How suburbs shrank a teenager’s world down to one building: School
▲ 108 r/STNorthampton+1 crossposts

How suburbs shrank a teenager’s world down to one building: School

In 1969, almost half of American kids walked or biked to school. By 2009, about one in eight did. Somewhere in those forty years, the suburbs shrank a teenager’s world down to one building, and school became the only place left to see your friends. This video shows how it happened: schools got bigger and farther from home, a 1980s milk-carton panic grew around stranger kidnappings that almost never happened, and malls started turning away teens who came without a parent. Then it goes to Volos, Greece, a city where teenagers still have plenty of places to go besides school.

youtube.com
u/axlekb — 5 days ago

PSA: Valley Green Energy electric rates going up in November (13.2¢ → 16.3¢/kWh in Northampton)

You probably just got something in the mail:

If you live in Northampton, Amherst, or Pelham, you were probably put on Valley Green Energy (VGE) as your electricity supplier by default a couple of years ago. The current contract ends in November, and the new prices are significantly higher.

New VGE Basic rates (Nov 2026 – Nov 2028):

Town Current New
Northampton 13.206¢/kWh 16.290¢/kWh
Amherst / Pelham 13.206¢/kWh 15.830¢/kWh

You can do better. There are currently plans on energyswitchma.gov for 14.9¢/kWh on a 12-month term with no cancellation fee. And if you change your mind, you can always switch back to VGE.

Before you switch:

  • Watch out for automatic renewal. Many plans roll over to a much higher variable rate when the 12 months are up. Set a calendar reminder a few weeks before your contract expires so you can shop again or go back to VGE.
  • Compare like for like. VGE Basic is the minimum renewable content required by law, so compare it against other minimum-renewable plans.

Your utility (Eversource or National Grid) still handles delivery, billing, and outages no matter which supplier you pick. Only the supply portion of your bill changes.

Source: VGE program prices

reddit.com
u/axlekb — 11 days ago

1970s TOPICS - Traffic Operations Program to Increase Capacity and Safety

The Gazette has featured the TOPICS program in their "A look back" section for 50 years ago.

I wondered, "What was the TOPICS program?", and found the article in the images attached in Traffic quarterly v.26 1972. Thought it was worth sharing!

Here's the text from Gazette:

1972:

March 1: Federal and state funds of more than $204,000 to improve traffic control and capacity on the present Route 9 are in the works for Northampton with the completion of planning for the TOPICS program, Mayor Sean M. Dunphy said today. To expedite traffic flow and reduce parking congestion in the downtown area, all angle parking on Main Street would be converted to parallel parking as would angle parking on Elm Street to Prospect Street.

1976:

April 30: New traffic lights as well as sidewalk and road construction are part of the federal TOPICS program (Traffic Operations Program to Improve Capacity and Safety) in Northampton. Workmen are now installing a traffic light on the corner of Elm Street and Bedford Terrace.

July 3: The TOPICS program in Northampton may be jeopardized because of a dispute involving a parking lot owned by Hampshire County. Officials had hoped to alleviate the loss of downtown parking, the source of greatest contention in TOPICS design, by transforming the county-owned parking lot across from the courthouse into a metered city parking lot, but the need for county parking has increased to such a degree that the county may have to retain some spaces.

July 16: The Northampton City Council tonight is expected to vote to approve the controversial downtown traffic changes proposed under the state and federally funded Traffic Operations Plan to Increase Capacity and Safety (TOPICS) program. A straw poll conducted by the Gazette today found that six of the nine councilors expect to vote in favor of the plan.

August 3: Opponents of the TOPICS program for downtown Northampton said today they will mount a petition drive to put the question on the November ballot in the wake of City Council approval of the measure last night. The controversial $1.3 million program to improve traffic flow and safety in the Main Street area was approved by a 6 to 3 vote.

August 14: Some 2,000 city voters have signed petitions asking the City Council to rescind its approval of the controversial TOPICS program, or, if that fails, to put the question on the November ballot. Some merchants and others object to the plan because it will remove some 80 parking spaces from Main Street.

September 2: The head of the state’s TOPICS program said last night that the state has no intention of imposing the controversial traffic control program on downtown Northampton. The TOPICS (Traffic Operations Program to Increase Capacity and Safety) program — which includes a series of major changes on the city’s Main Street, among them elimination of angle parking, installation of new traffic signals and large traffic islands, and creation of some one-way streets — has become increasingly controversial in the last few weeks.

September 4: The stage has been set for a city-wide vote on the controversial Traffic Operations Plan to Increase Capacity and Safety (TOPICS) program in October or November in the wake of the City Council’s reaffirmation last night of its support for the plan. The matter will now go before the voters of Northampton in a referendum to be held at a special election this fall.

u/axlekb — 1 month ago

Streetsblog Massachusetts: Damon Road more accident-prone after changes

I know the accident was previously shared here, but now there is some additional context:

Pre-construction period (7/1/2017 – 9/1/2019):

  • Total recorded crashes: 86
  • Property Damage Only: 70
  • Injury: 16

Post-construction period (7/1/2024 – 9/1/2026):

  • Total recorded crashes: 148
  • Property Damage Only: 118
  • Injury: 30

Percentage changes:

  • Total crashes increased from 86 to 148, a rise of 72.1%
  • Property Damage only increased from 70 to 118, a rise of 68.6%
  • Injury increased from 16 to 30, a rise of 87.5%

Edit:
People were asking for traffic counts here they are:

Wed 8/27/2025 looks wrong. If instead we used a conservative 20,000, the traffic would be up ~8.3% over the M / Tu / W 2018 M / Tu / W readings.

85th percentile speeds are up 10mph.
https://mhd.public.ms2soft.com/tcds/tsearch.asp?loc=Mhd&mod=

Date Int Pace 85th Total
Wed 8/27/2025 15 30 - 40 39 617
Tue 8/26/2025 15 30 - 40 39 19,539
Mon 8/25/2025 15 30 - 40 39 19,852
Wed 9/26/2018 15 20 - 30 29 18,649
Tue 9/25/2018 15 20 - 30 29 18,225
Mon 9/24/2018 15 20 - 30 29 17,958
Tue 9/27/2016 15 20 - 30 28 18,292
Mon 9/26/2016 15 20 - 30 29 17,850
Tue 9/16/2014 15 25 - 35 32 19,359
Mon 9/15/2014 15 25 - 35 32 19,073
mass.streetsblog.org
u/axlekb — 1 month ago

North Elm St Milling

Just wanted to give everyone a heads up that the city has milled North Elm St between the high school and the hospital. This is beyond the original scope of the high school intersection project and was not included in the publicly shared designs.

The current design here is a bike lane between a parking lane and 35mph high frequency traffic lane and is explicitly called out as only "adequate facility for bicyclists with moderate-to-high levels of experience and confidence" for Elm St in Strategy 1.B of the 2017 PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

This section of roadway has not been publicly discussed (as far as I'm aware), but it seems like the city will just put back exactly what was there before: a bike lane between parked cars and high-speed and high-frequency traffic that leads to a high school.

# PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 
1-B. Elm Street Separated Bike Lanes (Downtown Inset
Project #18) – The current striped bicycle lanes on Elm Street
provide an adequate facility for bicyclists with moderate-to-
high levels of experience and confidence riding in the roadway
adjacent to traffic. Although additional study is required—
especially at the intersections—it may be possible to flip the
orientation of the parking and the bike lane, so that parked cars
buffer bicyclists from moving traffic. Separated bike lanes are
on-street bike facilities but intended to evoke a similar feeling
of separation as riding along a rail trail or path. (Responsible
agencies: Department of Planning & Sustainability, Department of
Public Works, and Transportation and Parking Committee)
reddit.com
u/axlekb — 1 month ago
▲ 1.1k r/STNorthampton+3 crossposts

Tactical Urbanism: White Duct Tape creates protected bike lane intersection where Louisa was killed.

u/axlekb — 2 months ago
▲ 199 r/realburlington+3 crossposts

Vacancy Tax: a constructive proposal for Downtown Burlington

*edited to correct the fee structure in place

I come here today to address this fine community forum with a concept that I’ve been stewing on since the sale of 188 Main Street to the “Sisters and Brothers Investment Group” (aka the Handy family), and the subsequent closure of Nectars. The Handys also own the holding company called Great Cedars that owns the vacant 45,000 sq. ft. former Burlington Free Press building at 127/129 S. Winooski Ave, which is right behind Nectars. 

My premise is this - this type of predatory landlording could be subverted with a Vacancy Tax. I’m talking serious money that disincentivizes the hoarding of downtown buildings just to speculate, rather than to foster successful businesses or other entities that benefit our community.

This would also CERTAINLY apply to Merrill’s Roxy  - a bastion of the failed movie theater business of the 1900s held hostage by its namesake. Both of these landlords are strangling the city by holding onto these properties - the Handys don’t even have a price listed for the former Free Press building, and the Nectars building is wrapped up in an extremely expensive triple-net deal, which is horrifically bad for any future tenant unlucky enough to decide to rent from these malignant capitalists. Neither of these buildings are for sale - the Handys are notorious hodlers (https://freehandys.net/). The Roxy? You can buy it for top dollar, but you can’t make it a movie theater! (Side note - Merrill’s dad had the same stipulation when he sold the Flynn to the nonprofit that took it over). So you’d have to fully gut it and renovate the property you were to buy it and make something. All because little Merrill Jarvis is scared about competition against his other shit-box of a theater MULTIPLE TOWNS AWAY in Williston. 

Current Losses / Write-offs

This is where I make a few assumptions, and I encourage discourse in the comments from anyone that knows more than me. Because both of these landlords own multiple properties, the losses incurred by the lack of tenancy become write-offs against their other properties. Meanwhile, that’s lost revenue for the city and state on multiple fronts - the taxes generated from customers coming and going, the payroll taxes, the property taxes that are being written off. Plus, secondary effects - folks paying for parking, going out to dinner before a movie, hitting the shops on Church Street before dinner, or going out to a bar after the movie. All three of these properties have become gaping wounds in the current dire circumstances of Burlington, and they also represent a failure of policy and capitalism. But it does NOT need to be this way.

Current City Policy

What recourse does the city have to incentivize this to change? Let’s say you’re a landlord in Burlington and you own a vacant building. You are obligated to register it with the city as vacant and pay a $1500/quarter permitting fee (this was raised by 100% in 2025). This is an administrative fee, not a penalty. And this administrative fee can almost certainly be written off. Don’t pay the fee? The city charges you $25 as a late fee or 12% annually as interest.  Plus, if you fail to register, you get slapped with a whopping $500 fine, which can be charged each time the cities decides you’re in noncompliance, which is really…. Once? Maybe once a year? That $6,000/year fee is administrative, not punitive - according to Burlington’s attorney general, the city can only recoup administrative costs, not serve deterrent fines, and for some reason that $500 fine is the penalty limit under current city codes.

If your Vacancy permit expires, you can get charged $200/day for noncompliance, which can be up to $73k per year, if it's actually enforced.

If you still don’t pay the fees or interest, they becomes a lien on your property. That means that when the building is refinanced or sold, the city can forcibly collect the unpaid debts. Knowing the Handy family and their real estate empire, that will occur sometime after the apocalypse but before the next big bang. If the city decides to sue for that money, the Handys will inevitably tie the city up in court, which historically has dragged on for YEARS. It’s very, very unlikely that $8000 of fees would warrant those legal bills.

Proposal / Idea

My proposal is that we (the people) invoke an actual tax/penalty/deterrent against holding commercial properties hostage. This fee would need to be significant - the purpose would be two-fold - recover the lost tax revenue from that property not hosting a thriving business (lost potential), and to disincentivize landlords from being able to use buildings as tax write-offs at the expense of the commons.

This can come about in two ways - a municipal ballot measure, or a state-wide congressional effort. This was actually brought as proposal H.443 to the Vermont House Ways and Means Committee just last year by Rep. Monique Priestley of Bradford, Rep. Teddy Waszazak of Barre City, and Rep. Rebecca Holcombe of Norwich. They’re all Democrats, and the latter two sit on that House Ways and Means Committee where the bill stalled out. I really think that every downtown block in the state could benefit from downward pressure from the government onto landlords to maintain occupancy of the precious few downtown building - I imagine this applying, at least initially, just to commercial buildings with the purpose of re-invigorating local economies. 

Let’s say there was a tax like this - if you’re going to buy a building, you’d want to insure that you have a tenant ready to move in. Or perhaps the business itself would be more likely to own the building - something Merrill himself was lucky enough to inherit from his family. The tax would need to be more severe than the write-offs that are incurred by holding an unprofitable property. Ideally, people wouldn’t buy properties to speculate. Of course there could be exceptions and petitions to the city - maybe they need to vacate the property to renovate it on a particular timeline, or they need a year after buying it to find a tenant due to harsh financial conditions out of their control. But these would need to be communicated clearly with the city, and if bad faith is shown and the rent isn’t dropped to accommodate the local market, the owner would get slapped with taxes to incentivize them to find a client or SELL to somebody that would.

Legal Inspiration

This model DOES exist in other parts of the country. Washington DC re-categorized vacant buildings into a higher tax bracket - vacant property owners pay nearly 6x the standard residential rate, and if the property is blighted, that goes up to 12x. This isn’t a penalty or a fee, it’s literally a change to the tax code. And DC actually announced in 2025 that they’re raising this tax even more in 2027! 

In Vermont, this would likely require state-level action to empower municipalities to wager this change to the tax code. A simple ballot measure would allow the city to slap fees and penalties on owners of vacant properties, but are more susceptible to legal challenges.

In Closing

My closing statement: These vacancies are blights on the city, both physically, financially, and morally, and I have come to believe that a Vacancy Tax could help push the needle towards a more community-friendly city that doesn’t prioritize speculative landlords or stingy sellers. Sure, Merrill can block the sale of his theater to a movie theater developer, but he’ll have to pay to be that picky, and really weigh his values - does he fear competition, or financial pressure to sell? My hope would be the latter, since that has the common good in mind. Thank you for reading, and I look forward to discussing this more in the comments.

(I own a small business in Downtown Burlington - we rent a space, so I am forced to think about these types landlord/tenant relationships ad nauseam. I also drive past all three properties I mentioned daily on my commute to my business.)

u/ClimbThatTree — 2 months ago

Guest columnist Max Hartshorne: How Link413 finally connects three counties

>If you spend any time in Franklin County, you start to notice something that rarely gets mentioned when people talk about life in rural New England: a lot of people here don’t drive. You see it in Greenfield early in the morning, when the FRTA buses begin their loops and riders gather at the transit center. You see it in Northampton, where PVTA buses at the Academy of Music pile on students, workers, and older adults across the river or up Routes 5&10. And you see it in North Adams, where a surprising number of households don’t have a car at all. We imagine this part of the state as a place where everyone has a vehicle in the driveway. The truth is different. Because all of the people I know have cars, I have rarely given fair thought to those without. But let’s dig deeper, with a bit of empathy, because people suffer from not having cars; it makes life much harder.

gazettenet.com
u/axlekb — 2 months ago

Concord Monitor: On Main: Ten years after Concord's Main Street project, what's next for downtown?

While Main Street always had “good bones,” none of these additions would have occurred without the renovation, Sink argued. 

concordmonitor.com
u/axlekb — 2 months ago

Concord Monitor: On Main: People like downtown Concord, but they want more

June 26, 2026: “Ever since the last redo, there’s more people, more young people, especially in the evening, eating outside,” said Taranow. “It used to be a place where people came to work and go home. Now, it’s not. If you sit outside at nine o’clock on a Friday night, there are people walking by constantly. That was never the way it was.”

concordmonitor.com
u/axlekb — 2 months ago
▲ 29 r/STNorthampton+1 crossposts

How much does a new roundabout cost

Genuine question because there are some horrible 4 way stops in Northampton that could really benefit from a roundabout. Amherst seems to put in new roundabouts on a weekly basis so I’m just curious what it would cost, as I assume cost is the limiting factor?

Prime candidates are the intersection of 66 and West Farms / Glendale (not a 4 way but should be for safety), Burts Pit and Florence Rd, and of course Prospect and Jackson / Woodlawn. They did the one at Look Park so it can be done! Just genuinely curious why we don’t have more especially given the safety risk.

reddit.com
u/Accomplished-Rise806 — 2 months ago
▲ 345 r/STNorthampton+3 crossposts

The new Lafayette Street bike lanes are a work of absolute genius, let me explain:

u/MiserNYC- — 2 months ago

AARP's Fighting for Street Safety for Older Adults

"Mike Roeger has spent long stretches of his life getting by without a car.

Growing up in Fort Wayne, Indiana, Roeger and his nine siblings often had to bike, walk or catch rides with friends because the family shared one car. Roeger regularly trekked nearly two miles to high school. Even his dad would walk 45 minutes each way to work. It set an example for Roeger that he carried into adulthood.

“It’s important for people to be able to get around without driving,” he says.

aarp.org
u/axlekb — 2 months ago
▲ 253 r/STNorthampton+2 crossposts

Somerville has gone 4 years without a traffic death. Here’s how New England’s densest city did it.

SOMERVILLE — Chelsea Quenneville can still recall Union Square as it was a decade ago: a chaotic crossing with cars and bikes barreling along four lanes of Somerville Avenue — a virtual “free for all.”

But on Monday, she sat at a shaded outdoor table in a commercial hub transformed. Traffic was restricted to one lane in either direction, slowed by concrete refuge islands. Pedestrians walked along a raised crosswalk adorned with flashing lights. Down the block, there were new cutouts for drop-off zones, handicap parking, and an extended curb that bulged 10 feet into Walnut Street.

“It should be like this,” Quenneville said.

Union Square is but one of the busy places Somerville has sought to make safer for pedestrians, motorists, and cyclists alike. Its efforts yielded results almost unheard of in any urban area, much less the most densely populated city in New England: No one has died in a traffic collision on Somerville streets for four years.

“Somerville has done a great job taking advantage of every opportunity that arises,” said Brendan Kearney, executive director of the pedestrian advocacy group WalkMassachusetts. “It’s an exercise in not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.”

While other communities in Massachusetts have had to confront traffic deaths, from highway drivers to cyclists, serious crashes in Somerville dropped by 50 percent in 2025 from the year before.

Three other Massachusetts cities, including Boston, subscribe to a policy called Vision Zero that incorporates traffic controls and street designs to eliminate roadway fatalities completely. Only in Somerville has that become a reality.

City officials have installed 139 striped speed humps on busy corridors since 2019. Chaotic traffic circles are slathered with flex posts and stop signs. Flowerbeds and large landscape planters provide a shield for some bike paths from adjacent car traffic.

It took a “whole of government approach,” said Somerville director of mobility Brad Rawson.

Drivers are speeding less, city studies show, in part because road safety furniture and new laws have made it near impossible to drive fast. Moreover, Somerville has been able to achieve this without significantly stepping up enforcement against speeding and distracted driving.

Instead, Rawson and his colleagues assist with larger safety redesigns to major corridors operated by state officials, such as an impending makeover of McGrath Highway, and focus much of their time on smaller, discrete traffic measures on city-controlled streets. That spans everything from painting hundreds of yield triangles on roads to installing street signs in braille.

Preventative traffic measures do require more people and more money. Just the 21-mile expansion of separated bike lanes is projected to cost nearly $10 million in the next four years, according to a city report. Since 2018, Somerville has added more than a dozen people to its mobility, engineering, parking, and public works staffs, who together paper neighborhood sidewalks with fliers, field 311 calls, and host safety workshops as part of 120 community events held last year.

But the most effective traffic calming strategy in Somerville can also easily become a cultural firestorm: slowing down cars.

Citywide, the default speed limit is 25 miles per hour, and drivers are expected to slow to 20 mph in 500 high-pedestrian “safety zones” scattered around 4 square city miles. The city’s rollout of speed humps was, well, bumpy, and the deployment of small-scale rotaries in neighborhoods left some initially confused about how to navigate them.

Still, the likelihood of an injury “spikes dramatically” when a car travels above 35 miles per hour, said former Somerville mayor Joe Curtatone. But those incidents are now infrequent: Somerville has had just 46 crashes with serious injuries since 2021, a Globe analysis of state crash data.

“You’re always going to be faced with the question of, if there’s not enough parking or too many bikes,” said Curtatone, who led the city for 18 years until leaving office in 2022. “What about if there are too many cars?”

Boston and Cambridge, both larger cities than Somerville, recorded 560 and 112 serious crashes last year respectively. At least 48 people have died in Boston traffic incidents since Somerville last had a roadway fatality.

Improved public transit has also been a key factor in Somerville’s success. A long-overdue expansion of the Green Line — and the 2014 addition of the Assembly Square Orange Line stop — raised the proportion of residents living within a half-mile of T station from 15 to 85 percent.

Using legislation from Cambridge as a model, Somerville charted its own safe streets ordinance in 2024, following several high-profile pedestrian crashes that killed a teacher, a mother of two, and a cyclist — the last of which happened on Aug. 12, 2022, almost exactly four years ago. The law gave city planners license to speed up their work.

Somerville Mayor Jake Wilson has no plans to slow the momentum, calling street safety “personal” in a statement. He said his daughter was struck in a crosswalk by a car last fall, though she walked away with only a bruise.

“No city can promise to fully eliminate traffic deaths or crashes — but what we can do is keep driving down that risk by deploying the proven interventions that keep us all safer,” he said.

Alienating car users is still, at least politically, a nonstarter. People are driving more, state data show, and on-street parking remains a pain point with some voters. Yet Somerville officials have gradually normalized the trade-off of fewer parking spots for safer streets and encouraged the use of alternate modes of transit. The long-term goal, ultimately, is to have 75 percent of trips citywide happening without a car.

This works for Laura Brooks, a four-decade Somerville resident. She walks, bikes, and drives each week. And though she said speeding on her street is still a persistent problem, “I don’t really have an issue with parking,” Brooks said. “Anyway, there are so many ways to get around.”

In fact, Somerville’s proactive approach to mobility is a “big part of why I love living here,” said Stephanie Galaitsi, a resident and member of the Somerville Alliance for Safe Streets. “We have these calmer streets. It doesn’t feel like we’re OK with people dying on the roads anymore.”

Somerville often makes information on safe streets easily accessible. Each redesign project has a webpage that displays public comments and blog post updates on its progress. Residents can peruse maps of the calming measures installed and paving plans for most Somerville streets online.

The city also splits its street safety budget between routine maintenance and other improvements, while trying to use a variety of funding sources. “So not all your eggs are in one basket,” said Brian Postlewaite, Somerville’s director of engineering.

Next door, Boston has struggled to get the same results. Mayor Michelle Wu stalled most street safety projects for over a year amid criticism for her approach to bike lanes, the Globe has reported. Many plans were resurrected in July in response to the cycling death of city planner Louisa Gag.

Already, Boston is a leader in preventing road fatalities compared to other car-centric cities nationwide.

But Chris Osgood, Boston’s newly appointed interim chief of streets, said the city is redesigning its streets project process by “taking somewhat of a similar approach” to Somerville and plans to update its own Vision Zero plan by the year’s end.

The aim is to ”reduce the overall timeline to get streets projects into construction," he said.

But improvements are not happening fast enough for some Bostonians, including Roslindale resident Corie Scibelli. She was discouraged when Boston removed newer speed humps from her neighborhood, citing concerns about access for emergency vehicles .

It was another item Scibelli included on her list of “daily disappointments” with Boston street safety, she said. “It adds to my general sense of fury and rage.”

Pedestrians on Tufts Street passed an extended curb that affords room for a park bench.Lane Turner/Globe Staff

In Somerville, by contrast, officials see untouched opportunities everywhere. During an hourlong walk around Union Square, Rawson and Postlewaite pointed to dozens of spots they’re desperate to address. The westbound traffic on Bow Street, they said, is a danger zone for “double-threat” crashes, in which a driver in one lane might stop for a pedestrian but the motorist in the adjacent lane doesn’t. The intersection of Washington and Beacon streets needs protected bike lanes. There are dozens of outstanding candidates for bus-only lanes and commuter shelters.

No one project, Postlewaite said, is “ever really done.”

Diti Kohli can be reached at diti.kohli@globe.com. Follow her u/ditikohli_.

bostonglobe.com
u/axlekb — 2 months ago