HD 560S + SoundID Virtual Monitoring vs Slate VSX: did I overestimate VSX?
I’m curious to hear from people who have actually used both.
I had a pair of Sennheiser HD 560S with SoundID Reference including Virtual Monitoring. I knew SoundID already had room simulation, headphone calibration, and translation checks.
Still, I returned the HD 560S and bought Slate VSX because I assumed the dedicated hardware/software ecosystem would be a more trustworthy mixing solution than a general headphone profile + virtual room system.
Now I’m wondering if I overestimated that difference.
The HD 560S sounded very good to me as open-back headphones, while VSX is a more expensive closed-back system. Since SoundID already offers headphone-specific calibration, Virtual Monitoring, and more translation checks, I’m trying to understand what the real-world advantage of VSX is today.
For people who have used both:
- Is VSX still meaningfully better for mix translation?
- Is the room/imaging realism noticeably ahead of SoundID Virtual Monitoring?
- Would you choose VSX over HD 560S + SoundID VM if you already had that setup?
- Or is the difference mostly workflow/preference rather than a clear upgrade?
Not trying to start a brand war. I’m genuinely looking for practical experiences from people who have mixed on both.