What do you guys think about adding anti-vehicle mines to the game ? I think they could add some interesting depth to the gameplay and give players more options for defending against enemy armor.
Would you like to see them in the game?
Kindly ask for your suggestion, anything to remove or change?, thanks.
Reason number 1: see image
Is it worth including two in every Russain guard deck?
WTF is happening to matchmaking? Where is the balance?
Hello, I have recently been building a stats website focused on players who are trying to achieve the maximum potential out of their gameplay by optimising every choice that they are making in deckbuilding, and it has reached a point where I am happy for people to take a look at it and give me their thoughts : )
The main features of the site that I think people will find most interesting are the following:
Currently the data includes every match played(~100,000) from the 14th of September -> 7th of October, with a random selection of ~5000 matches played in the weeks before that for comparison purposes. I am hoping that in time STB will give me direct access to the match data API, which would allow me to more easily keep my data current, and also offer an even more extensive feature set.
Corrin did a wonderful showcase of the sites features and potential use cases if people would find a video useful to help understand how to use it - but other than that I would love to hear any and all feedback, which would be best directed to my discord here.
Thank you to anyone who takes a look, I hope that it helps you in some small way to improve your understanding of the game.
Makes it a annoying when trying to play airborne armored or something with no sead yes decks have to miss stuff sead on a airdeck is just stupid makes it so I cant combine airborne with half the other groups except stryker and marines
3.M850 Main Battle Tank- the pinnacle of the Navy's armored development and could be considered the "hero" unit of the spec
The USA is extremely strong early game, with a powerful air-force, rapid deployment through vehicles and heli's, and very strong infantry.
Russia on the other hand, is usually very sluggish and expensive to set up, but once they set their AA , artillery and infantry up, they are EXTREMELY strong and hard to repel.
Usually , when the USA stomps Russia, its because they fought tooth and nail to NOT let Russia set up and relax, in order to hammer them with air.
What do you think?
