▲ 1.9k r/Warthunder
The airbase from Nuclear Thunder alone is as big as the biggest Ground Battles maps.
airbase added with cdk.
u/skuva — 2 days ago
▲ 782 r/Warthunder
How many Nuclear Thunders are we getting before they fix this?
u/skuva — 15 days ago
▲ 86 r/WarthunderSim
Gaijin is yet again ignoring Sim in its Battle Rating Changes. Make yourself heard on the forum.
Post your suggestions there, and upvote the ones you agree with. Use the search function to find the Sim related posts.
u/skuva — 20 days ago
▲ 201 r/Warthunder
Evidence nº67124 that Gaijin's Bug Manager team either has no clue how the game works, or act in bad faith to purposefully screw any aspect of the game they don't like/care, like Sim Battles.
Here we see a player stating a very obvious problem with the NCTR feature (that gives the name of the target aircraft) being displayed over the 3D target box, instead of the radar screen, resulting in Sim players not being able to make use of the feature as any 3D hud elements are hidden.
Currently only the Eurofighter and Su-30 have MFD's modeled with such info, while all other 90% of aircraft with NCTR have to just suck it. The solution to the problem could be a simple String Text with the name of the target aircraft added to the Radar hud.
The report on the post: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/t059ItKUKXjH
You can find other similar reports, some specifying aircraft, all of them with the same fate.
EDIT: It appear some commenters have the reading comprehension of a Bug Reporting Manager.
The player on the report is not reporting a specific aircraft. They are pointing out how the feature doesn't work on Simulator Battles and why. Giving one aircraft as example and 2 possible solutions:
- either go to the length of researching how each and every aircraft particularly displays contacts on its screens. Which is impossible for most modern aircraft for obvious classified reasons.
or
- going the obvious simple route of adding the information to the UI Radar screen.
u/skuva — 1 month ago
▲ 1.4k r/Warthunder
If you are wondering why the Pucara's rockets feel so op, its because the Pampero rockets are literally broken and currently traveling 2.5x its proclaimed top speed of 530m/s (1908km/h).
As fast as some APFSDS, lol.
Please help with the report: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/oLHwlhBaP4wx
u/skuva — 1 month ago
▲ 46 r/Warthunder
Sim rewards suck, but it does feel good to see this after a long enjoyable match.
It really feels like progress has been made.
u/skuva — 2 months ago
▲ 145 r/Warthunder
Small compilation of funny Air Simulator Battles BRs that proves Gaijin isn't even using their broken sTatiSTiks balancing system anymore, and just going by vibes.
Context:
1 - Sagittario 2 same BR as post-ww2 jets. CL13Mk4 still 9.0 from players trolling the system.
2 - Su-27 same BR as Su-30mk2/mkk. Because these plane "obviously" have similar Air and Groud capabilities.
3 - F-16A with Aim-9L = 12.7, but if you give it the option of Python 3, br go down? (The Netz was moved down on the last br change, because...)
4 - Three Phantoms that are exactly the same, except one of them has worse flight performance, but is 0.7 br higher.
5 - One is not like the others.
u/skuva — 2 months ago
▲ 290 r/floggit
If I had a nickel for every time an unreasonably expensive upgrade for a digital F-14 was announced in early June 2026, I would have 2 nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice.
Yet again WarThunder managed to outflogg us by releasing something even sloppier and expensivier.
u/skuva — 3 months ago
▲ 619 r/RogueCore
For an object we need to defend against enemies that glue themselves to the side of it, the Elevator Engine surely has one of the worst hitbox I've ever seen.
How didn't anyone who tested the game get infuriated by it?
u/skuva — 3 months ago