492

First, how come few gems (at least from what we know) ever questioned Rose? First off, she seemed to be abnormally strong. Though I guess you could brush it off that she came out built different like Jasper. Second, she had healing powers.

No other gem (Again, which we know of) has healing powers besides the diamonds. And of course, the classic "they're never in the same place at the same time" Rose and Pink diamond, I'm assuming have never been seen apart. Unless they had planned for this and pearl shapeshifted while Rose made an appearance as Pink.

​

Second, why wasn't Garnet as visibly disturbed when Lapis and Jasper fused as opposed to the gem shards? I know she develops emotionally as the story moves forward, but Lapis and Jasper fusing is nearly equally as horrible.

Jasper had clearly coerced Lapis into fusing and it was later shown that the relationship was mutually abusive, and her reaction was kinda just "Meh. That don't seem right."

While I was defending Megumi in YouTube comments, I made the logical assumption that EOS Megumi wouldn't have Makora tamed because one, Makora was destroyed, and two, Him and Sukuna don't share the exact same shikigami.

This made made think for a while, though, and there's evidence that both suggest they do and that they don't.

A. They don't.

I personally think there's a decent amount of evidence to suggest that they don't.

First off, the fundamental difference between Sukuna and Yuji's shrine. It's the same overall concept and recognized as the same technique, but still completely different in basically everything else. We don't know if this is the same case vice versa, but I feel like it just makes sense so let's say, hypothetically, it does.

Not only this, but there's obviously a visual difference of Sukuna's Shikigami in comparison to Megumi. I don't know if this actually means something, of if it's just an artistic choice for the sake of viewers / differentiation, etc.

Third, basically every time Sukuna is present after switching with his vessel, his presence is noticed, identified, and obvious. This could suggest that the ten shadows possibly recognized him as a different person, but this might be a bit of a reach so it's fair game if you say this doesn't really matter.

B. They do.

I don't have a lot of evidence to really suggest they do, but I have one strong enough to counter my other points.

Near the beginning of the story, Megumi fought Sukuna. And Sukuna destroyed Orochi. Fast forward, and he's using Orochi in Nue totality and eventually Agito, which implies and suggests that Orochi is still dead, which can further suggest, assuming Sukuna didn't murder Orochi again after he got the shikigami because that doesn't make sense to me, that they DO share the same technique and set of shikigami

Second point, it'd just be equally logical to assume so.

Is there actually an explanation for this? Is this ever addressed or acknowledged, or is this just left behind like a lot of other concepts in JJK?

I watched this show a while back, but I forgot basically everything about it. I'm rewatching it now, but I noticed something about firebenders that makes them different from other benders.

When other benders bend, specifically earth and waterbenders, they can move whatever they're bending around freely with their mind and aren't restricted to simply use it as a projectile... as opposed to firebending.

We RARELY see firebending being manipulated by firebenders the way other benders manipulate their elements, and it's usually just shown being used to make fireballs, large blasts of fire, you get the idea. I thought of a few solutions to this idea, but I want someone to confirm anyways.

1. It requires a certain mastery of firebending and because of the war, most people that would have to learn it don't quite get such generous time to.

2. They simply have a "If ain't not broke, don't fix it." mindset and just don't bother to innovate or improve

We've seen firebenders like Avatar Roku, Iroh (I think) And someone else (I forgot his name) do it, so we know that is IS possible, which led me to conclusion 1.