Why the eFoil Industry Is Gatekept, And Why We’re Calling It Out

Why the eFoil Industry Is Gatekept, And Why We’re Calling It Out

When we first entered the eFoil market in 2021, our goal was simple: bring modern direct-to-consumer technology, dynamic engineering, and real value to riders worldwide. But we quickly saw the reality of how gatekept and controlled this legacy industry actually is.

Early on, Levi Morris at Bay Foils (Alameda, CA) posted an independent, glowing review comparing XFoil to existing options. Shortly after, Fliteboard corporate threatened and verified in writing to strip Bay Foils of their dealer status unless they took the video down. You can read the documented account here on our community post: https://www.reddit.com/r/eFoil_Future/s/nexhx7yONm

That was our first concrete look at the hidden tactics used to suppress independent feedback and protect inflated dealer markups. As we’ve continued to innovate, release superior technologies, and cut out the middleman, we’ve repeatedly encountered these unethical tactics from dealer threats to brand-affiliated moderators gatekeeping online discussions.

Rather than staying quiet, we took action. We ran global ad campaigns reaching millions of people primarily in densely watersport communities to expose how legacy dealer markups and cartel-style behavior really work behind closed doors. You can read the breakdown that millions of prospective riders saw here:https://xfoil.com/blogs/news/why-other-efoils-cost-15-000-and-why-ours-doesnt

If exposing these practices impacts our reputation or sales among legacy insiders, so be it.

For over two decades across our team's history, our core mission has never changed: build innovative, high-performance products and make them accessible at an affordable price.

Threatening dealers and suppressing independent reviews doesn't signal market dominance, it signals a massive lack of confidence in their own product. Rather than hiding behind dealer threats and online trolling, we recommend that legacy brands focus on modernizing and innovating their own hardware.

To the legacy eFoil brands: our door is always open. We welcome any legacy eFoil brand to engage constructively. Welcome you to Hawaii for a friendly get-together on the water. Let’s bring real performance to the forefront, grow the sport transparently in a positive light, and let riders decide for themselves.

Cheers,

Team XFoil

u/XFoil_Official — 7 days ago

XFoil reinvented the EFoil electric hydrofoil replacing fixed wings with dynamic wings and then they called us a scam.

When we introduced this to the legacy efoil electric watercraft industry the gatekeepers and old guards went nuts and banned this video trying to protect their inflated margins of their outdated tech. Does it look like a scam to you or does it actually look like innovation? This is real footage shot in a smart phone. Thoughts?

u/XFoil_Official — 8 days ago

35 for 35. Successfully Funded $14M Raisled, Over 54,000 Backers. Latest XFoil Apex, Escape, Alpha 1, Alpha 2

Want to introduce ourselves to the community. We are PLX Devices also operate as XFoil, Legion Solar. Since 2012 we have launched 35 total campaigns all 100% funded within the first 4 hours and most funded in the first hour. All fulfilled with the most recent in active fulfillment. Happy to answer any questions you may have about crowdfunding.

From creators to backers, what's your most frustrating thing you've encountered about crowdfunding?

reddit.com
u/XFoil_Official — 8 days ago

35 for 35. Successfully Funded $14M Raisled, Over 54,000 Backers. Latest XFoil Apex, Escape, Alpha 1, Alpha 2

Want to introduce ourselves to the community. We are PLX Devices also operate as XFoil, Legion Solar. Since 2012 we have launched 35 total campaigns all 100% funded within the first 4 hours and most funded in the first hour. All fulfilled with the most recent in active fulfillment. We have extensive experience with fulfillment challenges, competitor scam narratives, backer community management, etc. Happy to answer any questions you may have about crowdfunding.

From creators to backers, what's your most frustrating thing you've encountered about crowdfunding?

reddit.com
u/XFoil_Official — 8 days ago

Noise Problem? EFoil Geared Propulsion vs. Direction Drive Propulsion.

Wanted to get the community feedback on this noise issue. Recently geared efoils have been a cause of complaint in Hawaii sparking debates and talks of bans in some communities. Swimmers report high pitched sounds they can hear for miles. They say it threatens wild life, etc. It made some TV news headlines in the past.

Here's footage of from a go pro 360 (unedited) from our efoil group ride. On the left a geared planetary gear system (Fliteboard) and on the right a direct drive system (XFoil).

Do you think this noise is an issue or it's moot? Love to hear feedback.

u/XFoil_Official — 8 days ago
▲ 590 r/foiling+1 crossposts

After 1,000+ ocean test failures for XFoil Apex, we finally got our dynamic wing electric efoil hydrofoil to stabilize in Hawaiian chop

u/XFoil_Official — 9 days ago

After 5 years of R&D in Fremont & Hawaii, our dynamic-wing eFoil (Apex Gen 4) just hit the top 1% on Kickstarter. Here is the engineering story of how we built it.

Building a marine watercraft that operates at the volatile boundary layer between saltwater, extreme vibration, and air is a fast-track to questioning your sanity.

Five years ago, we set out in Fremont, California to solve the biggest flaw with legacy e-foils: static wings.

On traditional boards, stability relies 100% on the rider's constant, manual weight distribution to compensate for swell, chop, and speed variations. If you hit ocean chop at 25+ mph, static control loops fail to handle non-linear fluid dynamics, leading to violent pitch oscillations ("porpoising"), sudden cavitation, and instant wipeouts.

Designed in Fremont, California and ocean-tested in Hawaiian chop, we combined Silicon Valley edge-engineering with real-world ocean trials to build the XFOIL Apex and Escape Gen 4.

The Technical Milestones (And What It Took to Rank Top 1%):

  • Adaptive Active Dynamic Wing System (AWS): Instead of fixed wings, we deployed active control surfaces driven by closed-loop. Sub-15ms edge inference adjusts the wing's angle-of-attack (AoA) in real time to damp ocean chop, boosting hydrodynamic efficiency by 25% and adding up to 30 minutes of extra flight time.
  • Thrust-Driven Predictive Stabilization: The onboard system continuously makes micro-adjustments beneath the waterline to automatically neutralize throttle-induced pitching during sudden acceleration or deceleration.
  • Integrated Direct-Drive & Underwater ESC: We eliminated leak-prone cooling pumps and internal water hoses entirely by miniaturizing our 75V/100A continuous ESC by 75% and embedding it directly inside the submerged motor housing for direct marine-immersed cooling.
  • High-Voltage Headroom (67.2V / 16S): Our 16S architecture delivers 14% higher voltage than industry standards, keeping current low and preventing thermal throttling during heavy carving.

After half a decade of prototyping, field testing, and stripping out failure points, launching on Kickstarter and hitting the top 1 percentile of campaigns globally has been an incredible validation for our engineering team.

Happy to answer any questions about our hardware architecture, embedded edge constraints, or marine waterproofing lessons from the field!

reddit.com
u/XFoil_Official — 9 days ago
▲ 396 r/foiling+3 crossposts

Implementing On-Edge Dynamic Flight Stabilization in E-Foils: Using Closed-Loop Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Wing Control

1. The Core Engineering Challenge

Electric hydrofoils operate at the highly volatile boundary layer between ocean water and air. Legacy e-foils rely on static, fixed-wing geometries, forcing the rider to constantly absorb pitch instability, rough chop, and throttle-induced pitching manually.

To automate pitch, roll, and yaw stability at speeds exceeding 25–30+ mph, hardcoded static PID loops fail because fluid dynamics in turbulent ocean conditions are non-linear.

2. The Solution: XFOIL Adaptive Dynamic Wings (AWS) & Active Thrust Stabilization

Across the XFOIL Apex (100L all-arounder with dual Surface/Fly modes) and Escape (80L agile composite platform)—validated and backed through our Kickstarter and Indiegogo communities—we replaced passive wings with our Adaptive Active Dynamic Wing System (AWS) and Active Thrust Driven Stabilization.

Instead of static control loops, the XFOIL platform uses a continuous closed-loop control system trained via Reinforcement Learning (RL):

  • High-Frequency Sensor Fusion: An array of 6-DOF IMUs, hall-effect magnetic throttle sensors from the 191g Nano Remote, and pressure transducers feed telemetry into the onboard processor at 200Hz+.
  • Real-Time Subsurface Adjustments: The controller makes intelligent, predictive adjustments beneath the waterline to continuously neutralize pitch variations caused by rapid acceleration/deceleration, wave crest passage, and ocean chop.
  • Rider-Adaptive Optimization (E-Foil For Everyone): The algorithm differentiates human rider movements (center-of-mass shifts, banking into turns) from environmental turbulence. It dynamically adjusts the wing's angle-of-attack (AoA), delivering up to a 25% increase in hydrodynamic efficiency—yielding up to 30 minutes longer session times and over 7 miles of additional range on our 1,894Wh long-range battery.

3. Edge Hardware & Thermal Architecture Constraints

Executing low-latency control loops in a marine-sealed environment introduced strict hardware constraints:

  • Miniaturized Underwater ESC: We miniaturized the motor controller by 75% and integrated the 75V, 100A continuous (150A peak) ESC directly inside the underwater motor housing. This creates a direct water-immersed solid-state cooling system—eliminating internal cooling hoses, heat sinks, and water pumps entirely.
  • Low-Latency Inference (<15ms): Actuation latency is capped under 15ms to prevent phase lag and high-speed porpoising.
  • 16S / 67.2V Voltage Headroom: Operating on a 67.2V peak architecture (14% higher than industry standard) keeps system current low, drastically reducing thermal throttling during heavy dynamic wing actuations.

4. Results & Field Validation

During Hawaii field trials with early production units shipped to our Kickstarter and Indiegogo backers, field testing demonstrated:

  • Complete neutralization of throttle-induced pitching during sudden speed changes.
  • Significant reduction in the learning curve for beginner riders on the Apex platform.
  • Extended flight times and lower total energy draw from the direct-drive brushless motor due to dynamic AoA drag reduction.

Discussion Points for the AI / Robotics Community:

  1. Model Drift vs. Hydrodynamic Noise: How do you best handle real-time edge adaptation when localized cavitation or air-venting introduces unpredictable sensor noise during high-speed carving?
  2. Deterministic Safety Boundaries: In safety-critical embedded systems, what hybrid architectures (e.g., neural networks wrapped inside deterministic safety boundaries like board-angle auto shutdown or instant kill-switches) do you favor to prevent control flap lockups?
u/PrestigiousTomato8 — 10 days ago

Funding the Future of eFoiling: How Dynamic Wings Hit 100% Goal in 30 Minutes ⚡🚀

What’s up r/foiling!

We just wrapped an unreal Demo Day out at Kaneohe Yacht Club in Hawaii, putting over 50 riders on the water, and the feedback confirmed what we’ve been working toward for 5 years: the era of rigid, fixed-wing eFoils is coming to an end.

Dynamic Wings vs. Legacy Fixed Wings Active thrust stabilization that makes fixed-wing boards feel like ancient tech. Advanced riders get sharper carves, beginners get instant stability, and traditional eFoil makers are scrambling to catch up.

For years, the eFoil industry kept churning out the same static hardware forcing riders to fight ocean chop manually on rigid, immobile wings. We engineered active, thrust-driven control surfaces right into our lineup, allowing the wing platform to work with the water dynamic rather than against it.

We had 2025 Hawaii E-Foil Extravaganza Race Champ Paul McDonald come out to pick up his new Escape board and put our Dynamic Wings through their paces in open-bay chop. His verdict after stepping off:

>

The Specs Driving the Shift:

  • Dynamic Wings: Active stabilization that reacts to your throttle and roll, giving you razor-sharp carves without sacrificing stability.
  • Direct-Drive Motor Architecture: We threw out the noisy planetary gearboxes. Zero gear-mesh whine, zero drivetrain friction loss, and total acoustic silence over the bay.
  • Handcrafted Carbon Fleet: Built specifically to survive brutal ocean saltwater abuse across our flagship X-Foil Apex Gen 4 and Escape models.

35 for 35 Track Record & Instant Funding We don't do middleman dealer markups, and we don't make promises we can't ship. Across our team's history, we are 35 for 35 on fulfilled campaigns, raising over $14 million from 54,000+ backers globally.

When we dropped our Flight Ready series on Kickstarter last week, the community went wild: 100% funded in under 30 minutes landing us right in the top 1% tier of campaign launches.

Drop any technical questions below—happy to talk wing hydrodynamics, active stabilization control, direct-drive torque, or ocean testing setups! 🤙

reddit.com
u/XFoil_Official — 10 days ago

35 fulfilled campaigns, $15M raised, and funded in 30 minutes: Why skipping the dealer network is the ultimate hardware strategy.

Building a hardware startup is hard. Distributing a premium hardware product without burning through your margins in traditional retail channels is even harder.

When we set out to build X-Foil, our direct-drive, dynamic-wing electric hydrofoil, we made a strategic decision that ran completely counter to standard marine industry playbook: we refused to build a dealer network.

In consumer watersports, traditional dealership networks demand massive margin cuts (often 30% to 50%) just to sit in a showroom. That middleman markup inflates retail prices, slows down customer feedback loops, and forces engineering teams to cut corners on bill-of-materials (BOM) costs just to preserve profit.

Instead, we chose to bet entirely on direct-to-consumer crowdfunding and agile engineering.

Here is what we’ve learned after 35 fulfilled campaigns, $15 million raised from 54,000+ backers, and our latest Kickstarter hitting 100% funding in 30 minutes:

1. Build Direct-to-Consumer Feedback Loops

By skipping middlemen, every single customer touchpoint comes straight to our product team. When we tested our flagship fleet—including the X-Foil Apex Gen 4 and Escape setups—at our Kaneohe Yacht Club Demo Day in Hawaii, we put 50+ real riders on the water in a single afternoon. That raw, immediate user data feeds straight back into our Silicon Valley engineering cycles within days, not quarters.

2. Invest the Margin into R&D, Not Showroom Rent

Cutting out dealer markups allowed us to allocate capital where it actually creates defensible IP:

  • Engineering out the failure points: Eliminating traditional planetary gearboxes in favor of a silent, custom direct-drive motor.
  • Active stabilization: Developing dynamic control wings that actively stabilize the board in heavy ocean chop.
  • Premium materials: Using handcrafted carbon composite structures that typically get priced out when dealer margins are factored in.

3. Execution Standard: Trust Is Your Ultimate Currency

In hardware crowdfunding, execution track record is everything. Maintaining a 35 for 35 campaign fulfillment record wasn't accidental—it required total transparency around supply chain timelines, ocean stress-testing validation, and battery freight compliance.

When we dropped the X-Foil Apex Gen 4 and Escape models on Kickstarter, that established trust translated directly into momentum: landing in the top 1 percentile of campaign launches almost instantly.

The Takeaway for Hardware Founders:

Don't let legacy distribution models dictate how you sell your product. If you build superior technology, price it fairly by eliminating bloated middleman networks, and prove your ability to deliver time after time, your community will fund your growth directly.

Would love to hear from other hardware founders in the community—how are you approaching D2C distribution versus traditional channel partners in your industry?

reddit.com
u/XFoil_Official — 10 days ago

XFOIL Apex Gen 4 hit 100% Kickstarter funding in 30 minutes — 50+ ocean demos at Kaneohe Yacht Club and why traditional/legacy eFoils are becoming obsolete.

What an absolute week for the team.

We just wrapped up our Demo Day at the Kaneohe Yacht Club here in Hawaii, and the energy on the docks was unreal. Over 100 people came through, we got 50+ riders out on the water, gave away a ton of free apparel, and had our full fleet running non-stop (Apex, Escape, and Alpha 2).

Event footage

Testimonies

The highlight of the event? Paul McDonald (Hawaii E-Foil Extravaganza Race Champion 2025) stopped by to pick up his new Escape board and took our Dynamic Wings out for a spin in the bay.

Race winner from 2025

His feedback after stepping off the board was huge for our engineering team:

"Easier for beginners, smoother for experienced riders."

The Apex Kickstarter Flight On top of the event, we officially launched our Apex Gen 4 campaign on Kickstarter last week after our Founder Series completely sold out on our site last month.

The response was insane—the Apex Gen 4 hit 100% funding in under 30 minutes and putting the project in the top 1% tier of campaign launches.

Kickstarter XFoil Apex ranked in top 1&#37; of crowdfunding

Why traditional eFoils are shaken For years, the first-generation eFoil market has been dominated by noisy planetary gearboxes (that whine across quiet bays and lose 5-15% of power to friction/heat) and rigid fixed-wing designs that offer zero active flight control.

We engineered XFOIL in Silicon Valley and tested it in Hawaii's heaviest ocean conditions specifically to kill off those legacy pain points:

  • Direct Drive Motor Architecture: Near-total acoustic silence, maximum torque, and zero gear-on-gear maintenance.
  • Dynamic Wings: Active, thrust-driven flight stabilization so the board actually works with you instead of fighting the chop.

Superior in handling

Superior in noise

As direct-drive silence and active dynamic wings take over, traditional fixed-wing setups are quickly realizing how far behind legacy hardware has fallen.

Massive mahalo to the Kaneohe Yacht Club leadership team for hosting us, and to everyone who came out to ride. We're shipping globally and keeping the pedal to the floor.

Drop any tech or engineering questions below, happy to talk direct-drive motors, wing dynamics, or ocean testing setup!

reddit.com
u/XFoil_Official — 10 days ago
▲ 0 r/eFoil_Future+1 crossposts

Developing the XFoil Apex Made Us Question an Industry Standard

When we started developing the XFoil Apex, one question kept coming up during testing:

Why do eFoils still force riders to choose between lift and speed?

Every fixed-wing setup seems to require the same compromise.

A larger wing provides easy takeoffs, low-speed stability, and a forgiving ride, but as speed increases, drag becomes more noticeable.

A smaller wing delivers higher speeds and a more agile feel, but getting onto foil takes more skill, more power, and often more battery.

The accepted solution across the industry has been to own multiple wings and swap them depending on the conditions or your riding style.

From an engineering perspective, we kept asking ourselves:

What if the wing could adapt during the ride instead of forcing the rider to swap hardware?

That question turned into years of research and development.

On paper it sounded straightforward.

In reality, it meant solving problems involving hydrodynamic efficiency, structural loading, marine durability, carbon fiber manufacturing, corrosion resistance, vibration, and long-term reliability.

Some prototypes looked fantastic in CAD but behaved unpredictably once they hit real water.

Others survived durability testing but introduced enough turbulence that any theoretical efficiency gains disappeared.

Marine environments have a way of exposing every weakness in a design.

Side-by-side comparison of a traditional fixed-wing eFoil and the XFoil Apex Adaptive Wing System under similar riding conditions. Rather than simply describing the concept, we wanted people to see the difference for themselves.

One area we focused heavily on was reducing drag at higher speeds while maintaining predictable lift during takeoff and lower-speed riding. The goal wasn't simply to go faster—it was to create a system that could adapt across a wider range of riding conditions without requiring riders to swap wings.

Another area that became surprisingly important during development was stability.

As we continued refining the platform, we built an Automatic Stabilization System designed to help the board maintain a more consistent and predictable ride. The objective wasn't to replace rider skill, but to reduce unwanted oscillation and allow the board to respond more naturally as conditions change.

Rather than trying to explain how that feels, we found it was much easier to demonstrate.

Developing automatic stabilization wasn't a straight line. This compilation shows some of our early autonomous tests—from repeated instability and failed attempts to progressively more controlled flight, culminating in stable, self-correcting behavior. We thought it was more valuable to show the entire development process than only the final result.

Developing the XFoil Apex Gen 4 reinforced something we've learned about hardware development:

The biggest innovations often come from questioning assumptions that everyone has accepted as normal.

Sometimes an industry standard exists because it's genuinely the best solution.

Other times, it's simply the solution everyone has become comfortable designing around.

That's what made this project so interesting.

Instead of asking how to build a better fixed wing, we asked whether the fixed-wing compromise itself was worth challenging.

I'm curious what the foiling community thinks.

  • Have you found yourself switching between multiple wings depending on conditions?
  • Do you think adaptive foil geometry has practical long-term potential, or does the added mechanical complexity outweigh the benefits?
  • What differences do you notice in the side-by-side comparison?
  • If you could redesign one aspect of today's eFoil systems—wings, propulsion, batteries, controls, stabilization, or something else—what would you change?

I'd genuinely enjoy hearing other riders' perspectives, especially from those who've spent time experimenting with different foil setups.

reddit.com
u/XFoil_Official — 25 days ago
▲ 2 r/FuckDealerships+1 crossposts

How an entrenched "legacy cartel" tried to kill our hardware startup (And the brutal math of DTC vs Dealer Networks)

Hey r/entrepreneur,

Hardware is famously hard. If you've ever tried to bring a high-end physical product to market via crowdfunding, you know the script: engineering bottlenecks, supply chain nightmares, and intense community pressure when timelines slip. We’ve lived every single second of that reality over the last few years building XFoil, an electric hydrofoil (eFoil) company.

But there’s a second boss battle in hardware that people don't talk about enough: what happens when your pricing model threatens an entrenched legacy industry.

The standard cost for a premium carbon fiber eFoil from the established legacy brands sits right around $12,000 to $15,000. When we set out, we realized the actual manufacturing costs didn't justify that price tag for the consumer. The inflation exists because the industry relies on a massive "Middleman Markup"—traditional dealer networks that require a $3,000 to $6,000 margin per board just to move product.

We decided to go Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) to sell a premium board at $6,499. By cutting out the dealer network, we could pass the savings to the rider.
Then the empire struck back.

We recently hosted a local race event where our board actually clocked the fastest lap times against legacy competitors costing three times as much. Shortly after, independent shops who gave our gear positive reviews started facing immense pressure. We found out that corporate legacy networks were allegedly threatening to pull their dealer statuses from local shops if they didn't scrub positive coverage of our direct-to-consumer boards from the internet.

When an industry cartel realizes they can't beat your engineering or your pricing on the water, they resort to gatekeeping the distribution channels.

As a startup founder, it’s a bizarre milestone. On one hand, wrestling with manufacturing delays and supply chains is incredibly humbling. On the other hand, seeing a multi-million dollar corporate network panic enough to bully local shops tells us our direct-to-consumer thesis is exactly right.

For the hardware founders out there: how have you handled anti-competitive gatekeeping from incumbents when disrupting a high-margin industry?

I wrote a deeper breakdown of the specific dealer margins, the manufacturing math, and the pushback we faced on our blog here: xfoil.com/blogs/news/why-other-efoils-cost-15000 

u/XFoil_Official — 1 month ago

Why online eFoil reviews are heavily polarized (And how to look past the hidden forum gatekeepers)

Hey everyone,

We’ve noticed a lot of intensely polarized discussions across the web recently regarding eFoil startups, crowdfunding history, and product rollouts. Some of it is fair curiosity, but a lot of it is driven by distinct economic motivations from entrenched legacy actors who are terrified of direct-to-consumer pricing.

As we get ready to drop the full Gen 4 evolution video showing exactly how far the engineering has come, we wanted to address the elephant in the room head-on.

We just published a deep-dive piece on the main blog breaking down the hidden forces shaping the forums you read—contrasting the Traditional Dealer Model ($12K-$15K markup networks) against the DTC model, and separating subjective forum noise from verifiable engineering benchmarks (specs and raw material builds).

Our founder recorded a quick, direct video addressing our early fulfillment history, current live inventory, and why D2C pricing triggers legacy dealers: 📺 Watch: Is XFoil Legit or Fake? The Truth About Shipping & Direct Pricing: https://youtu.be/PaxztpvVrCY

If you want a clear framework on how to parse the noise, read the full piece here:

https://xfoil.com/blogs/news/xfoil-reviews-how-to-evaluate-reddit-facebook-groups-and-online-efoil-discussions

True brand health isn't defined by a perfectly frictionless legacy market structure; it’s defined by a relentless commitment to engineering refinement and transitioning our riders onto the water.

Let the rider decide. Drop your thoughts below.

u/XFoil_Official — 1 month ago

Why Do Premium eFoils Cost $15,000+? Understanding eFoil Pricing, Manufacturing, and Value

One of the most common questions we see from riders researching electric hydrofoils is:

“Why do some eFoils cost $15,000 or more?”

The electric hydrofoil industry is still relatively young, and pricing can vary significantly between brands. Understanding why products are priced differently helps riders make more informed decisions.

We put together an article explaining some of the factors that influence eFoil pricing, including:

• Materials and construction
• Engineering and product development
• Manufacturing approaches
• Distribution models
• Dealer networks and retail costs
• Direct-to-consumer models

At XFoil, we chose a different approach by focusing on direct communication with riders and reducing traditional distribution layers. Our goal is to make advanced electric hydrofoil technology more accessible while continuing to focus on engineering, performance, and customer support.

The purpose of this article is not to tell riders what they should buy. Every brand has its own approach, and every rider has different priorities.

Our goal is simply to provide more transparency into how this industry works and help riders better understand what goes into the cost of an electric hydrofoil.

Read the article here:
https://xfoil.com/blogs/news/why-other-efoils-cost-15-000-and-why-ours-doesnt

We welcome constructive discussion from riders, builders, and anyone interested in the future of electric hydrofoiling.

u/XFoil_Official — 1 month ago