u/fanzyday

WWII veteran Harold Russell won Best Supporting Actor in 1947 for his performance in The Best Years of Our Lives. He was also awarded the honorary for "bringing hope and courage to his fellow veterans through his appearance in The Best Years of Our Lives" at the same ceremony.

It was assumed that he would not win in the competitive category he was nominated for, which is partly why he was awarded the honorary. He ended up winning anyway.

The other nominees: Barbie, Oppenheimer, Killers of the Flower Moon, Napoleon

Until then, the only Irish-born actors to win were for supporting roles: Barry Fitzgerald (Going My Way - 1944), Brenda Fricker (My Left Foot - 1989).

The caveat here is Daniel Day-Lewis. He has a joint citizenship but was born in London.

I've had my iPhone 8+ since 2018. There's damage on both the front and back, the upper half of the screen eventually became unresponsive, and yet I still waited a few more months before finally upgrading. My stubborn self is relieved to have something brand new again.

Out of the three, only EEAAO won Best Picture.

1952 winners: Humphrey Bogart, Vivien Leigh, Karl Madden, Kim Hunter

1977 winners: Peter Finch, Faye Dunaway, Jason Robards, Beatrice Straight

2023 winners: Brendan Fraser, Michelle Yeoh, Ke Huy Quan, Jamie Lee Curtis

I highly doubt we'll ever see 4/4 acting wins from the same movie...

Save the click:

Taylor Swift has spent years fighting for artists — first over streaming economics, then over ownership rights. One of the most consequential clauses she ever negotiated is now paying off.

The "Spotify deal" Swift secured as part of her 2018 contract with Universal Music Group (UMG) is coming through, according to the singer's team, triggering payouts to artists tied to profits from UMG's sale of its Spotify shares.

When Swift signed with UMG's Republic Records after leaving Big Machine Records in November 2018, she made one condition non-negotiable.

"As part of my new contract with Universal Music Group, I asked that any sale of their Spotify shares result in a distribution of money to their artists, non-recoupable," she posted back then in a handwritten-style note on her social media channels.

That final word — "non-recoupable" — is what makes the provision so significant.

In standard recording contracts, many artists are considered "unrecouped," meaning they have yet to pay back advances, recording budgets and other label expenses. In many cases, additional income streams are applied toward those balances instead of being paid directly.

Swift's clause prevents that.

By requiring Spotify equity proceeds to be distributed on a non-recoupable basis, the agreement ensures artists receive actual payouts regardless of whether they still owe money to the label. The funds cannot be used to offset existing balances. As UMG prepares to sell roughly half of its stake in Spotify, according to the company's first quarter earnings report in April 2026, artists will benefit from that deal.

This development is the latest chapter in Swift's evolving relationship with Spotify and the broader music industry.

She famously pulled her catalog from Spotify in 2014, criticizing low payouts and the impact of free, ad-supported tiers. In 2015, she publicly challenged Apple Music over its decision not to pay artists during free trial periods, prompting the company to reverse course within days. By 2017, she returned her catalog to Spotify as streaming became the industry's dominant force.

The once-rocky relationship has since transformed into one of the platform's biggest success stories. On April 23, 2026, Spotify named Taylor Swift its most globally streamed artist of all time as part of the platform's 20th anniversary celebration. She was also Spotify's Global Top Artist in both 2023 and 2024.

Her advocacy has extended beyond streaming and into ownership. On May 29, 2025, Swift published an almost 700-word letter announcing she had finally regained control of her first six master recordings. The singer-songwriter reflected on the broader industry impact of her yearslong fight.

"I'm extremely heartened by the conversations this saga reignited within my industry among artists and fans," she said. "Every time a new artist tells me they negotiated to own their master recordings in their record contract because of this fight, I'm reminded of how important it was for all of this to happen."