Doesn’t this look kinda similar to Womb Profusion (design-wise)?

Doesn’t this look kinda similar to Womb Profusion (design-wise)?

Like, I know it was NOT womb profusion here but it looks so similar to when kenjaku used WP. I think Gege definitely based Womb Profusion on this mass here.

People who say “Geto didn’t have a domain” confuse me because what are you saying that based on? Gojo wasn’t shown having a domain in JJK0 or HI, but that doesn’t mean he didn’t have it in JJK0, it just wasn’t a concept at the time. And he evidently unlocked it after the events of HI. The same could be the case for Geto.

“Why didn’t Geto use DE in JJK0 then?” Why didn’t Gojo? He probably didn’t feel the need to (narratively). Similarly, Geto could’ve felt that he didn’t need to use DE against anyone in the movie, and thought that Maximum Uzumaki was a better-suited attack against Yuta/Rika.

u/kookiekoo — 1 day ago

How much would I have to add to a signed red play.com slipcase for a signed rep 8x10?

I really do want to complete my signed Taylor collection and I don’t need two signed red slipcases but I also can’t afford to buy a signed reputation outright 🥲 I’m just thinking of trading one of my signed red slipcases instead. I’ve been told that the red slipcase was a UK exclusive, limited to 500 copies only. So I’m wondering now if a signed rep poster is a fair trade for a signed red slipcase?

reddit.com
u/kookiekoo — 1 month ago

Congratulations to the cast and crew of Taylor Swift | The Eras Tour | The Final Show for their 5 Emmy® nominations including Outstanding Variety Special (Pre-Recorded).

(Official Disney+ Social Media Post)

u/kookiekoo — 1 month ago

Is a signed Red play.com a fair trade for a signed debut?

I have no hopes of getting a signed 1989 or rep but is a signed debut possible if I have an extra signed red slipcase from play.com?

reddit.com
u/kookiekoo — 2 months ago

Taylor Swift’s Courtside Seat from Knicks-Cavaliers Playoff Game Sells at Auction for $7,000

The courtside seat that Taylor Swift sat in at the Cavaliers' arena sold for a hefty price.

Memorabilia company The Realest and the Cleveland Cavaliers auctioned off the seat Swift, 36, sat in, as well as the one used by her fiancé Travis Kelce during Game 3 of the Cavaliers' Eastern Conference Finals series against the New York Knicks.

According to The Athletic, Swift's seat sold for $7,000 on Sunday, June 14 while Kelce's went for $1,405. The Cavaliers also auctioned off the seats used by by Timothée Chalamet and Kylie Jenner during Game 4. Chalamet's sold for $1,202 and a buyer shelled out $1,505 for Jenner's. The Cavs also sold actor Ben Stiller's Game 4 chair for $732 and rapper Machine Gun Kelly's for $635.

people.com
u/kookiekoo — 2 months ago

Taylor Swift on the red carpet ahead of being inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame ❤️

u/kookiekoo — 2 months ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 7.0k r/TaylorSwift

Taylor Swift sings her latest single and “You Got A Friend in Me” with Randy Newman at the Toy Story 5 premiere (full performance)

u/kookiekoo — 2 months ago

Official Single Cover for Taylor Swift’s “I Knew It, I Knew You”. Out this Friday!

u/kookiekoo — 3 months ago

‘Toy Story’ or Tay Story? Easter Eggs in New Billboard Campaign Heighten Fans’ Belief That Taylor Swift Is Involved in Pixar Sequel

STC:

Taylor Swift fans have been hoping that Disney/Pixar will “just say yes” when it comes to confirming longstanding rumors that the pop superstar is involved in some way with “Toy Story 5.” That’s not happening… yet. But anticipation over the possibility was further piqued Friday, with the unveiling of billboards that any reasonable person would suspect either (a) point toward a coming announcement of Swift being a part of the movie or (b) will get the company crucified by Swifties if it should all turn out to be a faux tease.
The billboards feature the giant letters “TS,” which happens to be an acronym for both Swift’s name and the film franchise, obviously. Although “Toy Story” movies have never been boiled down to two letters before, there’s a first time for everything, so there is plausible deniability in a connection there.

But then there are 13 cartoon clouds on the billboards… which holds true both for horizontal and vertical variants of the advertising. With that employment of the singer’s favorite number in the new ad campaign, any deniability would no longer be very plausible.
Of course, no one is denying anything right now. Reps for both Disney and Swift had no comment when asked about the billboards Friday.

What her involvement might be is still open to rampant speculation. It could be a speaking voice role in the cast; it could be a song embedded in the body of the film that is written or co-written and/or sung by Swift. But thinking outside the toybox may be advised. For all that anyone outside the cone of silence knows, it could be a live, picture-in-picture simulcast of Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding embedded into opening-night screenings.
There is only one thing that it’s certain it *won’t* be: Swift doing an end-titles theme. Producers strictly ruled that out during an oft-cited interview this past week, although they were peculiarly specific about exactly what it was they were denying.

variety.com
u/kookiekoo — 3 months ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 8.2k r/popculturechat

Paul McCartney reveals that Taylor Swift, Sabrina Carpenter, Billie Eilish, and Olivia Rodrigo were at his house for a party organized by his wife and daughter Stella

u/kookiekoo — 3 months ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 6.8k r/popculturechat

Elsie Hewitt confirms that Pete Davidson is a deadbeat father, five months after welcoming their daughter

u/kookiekoo — 3 months ago
▲ 724 r/powerpopgirls+1 crossposts

Universal Music Group confirmed Wednesday that it would be selling half of its 3 percent stake in Spotify — a deal worth as much as $1.4 billion based on the streaming service’s valuation as of April 29 — and thanks in part to Taylor Swift, all of UMG’s roster of artists stand to be cashing in too.

How Swift has anything to do with this windfall is a bit complicated, and goes all the way back to the major record labels’ original licensing agreements with Spotify from the late 2000s, which got the companies stock in the then-fledgling streaming service. Credit where it’s due, as Music Business Worldwide reported back in 2016, with no legal requirement to do so, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group had both committed to doling out some of the profits to the artists if they sold their Spotify stock. UMG confirmed* *it’d do the same nearly two years later, about a month before Spotify’s IPO.

Taylor gets more crucial here in the specifics. Sony sold first, selling off a portion of its Spotify stock after the IPO in April in 2018. Warner did the same a few months later, selling the company’s entire Spotify stake. But the two music companies’ methods of payment had a significant difference. When Sony paid out, it ignored whether or not an artist is recouped, meaning that Sony acts got paid regardless on if they owed the label money on their record deal. Warner, however, kept recoupments in consideration, so the label kept more of the profit.

The same year, Swift was negotiating her deal to join the world’s biggest music company. During that process, while UMG had already committed to paying out artists on Spotify stock sales, Swift asked UMG to commit that the deal would be non-recoupable. It was a particularly shrewd move on her part that guaranteed a better deal for thousands of more artists around her as well, and the sort of move only an artist of her stature could make a reality.

u/Complex_Narwhal_8924 — 4 months ago