u/throwaway2727648378

Would you have stepped in lol? Post

For word count, I've been lately reading about the AFBB's scientific sibling, the good gene ovulatory shift hypothesis. Apparently it's been 'debunked', many researchers were quick to accept and dump the hypothesis, but turns out at least one of the 'debunking study' did awful statistical analyses, they have no idea what they were doing, doing it properly supports GGOSH; the bp still remains strong. In summary, when females are fertile and are horny:

• Women’s extrapair desires (desire to have sex with someone else) are highest for women who think their partners are unattractive and for those where the guy stands lower relative to them.
• Women's increase in desire to have intrapair sex with partners will be strongest for those with attractive partners.

Did it ever begin? Even for normies, she will never truly desire them like chad; it's just not the same to her. Every month for about a week, when she's in need, she subtly (or not since the effect size was considered medium to large if you're 16th percentile attractiveness), she thinks of chad or some tall htn realistically. When she hits the wall and fertility drops, or nearing so, she finally is ready to settle with a nice, safe man after her fun! maybe personality 'matters' after all... A lot of women also try to defend their hookups and hypergamous preferences on the basis of distinguishing 'short-term' vs long-term contexts, but is there really such a distinction where once with a partner? short-term partners never lose relevance in the above robustly supported hypothesis even when 'committed' to someone

[removed]

They reward negative behavior in men.

Then complain all men act like this.

The jokes literally write themselves 😂😂😂