u/sameer_gwasikoti

I’ve been going down a pretty deep rabbit hole lately on near-death experiences, consciousness, and what all of this might actually mean, and I wanted to put my own thoughts down somewhere.

It started with NDEs. The more cases I read, the harder it became to just dismiss them as “dying brain hallucinations.” People accurately describing conversations, surgical tools, and events that happened while they were clinically dead or under full anesthesia… some of them even from a vantage point above the room. Bruce Greyson has spent almost 50 years studying this stuff, and his conclusion isn’t “this proves the afterlife,” but something more careful and honestly more interesting: these experiences challenge the idea that the mind is purely a product of the brain. When the brain is severely compromised or offline, consciousness sometimes seems clearer, not weaker. That stuck with me.

Then I looked at Ian Stevenson’s work on children who remember previous lives – detailed, verifiable memories, and in many cases birthmarks that match the fatal wounds of the person they claim to have been. Again, not “proof,” but a large body of carefully documented cases that are extremely difficult to explain with the standard materialist model.

At some point I started noticing how closely this lines up with what Ashtavakra and Ramana Maharshi were saying centuries ago. Both of them basically taught that you are not the body or the mind – you are pure awareness, and the body is just a temporary instrument. Ramana’s whole method was simply to ask “Who am I?” until the identification with the body-mind collapses. Ashtavakra is even more direct: you were never the limited person you think you are.

The question that kept bothering me was: if consciousness can see, hear, understand, and remember without the brain (as NDEs and some of Stevenson’s cases suggest), then why do we even need a body, senses, and a mind?

The best framing I’ve found so far is the “filter” idea. The brain doesn’t generate consciousness so much as it narrows it – making it usable for survival in a physical world. When that filter weakens (in NDEs, deep meditation, or at death), awareness expands. The body and senses aren’t the source of consciousness; they’re the tools that let pure awareness play in this dense, limited environment for a while.

When I put Greyson, Stevenson, Ashtavakra, and Ramana side by side, they start feeling like different languages pointing at the same thing:

- Consciousness is more fundamental than the body.

- The body is temporary.

- Something essential continues (or at least can continue) beyond one lifetime.

- The “higher” or pure consciousness isn’t something we achieve – it’s what remains when the false identification with body and mind drops away.

I’m not saying I’ve figured it out. I’m still very much in the “I don’t know, but this is fascinating” stage. The scientific side gives me data that’s hard to ignore. The Advaita side gives me a coherent philosophical framework that somehow doesn’t contradict the data. And the personal side just leaves me quieter than before.

Has anyone else here gone down a similar mix of NDE research + reincarnation cases + Advaita/Ramana and felt the same strange sense of coherence? Or do you think I’m connecting dots that don’t actually connect?

I've been thinking about the 2027 Uttarakhand elections, and one question keeps bothering me.

Why does every election become about party loyalty, religion, caste, or attacking the opposition, while the issues we deal with every single day barely get serious attention?

People in Uttarakhand aren't asking for miracles.

We want better roads that don't get washed away every monsoon. Hospitals where people don't have to travel hundreds of kilometres for treatment. Jobs so young people don't have to leave the state. Clean tourist towns instead of garbage everywhere. Reliable drinking water, better public transport, forest fire prevention, and government offices where work gets done without unnecessary delays.

None of these problems are impossible to improve in 4-5 years if there is genuine intent and accountability.

So why don't we, as voters, demand measurable promises instead of emotional speeches?

Imagine if every candidate had to publicly commit to things like:

Road quality targets

Number of doctors recruited

Reduction in corruption complaints

Employment generation

Waste management improvements

Quarterly public progress reports

And if they failed without valid reasons, people simply voted them out next time.

Why don't we make accountability the biggest election issue?

I'm not supporting or opposing any political party here. I genuinely want to understand why we rarely vote based on governance and measurable performance.

Do you think voters are ready for this kind of politics, or are we still too divided by identity and party loyalty? I'd love to hear different perspectives.

I've noticed something interesting about myself.

​

When I read or reflect on Advaita Vedanta, my feelings of loneliness often reduce significantly. The idea that consciousness is fundamentally one, and that I'm not really a separate isolated self, brings a sense of peace. It feels like there is something deeper to rely on than constantly seeking companionship from other people.

​

For a while, that perspective genuinely helps. I feel content being alone and less desperate for connection.

​

But then I go back into everyday life and see friends laughing together, couples sharing experiences, families bonding, or just people enjoying great company. And suddenly something shifts inside me.

​

It's not that I stop believing in the philosophy. It's more that seeing human connection in action makes me question whether I'm using spirituality to transcend loneliness or simply to cope with it.

​

Part of me feels that true contentment shouldn't depend on having people around. Another part of me sees how much joy and fulfillment people get from close relationships and wonders if I'm missing something important.

​

I'm curious whether anyone else has experienced this tension between spiritual non-duality and the very human desire for companionship.

​

How do you reconcile feeling complete in yourself while still wanting meaningful connection with others?

​

​

Back in 2017, I was working from home and spending almost my entire day in front of a laptop. Long hours of sitting became my routine.

After a few months, I started feeling pain in my lower back.

At first, I ignored it. Like most people, I thought it was just a temporary issue that would heal on its own. But instead of getting better, it kept getting worse.

I decided to take complete rest for a few days. Surprisingly, the pain didn't improve. In fact, it seemed to be getting stronger.

I visited a local hospital and took medicines for a week, but there was no meaningful improvement.

After that, I decided to go to AIIMS. I went through the prescribed treatment, medications, and physiotherapy sessions. Again, no significant relief.

Still searching for answers, I visited a highly rated private hospital that specialized in back pain. After scans and examinations, they told me I had a minor disc bulge.

For the next several weeks, I underwent multiple treatments including physiotherapy, heat therapy, wave therapy, exercises, and other procedures.

Nothing worked.

My back pain continued to increase. Sitting became difficult. Working became difficult. Most of my time was spent lying on the bed because that was the only position that felt somewhat bearable.

At that point, I was desperate.

One day, while researching back pain on the internet, I came across a book called Healing Back Pain by John Sarno.

Honestly, I was skeptical. The idea that a book could help with pain that multiple hospitals couldn't fix sounded ridiculous.

But I kept reading people's experiences and eventually decided I had nothing to lose. So I ordered the book.

Something unexpected happened.

While reading it, I started recognizing myself in many of the descriptions. The book talked about how unresolved stress, frustration, anger, family issues, and emotional pressure can sometimes manifest as physical pain.

By the third day of reading, my back pain was almost gone.

Not reduced.

Gone.

I know this sounds unbelievable, and if someone had told me this before my experience, I probably wouldn't have believed it either.

I'm not claiming that all back pain is psychological. Many people have genuine structural issues that require medical treatment.

But in my case, after months of suffering, multiple hospitals, medications, physiotherapy, and a disc bulge diagnosis, the real issue turned out to be something I had completely overlooked: chronic emotional stress.

That experience completely changed the way I think about the connection between the mind and the body.

Has anyone else here had a similar experience with chronic pain that turned out to be stress-related?

I genuinely don't understand this.

We often talk about values, honesty, morality, and culture. But at the same time, corruption seems so deeply normalized that many people don't even see it as wrong anymore.

I've personally seen cases where a girl's family preferred a government employee with a modest official salary simply because he had good "uppar ki kamai" (extra income through corruption). It wasn't treated as a red flag. It was treated as an advantage.

That mindset honestly shocks me.

The problem isn't just corrupt officials. The public has also accepted the system. Need a file cleared faster? Pay money. Want work done despite rules? Pay money. Want to avoid trouble? Pay money.

When both the system and society quietly agree that corruption is normal, how can genuine progress happen?

We often compare ourselves with developed countries, but development isn't only about roads, buildings, or GDP. It's also about trust in institutions and respect for rules.

If corruption is seen as a smart move instead of a moral failure, aren't we creating a society where honesty is punished and dishonesty is rewarded?

Am I the only one who feels this normalization of corruption is one of the biggest obstacles to India's long-term progress?

Lately I've noticed that most conversations around me feel repetitive. People talk about daily routines, gossip, careers, money, trends, and while there's nothing wrong with that, I rarely feel genuinely engaged.

The conversations that excite me are about consciousness, the nature of reality, free will, self-inquiry, philosophy, psychology, spirituality, meaning, and why we are here in the first place.

Sometimes I wonder if I'm looking in the wrong places, because it's becoming harder to find people who enjoy exploring these topics without turning everything into a debate or trying to prove they're right.

For those who have found communities like this, where did you find them? Online groups, local meetups, philosophy clubs, spiritual circles, book groups, or somewhere else?

I'd love to hear how you found people who enjoy going beyond small talk and exploring deeper questions together.

Hi everyone,

I own around 11,000 sq. meters of land in a village of Pithoragarh district, Uttarakhand. The land is located on top of a hill and offers beautiful mountain views, peaceful surroundings, and a lot of potential for tourism-related projects.

I've been thinking seriously about developing it into a homestay, eco-retreat, or nature-based stay experience. The biggest challenge is funding and execution, so I'm looking for a genuine investor or business partner who is interested in building something long-term in the Himalayan region.

I'm open to different partnership models, whether it's investment, profit-sharing, joint venture, or someone who has experience in hospitality and tourism.

If anyone is interested, or knows someone who might be, please feel free to reach out. Happy to share more details, photos, location information, and discuss possibilities.

Thanks for reading.