Login

u/nutraxfornerves

r/bestoflegaladvice r/ThornTree r/Woodland r/amibeingdetained r/seriouseats r/Sacramento r/Blooddonors r/sovcitizen r/Sovereigncitizen r/Qult_Headquarters r/legaladvice
▲ 58 r/Sovereigncitizen

BJW’s latest money-making idea for white people who are not US Citizens—make and sell firearms to other non-citizens, with zero regulation or oversight

>I’m just have zero qualms of being shut out of our current economy. None of it is for us anyways, it's for US citizens.

>We need to completely rebuild each and every sector of the economy from scratch.

>You may look at that as a problem... i look at it as an opportunity.

>Any plumber, handyman or other tradesman has the opportunity to carve out their piece of the pie. This is the Oregon Trail all over again. Endless opportunity. And all completely tax and oversight free.

>You could start a car company and you would have zero oversight by the EPA or other "regulation" US citizens.

>You could manufacture guns and sell them to State citizens (this is actually probably one of the most lucrative options). You would not need serial numbers or any contact with the ATF or other US citizens.

>You say: "oh but what about interstate commerce!" Ok well sort that out in the courts but, in the meanwhile, they can't stop you from doing it. And also keep in mind that they can only REGULATE commerce.

>The reason the commerce clause has gotten out of hand is not because of the commerce clause, it's because of the 14th Amendment citizenship class. They PRETEND as though they have expanded their powers through the commerce clause but no, their powers expanded because THEY NO LONGER NEED THE COMMERCE CLAUSE WHEN DEALING WITH THEIR OWN CONGRESSIONAL CITIZENS.

This is the real truth of the matter.

reddit.com
u/nutraxfornerves — 23 days ago
▲ 49 r/amibeingdetained+1 crossposts

"Lies, Damned Lies, and Sovcits: Perspectives on Pseudolaw in New Zealand" by William Biss - thesis analysis on New Zealand pseudolaw with 267 judgments

New Zealand has its first broad survey of pseudolaw caselaw in MA thesis by William Biss.

Biss identifies & surveys 267 NZ court judgments that involve pseudolaw, plotting a progressive increase over the past decade. Notably, half involve a NZ Maori-specific/linked conceptual base that Biss describes as a novel local adaptation of pseudolaws' more common general structure.

Biss also uses interviews and law enforcement reports to evaluate the NZ pseudolaw ecosystem, including:

  • the role of the COVID-19 pandemic in the propagation of these ideas
  • the source populations for these claims (lower income/economic status)
  • the absence of leading guru figures, or rather the proliferation of numerous micro-gurus with small to negligible follower bases
  • employment of Indigenous arguments that are incoherent to the developed law in NZ
  • the limited record of violence from pseudolaw adherent populations, but deep personal disassociation from state and social norms
  • that Australian and NZ pseudolaw are following different patterns, at least partially attributable to the different (not)-legal reasoning in the two jurisdictions

There's good stuff here written by an investigator who has been musing about both what is going on nationally, and in other jurisdictions.

Looking forward to more digging by the author and other NZ investigators.

hdl.handle.net
u/DNetolitzky — 23 days ago
▲ 702 r/Sovereigncitizen

Florida ‘Sovereign citizen’ convicted of harassing judges with fraudulent $50 million claim against their property. Mandatory minimum sentence is 10 years; could get up to 90.

sa18.org
u/nutraxfornerves — 1 month ago
▲ 69 r/Sovereigncitizen

BJW’s latest Federal lawsuit against Glendale. City filed motion for dismissal; BJW disagrees & says he will keep litigating until he gats his way. Hearing Sept. 30.

[BJW is a SovCit guru who fancies himself the world's greatest legal scholar. He lives in Glendale, California, and is mad at the city for not letting him use that sooper seekrit Treasury account to pay his utility bills. He had one Federal suit dismissed; lost in small claims court; and is about to have a state court suit dismissed.]

BJW filed another Federal suit against Glendal last July. This is the one where there are two plaintiffs: Brandon Joe Williams, white citizen of California, and BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS^®, US citizen. The plaintiffs demand separate jury trials.

The attorney for Glendale (whom BJW has accused of perjury and treason) has asked for the suit to be dismissed.

>Defendant CITY OF GLENDALE (“City”), will and hereby does move this Court to dismiss the Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted on the following grounds: 1) The entire Complaint is barred by the doctrines of res judicata/collateral estoppel; and 2) None of the claims for relief in the Complaint are supported by the factual allegations in the Complaint. [Grounds #1 is basically “We’ve already gone over all this in a couple of other suits that he lost. There’s no reason to do it again.”]

BJW responded with a complete rehash of why lower case is a white citizen of California and uppercase is a US citizen. And, Glendale does too have to accept my negotiable instruments. Plus, we haven’t gone over all this on account of because it keeps getting dismissed and nobody lets me have a conversation about it in court. A few quotes:

>[City Attorney] Arias is just glibly parroting off various banal statements without any real substance. This should not be​ ​considered a defense. Ignorance is not a defense and you can tell from Mr. Arias’ motion that he has not​ even the slightest clue what money is.…

> ​These claims have never had any meaningful conversation​​ or clarity. It is hereby requested that​ the Motion to Dismiss be denied so that we can actually have a real conversation on the merits of the​ complaint…

>Frankly, the Plaintiffs feel as though they have been railroaded. Plaintiffs followed the rules of​ the original small claims case by ensuring that they had proper damages to establish proper causes of​ action before bringing back the claims and Plaintiffs were shut out, procedurally, instead of gaining​ clarity and justice. Now, it appears as though the Defendant has gotten de facto immunity for all financial causes of action from this point into the infinite future because, by the logic of the State​ Court’s decision, that original decision in case B (small claims) is essentially barring Plaintiffs from any​ future claims on entirely separate negotiable instrument damages. That is simply wrong and the​ Plaintiffs will appeal that case and, if this Court also believes that way, Plaintiffs will be appealing to the​ 119th Circuit for relief. That is simply false and unacceptable… a travesty of justice. Plaintiffs need clarity​ on the issues brought in the complaint and there has been almost zero clarity achieved to this point.​ Without clarity achieved by speaking coherently on the subjects brought in the complaint, the issues will​ continue onward forever without resolution.​ ​

reddit.com
u/nutraxfornerves — 1 month ago
▲ 166 r/amibeingdetained+1 crossposts

Alberta lawyer Grace Akpan is professionally sanctioned for notarizing pseudolaw documents

(That is not a legitimate legal identification document but a pseudolaw forgery - see R v Ayyazi, 2022 ABQB 412.)

Something weird about lawyers. You put a document with big ink and/or blood fingerprints on it, postage stamps with cryptic codes, and a signature line that reads UCC 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED!

And you ask the lawyer to notarize it.

A surprising number say Okey Dokey!

This makes me crazy. I’ve seen this hundreds of times. Documents with duplicate names in different cases and colours. Documents that purport to be contacts between BILL SMITH and Bill Smith. Documents invoking bible passages as law. Documents that are called “Notary Judgments”, and that if you read ‘em, purport to be binding supra-court decisions.

Documents that threaten law enforcement, court staff, judges. Documents that purport to create a licence to kill.

Okey Dokey!!! Okey Dokey!!!

Do I seem pissed off? I’m pissed off. If there is a profession on the planet that ought to have an internal checkbox that I maybe should scan something before I slap my signature on it and seal it with a magic stamp? It’s lawyers.

But they #^&@# keep notarizing the F’ing things.

I’m posting about a lawyer in Alberta who finally got a professional sanction for doing this. Her name is Grace Akpan, of Calgary. Her activities led to a string of court judgments and now, finally, a disciplinary outcome.

Akpan notarized documents purporting to unilaterally terminate a drug prosecution. Drug trafficker and illegal handgun owner sends them to the Alberta Court of King’s Bench threatening court staff. The ABKB (ACJ John Rooke) reacts negatively and fines Akpan:

The Alberta Court of Appeal overturns the sanction on the basis of procedural (un)fairness. Goes back to the ABKB: Akpan (Re), 2024 ABCA 232

ABKB (ACJ Blair Nixon – Rooke is now retired) does it over and again fines Akpan:

Back to the ABCA, where the Court says yes, Akpan did a bad lawyer thingie. But courts shouldn’t sanction lawyers for bad lawyer thingies. That’s up to the Law Society of Alberta: Akpan (Re), 2025 ABCA 47

Now, throughout all this Akpan takes the position that she never did anything wrong. She was acting as a notary. She witnessed someone sign a document. She looked at the dude’s (fake) ID, checked the name signed, looked at the picture on the (fake) ID, and it’s the dude. That ends it. Notaries witness signatures. And anyways, she’s never heard of Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments or OPCA. Can’t mean anything.

The various court decisions all agree that Akpan in doing that ignored three things.

  1. Notaries in Alberta have professional obligations to not endorse or validate fraudulent documents, and pseudolaw documents are fraudulent documents. That’s a duty imposed by the Alberta government.
  2. Both the Alberta trial and appeal courts have instructed lawyers should never notarize or formalize pseudolaw documents. What is a pseudolaw document? That is detailed in the Meads v Meads, 2012 ABKB 571 decision
  3. The Law Society of Alberta has explicitly instructed its members on multiple occasions to not notarize pseudolaw documents.

I am pleased to report that the Law Society of Alberta has concluded a disciplinary process in response to Akpan’s activities, and suspended her for one month for having brought the administration of justice into disrepute. That’s actually a pretty strong sanction for something like this. Here are the decisions:

Akpan’s arguments in the disciplinary proceedings did not benefit her. Her position continued to be she did nothing wrong. Akpan admitted she had received notification from the Law Society of Alberta not to notarize pseudolaw documents, and that pointed to where there was information about how to identify those materials. Akpan argued what she notarized wasn’t unusual. She acknowledged the drug trafficker’s documents targeted the court as a “complaint”. That’s fine. People should be allowed to “complain” to and about courts.

Akpan said she is not a litigator. Therefore, she did not have to read the Law Society’s warnings about pseudolaw documents.

Akpan rejected that OPCA/pseudolaw documents are something that she knew about then or currently. The LSA decision quotes her exact words. They’re worth reproducing:

>Like I said in my testimony yesterday, as at the time, I was not familiar. And, even today, I may not be familiar with this concept because it's not written in any book to say, okay, look at it. This is how it looks. This is what they say. Even document, in my understanding, is untrue, is false, is this, and that. I acknowledge what I'm going through. But if I see it -- a -- an OPCA document, I may unlikely recognize it because it's a difficult task. That's just what I'm saying. It's a difficult task. It's a concept that not everybody is aware of it.

Now, I note that Canada has the most extensive corpus of court case law detailing the nature and substance of pseudolaw arguments, and what the relevant documents and materials look like.

There is also a large volume of Canadian academic writing on the subject, most of it by yours truly. I even wrote a paper cautioning lawyers to please not notarize pseudolaw documents. Akpan is practicing in the province where there is a literal textbook on pseudolaw pretending to be a court judgment. Some people even report to me that it’s kind of fun to read!

Akpan concluded she did nothing wrong. In fact, she’s the victim. So many lawyers notarize pseudolaw documents (and that’s true!) that she here is the subject of unfair treatment. She has been targeted. That is bias and discrimination. I note here that Akpan is of Nigerian origin and was trained as a lawyer in that jurisdiction. That allegation was rejected by the Law Society. If she did something wrong, then Akpan’s position is that the only punishment she should receive is an instruction to get educated.

The Law Society concluded Akpan’s misconduct was serious, she defied court and Law Society instructions, and her continued rejection of pseudolaw as a category of problematic conduct warranted a month suspension, mandatory education, and $7,000 in costs.

This is a step in the right direction, in my opinion. That’s a meaningful sanction. Hopefully lawyers in Alberta and Canada will take note. What doesn’t get stressed in the Law Society’s analysis is the dangerous aspect of notarizing pseudolaw documents which is specific to Canada (though I’m aware the same motif is now appearing in the U.K.).

There’s a myth that was invented by the founder of the Freeman-on-the-Land movement Robert Menard that notaries are in fact super-judges, who possess the highest legal authority. Pseudolaw types in Canada frequently use the “Three/Five Letters” process to create what is purportedly a binding judgment, the notary being the "super-judge" who endorses the last document. And that (supposedly) overrides all court and state authority. You can naturally see why that makes notary services very, very popular in Canadian pseudolaw circles.

The documents Akpan witnessed include claims of authority by the drug trafficker to use force to respond to law enforcement and Crown Prosecutor activities. They are outlaws. While it’s not explored anywhere in any detail in the disciplinary or court records, Akpan’s client looks to be a Moorish Law affiliate, a pseudolaw movement linked to organized gangs, drug trafficking, and violent crime.

Now I’m waiting to see if Canada’s lawyer education organizations track me down, since I’m Canada’s subject expert on this stuff. I think I’ll strip-mine Monty Python’s “How to Recognize Different Types of Trees From Quite a Long Ways Away” format.

(Actually that’s quite a valid approach. Strawman Theory motifs are the easy give away that should lead anyone to say “Do Not Touch”.)

(Ok, blood on paperwork should probably also count.)

u/DNetolitzky — 2 months ago
▲ 72 r/Sovereigncitizen

BJW explains why he has “never truly lost” any of his cases

Posted on his Facebook page.

>The reason why i can never lose is because you can never break my spirit. Because i have the spirit of an American.

>If i never give up, i never truly lose. This is how i sustain the court defeats that i do.

>To me I've never truly lost. I've simply learned valuable lessons that advance my skills into the next case.

>When i sued AMEX, they say i supposedly owed them $177k. They have never attempted to collect on that and we have a currently active appeal in the 9th Circuit that i am awaiting to move to the next step with (which I'm hoping is oral argument).

>The SBA case i lost, then i lost the appeal, then my writ of certiorari was denied. I "allegedly" owe them $198k. You don't see anyone knocking on my door attempting to collect that.

>Less than 1% of all attorneys ever file a writ of certiorari into the US Supreme Court in their entire careers. My first time up to bat was decent, but now i have enough info to do a full timeline breakdown, with exact case law, to prove the birth of the 14th Amendment class.

>I just lost my City of Glendale case to a demurrer. Some people clap in joy. To me, all i see is an opportunity to learn my State appellate process and possibly the Supreme Court process.

>I'm well on my way to being able to comfortably operate in Federal and State courts, appeals and the various Supreme Courts. The percentage of lawyers that can do that is probably less than a tenth of a percent.

>You may say "well yeah but they can win cases." Fine, but I'm sure if i wanted to ride the elevator down 700 floors and file something like a personal injury case, i could probably win pretty easily. Or i could do a credit repair case with Joey Kimbrough and probably win one of those very easily. I know that.

>So why do i torture myself?

>You see me sue governments and massive corporations and i have never had even a single word of discovery issued on me. I've never been sanctioned. I've never been countersued.

>The reason i torture myself is because getting in the ring with the biggest, nastiest opponents has allowed me to grow at break-neck speeds.

>With zero formal training, i have my own law firm charging top-tier 40-year attorney hourly rates... all within 2.5 years of filing my first case. This is mathematically impossible.

>Oh no it's not. Not when you truly feel the spirit of America and you lunge at the biggest and meanest persons in the room.

>I cannot be charged, i cannot be sanctioned. I cannot be defeated. It is simply more growth each time i fall down. Then i dust myself off, learn, and move forward.

>I'm preparing to move the City of Glendale State case into appeals. I'm taking a little time off before i do but the process is going to be very slow. Once i file the notice of appeal into the case, it will most likely take months before my opening brief will be due. The opening brief will be quite a lot of work... similar to my writ of certiorari.

>I'm more than happy to do it. Because pushing myself this hard is what has allowed me to grow so fast.

>Then, with the new Federal case... if it is somehow dismissed, the 9th Circuit makes it incredibly easy to file an appeal with them. I personally find it amazing how they not only have a simple form for pro se litigants but they also have a very simple and very nice online submission portal. That appeal will be very easy to whip up.

>And so we continue on our journey. A journey that has ONLY ONE EVENTUAL OUTCOME...

>And that outcome is that these government corporations will bow before the law. They will kneel before the commercial codes and they will no longer operate as rogue agencies that believe that they can simply do whatever they want without repercussions.

>They tell us that we must follow the law while they tell us how we can pay and what kinds of notes and drafts we must use.

>They are insane and they are off their leashes. This ends when they respect the law and bow before it. And we will not stop until they do.

reddit.com
u/nutraxfornerves — 2 months ago
▲ 120 r/Blooddonors

I've only been donating for 50 years.

I just discovered this sub. So glad to see it.

In 1975, I went out from my office for lunch and saw a BloodMobile. I dared myself to go in. And that was it. Here are some assorted anecdotes:

Back in the day, it was a three-year deferment if you traveled to a malaria area. I did a lot of travel to really off-the-beaten-track places and fell off the blood bank database. After I finally was able to donate again, I got a letter a couple of days later. I was scared to open it. What did they find?!

When I finally opened it, it said "Welcome new donor!" I called them & said "For heaven's sake, put that on the outside of the envelope!"

I have really good veins. When I was doing whole blood, I used to track my time. My personal best was 4:30. I almost never went over 5 minutes.

Then, they did some additional testing. "You are CMV negative. We'd like you to switch to platelets." So I did. And I go in every three weeks now.

I was wearing a 10-gallon donor shirt when a man in scrubs came up to me in a supermarket. "Have you really donated that much?" "Actually, quite a bit more." "Thank you! I'm a surgeon. Blood is one of the most important things."

A few years later, my spouse had a bleeding ulcer that suddenly blew into an artery. Luckily, it happened while my spouse was hospitalized in ICU. Staff went into crisis mode. Believe me, you do not want to get a call from a hospital social worker saying "You need to return to the hospital NOW." When I got there, my spouse was in surgery and the principal doctor was writing up a report. Well, he was trying to write a report. His hands were shaking so hard, he couldn't write.

The nurses told me that as soon as it happened, the doctor turned to ice. Delivering clear, concise orders. And, of course, many orders were for blood. One nurse described how she sat under my spouse's bed, squeezing bags of blood. He made it, after getting 12 units of blood in less than 24 hours.

All in all, a dozen people saved his life by being blood donors.

I donate now because it's payback time.

Bad experiences?

I had donated a double units of platelets. That afternoon, I stupidly didn't use the guard on a mandolin slicer. I wrapped up my finger & headed for the ER. Problem was, since I was so low on platelets, my blood wouldn't clot. By the time I checked in, blood was running down my arm. That got me seen immediately. The doctor had to put a tourniquet on my finger in order to stitch me up.

Another time, just as the nurse was inserting the needle, the guy next to me fainted and someone called her name.She whipped the needle through the vein. I wound up with a golfball-sized hematoma.

And I still donate. Twelve people saved my spouse's life. I can never repay that enough.

My blood bank recently offered a customized T-shirt. "I donate for [insert reason here]." I got one honoring my spouse.

When I talk to people abut donating, I talk about whole blood. "What else can you do that takes about an hour, has a whole bunch of people constantly telling you how wonderful you are, gets your free food, and—when you leave, you flat out know you saved someone's life."

reddit.com
u/nutraxfornerves — 2 months ago
▲ 58 r/Sovereigncitizen

BJW updates his court cases

>Small claims case was dismissed. No reasoning given orally during the hearing and none given in final order.

>My State case with Mr. Tavelman is also about to be dismissed, but i had an amazing conversation with the Judge in preparation for appeals.

>I do believe I'm going to be able to get an audio file for the small claims case as well as a written transcript for this morning's hearing.

>It was amazing and I'm very excited to move forward with the appeal and then also with the new Federal case. Both the State case and the Federal case will go to their respective Supreme Courts, as needed, to get the City of Glendale to comply with the laws regarding notes and drafts.

reddit.com
u/nutraxfornerves — 2 months ago
▲ 60 r/amibeingdetained+1 crossposts

Your professional court-related needs are now satisfied - The Erwin Rommel School of Law is back!

Pseudolaw “law schools” always intrigue me. Why would you trust an "institution" that places itself outside the legal norms?

Awhile ago my favourite, the "Erwin Rommel School of Law" which had run since the 1970s disappeared. Yes, that Rommel.

But it's back! Still run by Michael Halsey Brown, though now he has a number of collaborators. Of course, you want to visit.

Why Rommel? “Rommel accomplished more with less than anybody in the 20th century.”

I often used the ERSOL website when conducting educational sessions, it inevitably sent judges howling with laughter. Thus, I was saddened when the ERSOL disappeared offline something like four or five years ago. At that time you could purchase Brown’s entire library of resources, “The Whole Nine Yards”, for a modest $1,499. Well, the price has dropped to a mere $750, all on a convenient USB Flash Drive and “professionally organized”.

I’ve never purchased the package so I can’t comment on the details. It’s a little surprising how Brown’s key materials never ended up on Scribd or other public sites, at least that I noticed. My quick search today did however locate his 1974 text “Iron Claws: Grip Development and Bench Press Course”. No law stuff that after a quick scan. Here you go, you curious ones.

Brown describes himself as a “modern renaissance man”, and an incomplete list of his publications nails the point with a dagger. Where does one start?

  •  “Brown’s Book of Carburetors”
  • “The Case for Polygamy” (oh, look what the alpha male has to say)
  • “The Erwin Rommel School of Law – How to Defeat an Illegal Legal System” (with macramé – duh)
  • “Suppressed Inventions & How They Work” (quietly, they’re suppressed)
  • “Sex, Money and Power: The Bible Shows You How”

Anyways, back to Brown’s pseudolaw texts. Is it incongruous that the cover art for “How to Defeat an Illegal Legal System” illustrates some kind of M4 Sherman? Just saying. You’d think Erwin would prefer a Panther.

Or a StuG. More than a little partial to those, myself. Nasty functional looking things.

u/DNetolitzky — 2 months ago
▲ 57 r/Sovereigncitizen

BJW has a new template you can use to pay your bills with a promissory note (negotiable instrument).

Template

The promissory note is being issued by your all-caps strawman, who is an artificial person and citizen of the US. Your lower-case name, a white citizen of your state, is merely acting as the agent for the strawman. The creditor supposedly can take the letter to the bank and trade it to them for money. The bank then collects from the Federal Reserve. Or something like that.

The template also says that if you the creditor refuse to accept the note, you will be sued. BJW has already said that’s his plan. Each time Glendale sends a utility bill, he will send this letter. Then, if the City refuses to accept it, it’s off to court again.

P.S. still nothing from him about the Aug. 10 court hearing.

reddit.com
u/nutraxfornerves — 2 months ago
▲ 25 r/Qult_Headquarters

Current wildfires aren’t being caused by Jewish space lasers. It’s helicopters.

From a Facebook post by a devoted follower of Queen Romana. Her Royal Majesty has maintained for years that wildfires are deliberately caused by the Bad Guys.

There was a tragic crash of a firefighting helicopter in Utah. It’s the kind that sucks up water from a lake or river. See photo in this story

She posted a photo on her FB page with this comment:

>What kind of chopper does this look like to you??!! It sure does NOT look like it would carry much water but it could gasoline!

u/nutraxfornerves — 2 months ago