![Image 1 — [Chopard Alpine Eagle Cadence vs Standard]](https://preview.redd.it/205awwegsath1.jpg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=020c05f3440d7339d7a1f598c1ecc6b263f6ac93)
![Image 2 — [Chopard Alpine Eagle Cadence vs Standard]](https://preview.redd.it/spxlqsegsath1.jpg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b5141afc8f2dd7b9bdca96ab1b116c1a5f0521f4)
[Chopard Alpine Eagle Cadence vs Standard]
I have been smitten with the black dial Alpine Eagle Cadence since I tried it on a few years ago. I’m an owner of the standard blue reference and I’m a big fan of the watch- I love blue, fits well with my style. The problem is, the Cadence is SO much more expensive, and I can’t decide if that price differential makes sense for what is largely almost the same watch. The differences are:
- Full titanium construction
- High beat movement (cool, but I’m not a huge movement guy)
- The clasp has the twin triggers whereas mine is a friction fit.
- The dial on the Cadence is a little cleaner with only the XII Roman numeral as opposed to the III, VI, IX on the standard. I do think the Cadence dial is a bit sleeker.
Any thoughts on this conundrum? Pre-owned examples are like $10k differential. My gut is telling me the price differential doesn’t make sense and that I should stick with the blue and maybe upgrade the clasp.