u/honkballs

Literally 20 minutes ago I was selecting between Medium, High, Very High etc, and now back to Instant and Thinking?

All this changing is really frustrating, I had just spend the last 2 days re running a whole bunch of tests to see which level of the "new" thinking levels were best for what I needed... but now, just after I've updated all my prompts and scripts to work, poof, gone again... sigh.

And Saylor will continue raising the interest rate every month until the price is above $99.

It also means he can't really issue more STRC (as who would buy it at $100 when they can buy it for less on the open market). Which was his main way of funding new bitcoin purchases now, as issuing new common stock would start ruining his "bitcoin yield" metric.

The cracks are starting to show.

"I'm sure you are feeling the same as me if you truly understand Bitcoin."

This is the top post on rBitcoin now, title as well... they really do have an excuse or narrative for everything.

Bitcoin staying flat / going down all year when inflation and stocks continue to rip? Yes tell us why this is a good thing.

I'm sure that's why everyone buys bitcoin, to see their "investment" decline in value... whilst their boomer parents make 10%+ returns in a a boring index fund.

Few understand I guess.

I thought the limit was a rolling 50 images per 3 hours....

But it's just told me to wait 15 hours to generate more (I'm on Plus)

And just to make it worse, my last generation was 3 images... and I got hit with a "We’re so sorry, but the prompt may violate our content policies. If you think we got it wrong, please retry or edit your prompt." which used up the last of my limits!!

This response is doing my head in.

I'm using prompts it wrote for me, on images it's made me... yet half the time it's coming back with this.

I ask why, it comes up with some BS about certain words "triggering" things, then suggests a new prompt, maybe that works, maybe it doesn't... I try the prompt that worked last time again, the "super safe prompt that will work" and then I get this error again.

It's so inconsistent and wasting so much time.

I can't wait for Seedream to bring out a new model that rivals chatgpt images... seedream never gives me pushback. Censorship is ruining American models.

I watch some pretty niche sport events, where I have no legal way of watching them in my country so I have to rely on those sketchy sports streaming sites.

I don't see anything morally wrong with this, I literally can't watch it "legally" even if I paid...

Grok used to be great for this, would tell me sites to try (normally it just pulls them from reddit, but it's much quicker for that to do it that me going trawling through it all).

But now it tells me that it's copyright content and "bad" and there's no way I can word it or try to moralize it, it won't do it.

It's so ironic an LLM trying to lecture me about copyright when it's whole existence is from stealing copyrighted material.

Has anyone else found this? The more I edit a person, the more they get some orange glow tan.

I have a pasty white English person and after a few prompts they are looking more Latino.

It's like they are all drifting towards Trump's skin colour.

I've tried prompting to keep original skin tone / complexion, or even adding in to change it to pale, but then I just get different skin.

Anyone got any key phrases I can try adding in to help?

Literally in the thinking it says things like "Confirming consistency for the next batch of images The anchor is slightly more tan than expected, but it should be okay." Like no, it's not ok, I don't want everyone looking like Umpa Lumpas!!