





In England the cult of King Charles the Martyr seems to have arisen shortly after the execution of Charles I, and The Society of King Charles the Martyr exists until today. Was Louis XVI ever venerated in the same way? I already read this very informative post explaining that the efforts to canonise Louis were very limited. Of course Charles could not be canonised, but apparently he enjoyed some genuine popular sympathy, which does not seem to be the case with Louis, but I'd love to know why.
I am reading Marie Thérèse - Child of Terror from Susan Nagel and the author seems pretty convinced that Louis XVI was in love with Mme de Polignac. That's the first time I hear about this hypothesis. Any opinions/sources about it?
In 1593, Henry of Navarre faced a political deadlock that seemed entirely impossible to break. He was the rightful King of France, but he was also a Protestant leader in a country whose capital and majority population were fiercely, uncompromisingly Catholic.
He could have chosen to wage a brutal war to conquer Paris by force, but he knew that a crown won through the slaughter of his own subjects wouldn't last. Instead, he chose a completely different kind of weapon: absolute political pragmatism. By uttering the famous words "Paris is well worth a Mass," he converted to Catholicism, walked into the city unarmed, and chose peace over ideological purity.
Henry IV’s conversion became a masterclass in statecraft, allowing him to pass the Edict of Nantes and finally end decades of religious slaughter. He proved that sometimes, the most radical act a leader can perform isn't fighting to the bitter end, but compromising to preserve the nation.
Been interested in doing a ranking series for a while like many other subs did, so thought we could try to rank Frankish/French monarchs from worst to best daily. Comment which monarchs should be disqualified from this ranking due to lack of information, lacking any time to make significant decisions, etc.
Rules:
For the sake of simplicity and the general lack of resources, only Merovingians who ruled as the sole King of the Franks will be included. Middle and East Carolingian rulers that did not rule West Francia are not included. Only monarchs with a clear, undisputed claim and rule are included.
Maximilien Robespierre: Revolutionary Hero or Tyrant?
Born in 1758, Robespierre was deeply influenced by Enlightenment philosophy, particularly Rousseau’s idea of the general will. As a lawyer, he became an advocate for the rights of the poor and an opponent of the monarchy.
When the French Revolution erupted in 1789, he emerged as a key figure in the National Assembly, pushing for radical democratic reforms, the abolition of slavery, and universal male suffrage. 2. From Revolution to Terror
As France descended into internal and external chaos, Robespierre joined the Committee of Public Safety, effectively leading the revolutionary government in 1793-1794.
During this time, the infamous Law of Suspects was enacted, allowing for the swift arrest and execution of anyone considered an "enemy of the revolution." Thousands, including King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette, were sent to the guillotine.
🗣 Robespierre famously declared: "Virtue without terror is powerless, and terror without virtue is cruel."
By mid-1794, even his revolutionary allies saw him as a threat. After executing fellow revolutionaries like Danton, opposition against him grew. On July 27, 1794 (9 Thermidor), Robespierre was arrested and guillotined the next day—ironically, by the same system of terror he had helped create.
Robespierre’s legacy is still debated today. Was he a necessary force protecting the revolution from its enemies? Or did he allow power and paranoia to corrupt his ideals, making him no different from the tyrants he opposed?
in the end:Even though Robespierre's intentions may have been noble, the means he used to achieve them were undeniably brutal and inhumane.
Sources:
🤔 What do you think? Was Robespierre a necessary revolutionary leader, or did he go too far? Let’s discuss!
While he's famous on his battles and rivalry but i wanna about his rulership in the empire also?
Most basic epithet ever but I think Clovis I should be called the great due to being a mighty warrior who first united the Frankish realm. Also feel like every king should have at least one epithet or nickname