u/aarrtee
r/Dentistry r/wildlifephotography r/CanonCamera r/Delaware r/Funnymemes r/airplanes r/sunrise r/ExposurePorn r/photography r/CameraLenses r/natureporn r/canon r/aviation r/BirdPhotography r/GrammarPolice r/TheNightFeeling r/AmateurPhotography r/AskPhotography r/Leica r/BuyItForLife r/Casual_Photography
▲ 0 r/GrammarPolice
I'm an amateur photographer. It is my passion. New, younger photographers at Reddit use some strange phrases. But they are repeated: "I'm rocking a Nikon DSLR."
I want a camera with a vintage aesthetic.
I need a camera that produces a cinematic vibe.
u/aarrtee — 11 days ago
▲ 0 r/GrammarPolice
Anybody have an explanation for this common spelling error: "lense"?
It seems to be all over Reddit.
u/aarrtee — 11 days ago
▲ 86 r/Delaware
Probably Frontier flight F92696 PHL to SJU, passing Cape Henlopen, Delaware [OC]
u/aarrtee — 2 months ago
▲ 20 r/aviation
Probably Frontier flight F92696 PHL to SJU, passing Cape Henlopen, Delaware [OC]
u/aarrtee — 2 months ago
▲ 59 r/Delaware
Rehoboth Beach at 3 AM, NJ on the horizon. Very long exposure.
u/aarrtee — 2 months ago
▲ 2 r/canon
Initial impressions of two wide aperture lenses: Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM vs. Voigtlander RF 50mm f/1.0 for Canon RF
i only intend to keep one of these lenses. I have not tested them yet with their intended use: portraits in low light. I have tested them on static objects.
My findings are similar to what online reviewers have said. Fair amount of vignetting with the Voigtlander. Some purple/green areas where there is a contrasty area. Easily fixed in post processing. The difference in background blur between a shot at f/1 and the other camera at f/1.2 is... so far...minimal.
Online reviewers commented on the joy of using the Voigtlander and the unique character of the shots. I will reserve judgement on that when I image some people. So far, i prefer the much cheaper Canon lens.
u/aarrtee — 3 months ago
▲ 2 r/CameraLenses
Initial impressions of two wide aperture lenses: Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM vs. Voigtlander RF 50mm f/1.0 for Canon RF
i only intend to keep one of these lenses. I have not tested them yet with their intended use: portraits in low light. I have tested them on static objects.
My findings are similar to what online reviewers have said. Fair amount of vignetting with the Voigtlander. Some purple/green areas where there is a contrasty area. Easily fixed in post processing. The difference in background blur between a shot at f/1 and the other camera at f/1.2 is... so far...minimal.
Online reviewers commented on the joy of using the Voigtlander and the unique character of the shots. I will reserve judgement on that when I image some people. So far, i prefer the much cheaper Canon lens.
u/aarrtee — 3 months ago
▲ 3 r/CanonCamera
Initial impressions of two wide aperture lenses: Canon RF45mm F1.2 STM vs. Voigtlander RF 50mm f/1.0 for Canon RF
i only intend to keep one of these lenses. I have not tested them yet with their intended use: portraits in low light. I have tested them on static objects.
My findings are similar to what online reviewers have said. Fair amount of vignetting with the Voigtlander. Some purple/green areas where there is a contrasty area. Easily fixed in post processing. The difference in background blur between a shot at f/1 and the other camera at f/1.2 is... so far...minimal.
Online reviewers commented on the joy of using the Voigtlander and the unique character of the shots. I will reserve judgement on that when I image some people. So far, i prefer the much cheaper Canon lens.
u/aarrtee — 3 months ago