is AI Art a result of consumerism?
most artists (especially AI "artists") will tell you that you've missed the point of art when you try to define it. that you don't understand what art is. rather than defining art, i'd like to share my opinion on what art is about.
i believe art is about the human expression of raw emotion, the desire for connection, and the human experience as a whole (and there are art forms, like Dada, which reject some of these principles). although AI image gen models are trained almost exclusively on human-generated artwork, they are still complex mathematical formulae and billions to trillions of parameters.
AI does not possess subjective experience or emotional stakes in its creations, nor does it understand the complexity of the human condition. art is just as much about the process as it is the product. i feel that AI abstracts away that process, distancing the creator from the emotion, labor, and intention behind the work. it cuts straight to the product. every time you type in an iteration prompt, it is taking that product and feeding on itself. it uses images used from artists (often without their consent) as direct samples rather than inspiration.
consumerism is about the constant acquisition of products for the ultimate goal of achieving happiness and fulfillment. like consumer culture, AI art prioritizes the rapid generation of finished products over engagement with process, craft, or reflection. every AI model attempts to spit out a finished result. a product. and the "prompt iterations" of AI artists are taking that product and trying to create a process out of it, rather than letting it naturally be part of the process itself.
i don't think that my opinion is "romanticizing struggle," as i've seen many AI art proponents argue. rather i believe that art should be based on real human experience or using uniquely human talent in the process to create a true work of art.