u/Vegetable_Focus_5061

BrooksGames is... interesting, but I don't think it's likely in the slightest.

I'm gonna say it again: I do not like GoldenDuo, as I feel it only complicates things, but I feel it's still most likely the case, as much as I wish it was JUST the Bite Victim in Golden Freddy.

I don't think it's as bad as people say it is.

The only part I agree is actually kinda mid is the Candy Factory (The Supervisor is NOT scary, bro), but everything else is fine; I think the problem people have with it is that it's different, but I don't think difference makes it bad. I mean, the story is about completely different people from the protagonists of the other games, and it's made by a different studio, so it makes sense that a lot of stuff would be different, right?

I do agree that it's not as good as Little Nightmares 1 and 2, but I don't think it's bad.

I believe I know what Six's fate was MEANT to be, but whether or not that fate came to be is left up in the air.

https://preview.redd.it/sx1wuz4jvsmh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=0e0dea1c8ded4ccd0a53bdc58a5dc6c8cadded04

I think it's quite cool, actually. The idea of William making an animatronic that looked like it was designed for security but was actually meant to keep kids inside so he could kill them is dope.

That being said, the only good pieces of evidence are the FNaF 2 movie and the fact that the Puppet looks similar to the Crying Child, which could mean William designed the Puppet after him.

Since I now believe CharlieFirst, I don't think this is the case, but I still think it's dope.

I've always believed there was a paradox in Little Nightmares 2, like most other fans, so I'm genuinely curious. Is it just because it's easier to understand?

I find it interesting how it's not clear who William's favorite is. For example, in the movies, William straight up tells Vanessa, who I believe is meant to be the movie's version of Elizabeth, that she is his favorite, but then in the novel trilogy, when Elizabeth, as Baby, asks William if she's enough, William straight up says no.

I know a lot of FNaF fans believe FNAF World is canon, so I'm expecting to see a lot of people saying yes, but I'm curious to know what people who DON'T think FNAF World is canon think.

I'd say GoldenDuo; It doesn't have any good evidence other than GoldenCassidy evidence and GoldenVictim evidence.

So I saw all the posts about FNaF 1 possibly taking place in 1989 because of the image on Twitter.

https://preview.redd.it/ei4atbvj4tkh1.png?width=589&format=png&auto=webp&s=8a6444c531b5285af1b01122579449f1de1d3139

However, in The Week Before, on page 224, Ralph makes a reference to The Godfather Part III: "I was out. But they pulled me back in.l" And since The Godfather Part III came out in December of 1990, and since FNaF 1 takes place in November, that makes it take place in 1991 at minimum.

So in Little Nightmares 1, there are a bunch of portraits of a girl; two of them I noted as interesting, being the one where the girl is wearing a yellow coat, and the one where she's standing next to the Lady.

https://preview.redd.it/faz18m01wfkh1.png?width=368&format=png&auto=webp&s=6c846e7960244a47e03f4e2283c747b95df0ad34

Then, in Little Nightmares 2 (I think it was Little Nightmares 2), she's included among the bunch of portraits featuring Six.

https://preview.redd.it/wxx6yzv7wfkh1.png?width=512&format=png&auto=webp&s=927a022d7e132622bc8ab1ee494985f130bbe9c2

I just can't help but feel as if she is connected to Six and the Lady. So who is she? I saw someone claim her portraits are called "SixPaintings" or something in the files, but I have no way of checking the files, and I only have Little Nightmares 1, so I don't think I'm able to verify that claim for myself.

Is this supposed to be Six herself, or is this supposed to be someone Six knew?

https://preview.redd.it/wspcut0k70kh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=1ba6e65da373d9c6a796ebeedb5d5d544fe8b62f

It's called WillDebase, which is the theory that William cared about his kids before, but over time, he shed all his care for them, and now doesn't care about them.

What do y'all think of this theory?

I

https://preview.redd.it/e33v5m31xljh1.png?width=487&format=png&auto=webp&s=139e2bb000da81f4d41a14f5da058439e53b1cf0

I think it's dope. Probably not true, but still dope.

Those with frontal lobe damage tend to have mood swings, so why not say that BV can be a chill guy for a minute, then suddenly be very angry?

We can all agree that William is a bad person; He's an asshole, a corrupt businessman, and a manipulative father. But not all bad people have the capacity to actually murder someone.

On the FNaF theories wiki, one of the problems listed for CassidyReciever is how Cassidy has long hair in the novels. The response to this problem was that long hair can be curly, as Cassidy is implied to have curly hair, but then the response to that response says the book explicitly states she had long, straight black hair.

Now, I don't have the book for myself to verify that claim, and that's why I'm asking. Is the wiki wrong, or is it actually stated somewhere?

Cause I feel it's logical to say Redbear in UCN is the same Redbear as the one in FNAF World. And Redbear in FNAF World is meant to be the player of FNAF World, who I'm pretty sure is actually meant to be an entity created by Glitchbear, as he says, "You were created for one thing."

https://preview.redd.it/itx6gh9kr7gh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e56ab89b00f4943d992938112ef4de29188ccf2f

Personally, when I played the Little Nightmares DLC, I called him Gordon, cause he just looks like a Gordon to me.

Personally, I draw the line right before UCN. Scott made FFPS to tie up loose ends, not make more, and from what I can tell, he seemed to be planning the Steel Wool era by the time of UCN, so it's possible to leave some plot threads in UCN.

Edit: I'm referring to when Scott could've planned something that was revealed to us in the Steel Wool era.