Hi I am playing it on Alienware m17 R5 with AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT but CPU and GPU usage mostly remain below 50 percent as a result mostly FPS remain below 80 even though it should easily have 120 FPS. Anyone else having this issue of underutilized CPU and GPU?
If anyone wants to purchase FileLu Lifetime plan I can provide a referral link for it and it will be way cheaper than it is available on their website. Send me message if you are interested.
Drime 70 TB
FileLu 52 TB
Internxt 50 TB
FolderFort 20 TB
FileJump 10 TB
Icedrive 10 TB
Scramble 5 TB
Filen 2 TB
FileRule 2 TB
Koofr 1 TB
OnlineDrive 6 TB
All are lifetime plans
I was going back and forth with suppprt over Email about issue of uploads keep getting stuck on website and it has been 4 days and I did not get any response especially when I showed them that issue is with their server not my computer they stopped responding.
Many people seem almost eager for companies like OpenAI to fail, often pointing to their financial losses as proof that the business model is unsustainable. But very few of those critics offer a realistic alternative for the billions of people who now rely on AI.
​
If OpenAI disappeared tomorrow, what exactly is the replacement for the average person? Not for a few thousand AI enthusiasts with technical expertise and expensive hardware, but for students, workers, and ordinary people around the world.
​
Anthropic has already signaled a very different approach: if you want meaningful access to its best models, you are generally expected to pay. That is a perfectly valid business decision, but it means many people are effectively excluded. If you cannot afford $20 per month, what is your alternative? Going back to traditional search engines, where you have to sift through pages of results, advertisements disguised as content, SEO spam, and AI-generated summaries that are often less useful than a dedicated AI assistant?
​
Others point to open-source models, often developed by Chinese companies or research groups. But for most people, that is not a practical solution either. The vast majority of users do not know how to download, configure, and run local AI models. Even if they do, running them meaningfully often requires expensive hardware—typically a capable NVIDIA GPU or a modern Apple computer. For someone earning a few hundred dollars per month, spending around $1,000 or more on hardware is simply not realistic.
​
OpenAI reportedly serves close to a billion people every week. The overwhelming majority of those users are on free plans. Many are students. Many live in developing countries. Many have little or no disposable income. They cannot afford a $20 monthly subscription, and they certainly cannot afford high-end AI hardware.
​
These are the people OpenAI is currently serving while losing billions of dollars. I am not naive enough to believe that this is pure altruism. OpenAI is a business and will eventually need a sustainable path to profitability. But the fact remains that, today, they are providing advanced AI access to hundreds of millions of people who would otherwise have none.
​
OpenAI could choose a different path. It could restrict access, dramatically reduce free usage, or move toward a model where only paying customers receive meaningful service. That would likely improve its finances much faster. Yet for now, it continues to support a massive free user base.
​
If that support disappears, what is the realistic outcome? Most people will not suddenly become local AI experts. They will not buy expensive GPUs. They will not self-host open-source models. They will simply return to the most accessible option available: Google.
​
And that would mean even more dependence on a single dominant gatekeeper of information. For all the criticism directed at OpenAI's finances, the practical alternative for most people is not a vibrant open-source future. It is a return to Google's monopoly over how billions of people access information online.
Many people seem almost eager for companies like OpenAI to fail, often pointing to their financial losses as proof that the business model is unsustainable. But very few of those critics offer a realistic alternative for the billions of people who now rely on AI.
​
If OpenAI disappeared tomorrow, what exactly is the replacement for the average person? Not for a few thousand AI enthusiasts with technical expertise and expensive hardware, but for students, workers, and ordinary people around the world.
​
Anthropic has already signaled a very different approach: if you want meaningful access to its best models, you are generally expected to pay. That is a perfectly valid business decision, but it means many people are effectively excluded. If you cannot afford $20 per month, what is your alternative? Going back to traditional search engines, where you have to sift through pages of results, advertisements disguised as content, SEO spam, and AI-generated summaries that are often less useful than a dedicated AI assistant?
​
Others point to open-source models, often developed by Chinese companies or research groups. But for most people, that is not a practical solution either. The vast majority of users do not know how to download, configure, and run local AI models. Even if they do, running them meaningfully often requires expensive hardware—typically a capable NVIDIA GPU or a modern Apple computer. For someone earning a few hundred dollars per month, spending around $1,000 or more on hardware is simply not realistic.
​
OpenAI reportedly serves close to a billion people every week. The overwhelming majority of those users are on free plans. Many are students. Many live in developing countries. Many have little or no disposable income. They cannot afford a $20 monthly subscription, and they certainly cannot afford high-end AI hardware.
​
These are the people OpenAI is currently serving while losing billions of dollars. I am not naive enough to believe that this is pure altruism. OpenAI is a business and will eventually need a sustainable path to profitability. But the fact remains that, today, they are providing advanced AI access to hundreds of millions of people who would otherwise have none.
​
OpenAI could choose a different path. It could restrict access, dramatically reduce free usage, or move toward a model where only paying customers receive meaningful service. That would likely improve its finances much faster. Yet for now, it continues to support a massive free user base.
​
If that support disappears, what is the realistic outcome? Most people will not suddenly become local AI experts. They will not buy expensive GPUs. They will not self-host open-source models. They will simply return to the most accessible option available: Google.
​
And that would mean even more dependence on a single dominant gatekeeper of information. For all the criticism directed at OpenAI's finances, the practical alternative for most people is not a vibrant open-source future. It is a return to Google's monopoly over how billions of people access information online.
Koofr website is not working for me I was in middle to uploading files and upload failed I refreshed and the website is not loading other websites are working fine. Is it down for everyone ?
Web folder Uploads keep getting stuck at exactly 44 percent anyone else having this issue ?