
Imperial Women in Byzantium 1025-1204 by Barbara Hill (1999)
Is it just me, or are academic book covers trying too hard to reach new audiences?

Is it just me, or are academic book covers trying too hard to reach new audiences?
To some, he was the ruler who pushed the Eastern Roman Empire beyond its limits. To others, he was a political mastermind who restored Constantinople’s influence across the medieval world.
In this video, we explore the reign of Manuel Komnenos and the grand strategy behind his wars, alliances, diplomacy, and campaigns. From the threats surrounding the empire to the rival powers competing for control of the eastern Mediterranean, Manuel sought to transform Byzantium into the dominant force of his age.
But was his policy truly reckless—or was it a calculated attempt to secure the empire’s future through power, prestige, and influence?
Join us as we examine the legacy of one of Byzantium’s most fascinating emperors, the challenges he faced, and the fragile system he built around Constantinople.
In history there were many capable and competent Eastern Romen Rulers equal or greater than their Western European or Muslim counterparts.
However, one lingering perception of Eastern Romen rulership and politics, at least in pop sulture, has been it's legendarily ruthless and cut-throat politics and Emperors.
And while I am sure this has been exaggerated by enlightenment era writers, actions such as the blinding of the Bulgarians don't exactly paint the most "heroic" portrait of Roman rulership.
So what Emperors were, given their time period and the necessities of the job, actually fairly decent people to their subjects and family members.
Being an Emperor precludes anyone from being a saint, but was their ever an Eastern Romen Saladin, Cyrus, Taizong , Frederick the 2nd of the HRE, or Ahsoka.
Credit To The Himariot On YouTube For The Images Shown
Hi everyone,
am currently reading Anthony Kaldellis' wonderful book The New Roman Empire, in which he explains how the people of the ERE consistently regarded themselves as Romans.
Yet, in one of the chapters, he quotes an Armenian text from the fifth century that says: "We cannot become servants of the heathen Persians or be hostile to the king of the Greeks. Neither can we carry on hostilities with both of them. We cannot maintain ourselves without the support of one of them."
So I struggle to understand why an Armenian author would refer to the emperor as "King of the Greeks" and not as "King of the Romans."
I would appreciate any insight into this issue. Thanks!
The medieval GeoPol server we're playing on started in February, and we're still going!
We have been through many wars, most of them victorious, but nowadays we're focusing on consolidating, don't want to end up like poor Justin II hehe.
I'll show case some of our most impressive settlements so far, there is still yet much to do, we have lots of other towns and fortifications that haven't prospered so much, if you wanna join on your own, or with a group of friends and help us out, be my guest and contact me in dms!
Our vassals also need more people, in particular the Exarchate of Italy and Diocese of Egypt, we're working hard on reconstructing Roma, blending aspects from late medieval Rome and byzantine Rome, call it a "what if eastern Romans managed to take Rome back at a later point in the medieval era".
Egypt is brand new and nothing has been built there. Alexandria hasn't been planned yet, but the Pharos lighthouse will be there.
This is the capital of our Empire, founded by the Roman emperor Constantine the Great (Byzantium before hand yadi yada), it has everything a great capital needs, in fact, Constantine drew a lot of inspiration from the city of Rome itself when designing this city. It is probably one of the biggest cities on the server. Famous landmarks are Hagia Sophia, the Hippodrome, the Great Palace, the Theodosian Walls, Senate house and the Forum of Constantine.
Currently, we are building more houses for the people, we have plenty of free rooms in the insulas and lots of plots you can build in. We hold most of our RP events in this city, and we're planning on more as well.
We have a university and a library, still under construction, goal would be to write the entire bible down at some point, but also other categories of literature; be it the classics from antiquity, byzantine literature or books based on what's going on in the server, such as diaries, travel guides or legal documents.
Konstantinoupolis really needs a group, currently we're mostly made up of randoms, there is very little sense of community, difficulty in keeping activity going around. We might extend the city further out west, essentially making a new line of defences, and redesign certain parts of town, its going to change the port design, industrial area, farms, housing etc.
This city lies to the west of Constantinople on a river delta (historicaly speaking it was on the eastern side of the river), it has a beautiful castle built on top of a hill, the plan in the future is to make the town around it, and with a new set of outer walls. Adrianople has only one resident, so we need more people here, preferably a friend group or something along those lines. If you desire a fresh start, lots of space for building and safety, then this is a good choice.
West of Adrianople lies Thessaloniki. This is one of our greater cities, it doesn't really need inhabitants, but more builders are sought after, as they are doing very well and technically have a lot of people in their town. Some famous monuments here such as the Rotunda of Galerius, Hagios Demetrios and the Hippodrome there
One of our greatest cities, comparable to Thessaloniki and Constantinople. This city, alongside Corinth, has gained some traction recently, there are cities with bigger needs than them, as they are quite active, but these are good places to see what our faction represents, as well as good starting places to learn about how the server works. Athens' pride is their fleet, it is probably the largest on the server. A very cozy city to live in.
The heart of Anatolia, this is currently just a humble fort, but the plan is to turn it into a proper city, lots of potential. Terrain is very flat, the inhabitants are competent and they have big plans. It’s owned by the Domestikos of the East, the leader of the eastern army. Anatolia is under his juris dictation. Amorion was a very important town in Anatolia after the Early Arab Expansions, being so central in Anatolia and the road system.
We have lots of other towns, some are very humble, some are quite developed but players are inactive and some haven't even been built, so lots of potential for new players to establish their own towns with their friend group or clans.
Amongst these are Smyrna, Attaleia, Korinthos, Thera, Corfu, Ohrid, Philippopolis, Theodoro, Kallipolis. Rhodes and Nikaea are active, but in their infancy in developing. Kyzicus was a great town, but due to many reasons they had to abandon the town. The enormous walls and towers are unguarded and the houses empty, left behind and falling into ruin like many historical byzantine cities in the aftermath of the initial Arab invasions.
Thats all for now, take care, if you have any questions let me know!
[I managed to make this post into an AMA, no idea what it is so I just ended it]
I just bought this book and I was wondering if anyone read this and is it a good starter to learn about the Byzantines?
I'm not a historian or a scientist but I read a lot and imo the Eastern Roman Empire was not a good thing for the citizens of present Greece and the policies followed afterwards by the Ottomans were largely based on the same principles that the Byzantines used to govern present Greece. A large part of the Ottoman elite were Byzantines, Ottomans relied a lot on these elites and the knowledge they gathered from the Byzantines to rule their new empire. After Ottomans took control, you had dozens of revolutions in Greece but barely any from Greeks on Minor Asia. Minor Asia Greeks enjoyed insane benefits while mainland Greeks were essentially slaves that suffered extreme oppression. It was two different worlds. The minor Asia Greeks did not want the 1821 revolution to happen and opposed it fiercely.
Greeks tend to glorify a specific person or periods disregarding their historic impact to their country. EG. Alexander the Great is considered the most important Greek but everyone forget how many Greek city-states rebelled against him and sided with the West Romans, they forget about the dissolution of democracy and the oppression followed afterwards, the complete destruction of Thebes etc. They also forget that the invasion of anatolia/asia is what left Greece weakened and vulnerable with so many resources directed to maintain control over such a large space that was not Greek in culture.
When it comes to the Byzantine period, it is considered the most important period for modern Greeks but they forget that after the fall of Western Roman Empire, present Greece was left to rot and all the centers of wealth and knowledge were transferred to cities in minor Asia, some of this occurred with the use of violence such as the close of Plato's academy on Athens by Justinian because the Byzantines did not like the culture and religion of Greeks. Greeks forget about the chaos that occurred during the Byzantine period in Greece, raids, settlements by foreign populations (Slavs), there was no control, no protection, no security, they forget about the insane taxes of the Byzantines. Mainland Greeks were already treated unofficially as "second class" and less important during the Byzantine period, Ottomans took a system that already existed and just drove it to new extremes, what made it easier for the Greeks to rebel during the Ottoman period is that they viewed the Ottomans as foreign and Ottomans were more clear about what they were doing and more brutal than the Byzantines.
Western Roman Empire was a benevolent being for present day Greece, they built a lot of stuff, they brought wealth and they respected the culture and religion, most Greeks preferred it over Macedonian rule especially those from southern Greece. Athens was the center of knowledge and all of the West Roman elite studied there. This is not true for the Eastern Roman Empire, imo Eastern Romans brought ruin to Greece and should not be respected by modern Greeks. Ottomans were essentially rebranded Byzantines, they continued the exact same policies but even worse than before.
Greeks also had 200 year rule by Latins, I don't have a specific opinion on this, so I can't make comparison between Latins and Byzantines, I think the Latins improved some cities in southern Greece and improved commerce with the west but I don't know if the situation of Greece was better.
You can tell me if you disagree with my views. As a Greek, I personally don't respect Alexander the Great and I don't respect the Byzantines either. I don't consider the Byzantines to be Greeks either. It's just that our language back then was like the English of today, just because your state's language is English, it doesn't mean you are British or an ally of Great Britain. Byzantines were a foreign thracian/anatolian culture.
I Learned A Bunch Of The Chants And Where They Originate From And What Their Meanings Are. I Never Realized How Rich The History Behind, And Just The Chanting & Music Itself Is. Probably My New Favorite Music Genre Ngl.
I'm curious—what are you guys reading right now, and what do you think of it so far?
I'm currently reading The Emperor Theophilos and the East, 829–842: Court and Frontier in Byzantium during the Last Phase of Iconoclasm by Juan Signes Codoñer, and so far I'm really enjoying it. It's clearly a very well-researched study, and I've learned a lot from it.
My main criticism so far is the author's tendency to identify an extraordinary number of individuals as Armenian, often on what seems to be fairly limited evidence—sometimes simply because they have an Armenian-sounding name.
That reminded me of a chapter by Kaldellis in Romaland, so I went back to reread it. I hadn't realized at the time that he was specifically discussing this book. It was interesting to discover that many of the concerns I was having while reading are the same ones he raises.
But despite that criticism, I think it's an excellent piece of scholarship, and I'm looking forward to the rest of it.
So, what are you all reading these days?
These are maps I have made for my own story set in an Alternate History Roman Empire, currently under the name Childish Dreams. These maps were made for Worldbuilding purposes so I could track the History involved, but I am posting them now because I figured you guys might like them.
These maps track the territorial changes in the Southern Balkans and Anatolia at the death of each major Roman (Byzantine) Emperor from 1329 onwards. I will also include the worldbuilding I had come up with to explain why the borders are the way that they are, as well as a legend to identify which colors are what.
I hope the way I did the map isn't too distracting. I tried to portray the almost nebulous nature of pre-modern borders by signifying areas of lesser control in a lighter shade of color than those of higher control.
I abandoned it in the later maps, but let me know what you thought of it, though!
I hope you guys do like it!
---
General Legend:
Purple: The Empire of the Romans (Roman Empire|Byzantine Empire)
Light Gray: The Empire of Serbians, Albanians, and Greeks (Serbian Empire)
Lime Green: The Empire of Bulgarians and Vlachs (Second Bulgarian Empire)
Red (Aegean Region): Stato da Mar (Greek holdings of Venice)
Brown (Egypt): The Sultanate of the Turks/Circassians (Mamluk Sultanate)
Hot Pink (Pontus): The Empire of the East, the Ibers, and Perateia (Despotate of Trebizond)
Red (In Anatolia): Beylik of Osman (Ottomans)
Dark Grey: Beylik of Candar/Isfendiyar (Isfendiyarid/Isfendiyarid)
Darkest Grey (Rhodes): Hospitaller Knights of Rodos (Hospitaller Rhodes)
Teal Green (In Anatolia): Beylik/Emirate of Karaman (Karamanids)
Gold: Beylik of Eretna/Emirate of Erzincan (Eretnids/Erzincan)
Rust-Red: Beylik of Aydın (Aydınids)
Orange-Brown: Beylik of Germiyan (Germiyanids)
---
Map 1: The Empire at the death of Emperor Andronikos III Palaiologos: (1349)
The main point of Divergence is two events:
In this timeline, Emperor Andronikos had accomplished similar gains as in our current timeline, but with two major additions.
In addition to these gains, Andronikos III would also have more time to attempt a reversal of his grandfather's (Andronikos II Palaiologos) disbanding of the Roman Navy, procuring the more modern galleys from Venice and Genoa, and reintroducing native Roman production of seafaring vessels.
Map 2: The Empire at the death of Emperor John V Palaiologos: (1391)
Many of the consequences of Andronikos III not dying so early would be immediately felt.
Instead of retiring to the Morea, John Kantakouzenos is allowed to continue working in the Empire's bureaucracy. At first, as Co-Emperor, but then, after being dismissed by John V, as Imperial Mesazon (Foreign Mediator, but very prestigious), allowing for greater relations between the Romans and the Turks (but without the very imbalanced position in our own timeline).
John V Palaiologos would generally have a fairly stable reign, allowing the economy to recover from the wars undertaken by his father and reducing corruption thanks to the 'Universal Justices of the Romans'. Now, the Romans in the reign of John V are only challenged by the Italians and the Latin Lords of the Aegean and Peloponnese, who wouldn't be too happy about a resurgent Roman naval presence in the Aegean.
A series of naval Skirmishes between the still-evolving Roman Navy and the Venetians and Genoese eventually became a small war against the Duchy of Naxos (Lasting from 1376-1377), which was a major Venetian holding in the Aegean.
The Roman Navy, which was supplied and supplemented by the vessels of the Beylik of Aydın, contested the Genoese and Venetian power on the waves under the command of John Kantakouzenos' son, Matthew Asen Kantakouzenos. The Roman Army, now supplemented with the descendants of the Catalan Company from Attica, stormed the islands themselves under the command of Emperor John V's son, Kaisar Andronikos Palaiologos. This led to the successful recapture of the island of Naxos and its surroundings
A following war for the island of Crete (Duchy of Candia) was also waged, but ended up going nowhere as the Romans suffered heavy losses and were forced to return to pacify Naxos and the rest of the Aegean, which they now had firm control over.
The many Latin families in the Aegean, including the Genoese Dorian Family and the Gattilusio, would be formally integrated into the Empire during John V's reign; case in point, the marriage of Emperor John V's sister, Irene Palaiologina, to Francisco Gattilusio, who would become the Latin Lord of Lesbos.
John V would die of old age, successfully stabilizing his Empire, and peacefully pass it to Andronikos IV, his eldest son.
Map 3: The Empire at the death of Emperor Andronikos IV Palaiologos (1402)
Ever since his formal introduction to Roman Politics, Andronikos IV would prove to be like his Grandfather in his tenacity for war. As a Strategos in the few wars undertaken by John V, he would prove to be gifted in strategy and unbound in his tenacity for violence.
Since the Roman Position is far stronger in this timeline than in ours, Andronikos would have little reason to revolt against his father. He wouldn't be in Venice, and his Empire wouldn't be vassals of the Ottomans. This would lead to him and his father having a far better family dynamic.
Upon ascending as sole Emperor at the death of his father, he quickly began taking advantage of the reinvigorated Roman navy, the product of his father's and grandfather's reforms. There, he would crack down on Latin meddling in the Mediterranean. In his reign, the Latin-controlled city of Smyrna would finally fall to the Romans, as well as the surrounding territory of Saruhan.
Due to the alliance with Aydın held previously by his father, only Aydın was left as the sole Turkish naval power in the region following their conquest of Halikarnassos and their victory over the Beyliks of Teke and Hamid.
Andronikos would also improve the standing army, solidifying the "Grand Allagia" system that was put into place by the Emperors of Nikaea, and begin recruiting from the growing populations of Latin men and Gasmouloi (Descendants of Latin and Greeks). One major change was the dependence of the Tzangratoroi, the Roman Crossbowmen, whose ranks would swell with Genoese recruits and be trained by Genoese captains.
Alongside the Latin recruits from Attica and the Aegean, he would also recruit from the Turks, mainly those who fled Ottoman and Karesi territory as the Germiyanids continued to wage their war, but also recruit from recently taken territory from the Beylik of Isfendiyar. Many of these Turkish Recruits would end up converting to Christianity and join the Roman army as archers and horse-archers.
Emboldened by his strengthened army and an Empire well fed economically, Andronikos would wage war for Achaea, taking advantage of the chaos wrought by Louis II Anjou's war for the Throne of Naples against King Ladislaus. Patras would fall after several months of siege by both land and sea, their messages for help unanswered due to the war in mainland Italy. The rest of the Achaean Latins would swear fealty to Andronikos.
Following the campaign against Achaea, Andronikos would begin to ally with Genoa, allowing fewer restrictions in their trade in the cities of Thessaloniki, Mytilene, and enlarged quarters in the Golden Horn. Andronikos would also lean heavily on the many Genoese-Roman alliances forged between the many families, such as the Genoese-leaning Gattilusio and Doria families. The closer relation to Genoa would form a greater threat to the Venetian Stato da Mar, thus allowing greater leverage for the Roman Empire against the Serenic Republic.
One of the many fruits of the alliance with Genoa was the seeding of Venice's two 'Eyes' on the Peloponnese, Modon (Methoni) and Coron (Koroni), in exchange for greater privileges in Galata and the reestablishment of the Venetian quarter in Smyrna.
The last of Andronikos IV's major campaigns was the war he waged in the east to assist the Beyliks threatened by the encroaching state of Iran and Turan, led by the conqueror Timur Gurkani.
Anatolia never united under a truly unifying force, falling into a cycle of tribal warfare. Eventually, three Beyliks, then Emirates, formed. Germiyan, which had grown strong from its wars with the descendants of Osman. Karaman, which had seized much of Kappadokia and the lands formerly owned by the Kingdom of Kilikia. And Eretna, which was the strongest of the three major Beyliks/Emirates until the overthrow of the Eretnid Dynasty by the Emirs of Erzincan.
During a conflict between Karaman and Erzincan, Erzincan had called Timur for aid, leading to crushing defeats for Karaman and the rest of the Turkish Beyliks who joined Karaman to oppose the overwhelming force of Timur. This included the armies of Germiyan, Aydın, and even a force sent by Trebizond, Isfendiyar, and the Ottomans.
Soon, envoys from the Ottomans, Aydinids, and even Germiyanids were sent to the court of the Romans in Constantinople, promising the fealty of their people in exchange for Roman Help.
The Romans obliged. Andronikos was eager for war, emboldened by earlier victories, and quickly mustered a great host that swelled with Turkish forces. Even the Trapezuntines, who were late in sending men and material, pledged support for the Empire.
The fighting was slow and drew out for several long days, drawing close to the city of Ancyra. The Romans utilized the Nafta employed by the Turks to frighten Timur's Elephants and successfully repel several assaults by Timur. However, aware of his own disadvantage against a force equally as impressive as his own, Timur had decided to call off his attack and agree to talk with the Emperor of the Romans.
However, one of Timur's elephants, frightened by fire, charged the Emperor as he was approaching Timur to parley, skewering the Emperor on one of its tusks. Thus ending the reign of Emperor Andronikos.
Map 4: The Empire during the Civil War between Manuel II Palaiologos and John VI (Our John VII) Palaiologos: (1402-1407)
The immediate aftermath of the incident that took Andronikos IV's life was thankfully not violent. The elephant was put to death by the Romans, and Timur, who was apologetic, continued peace talks with whoever stepped forward to parley.
That was supposed to be John, Andronikos IV's son, but instead Manuel, brother of Andronikos IV, stepped forward, claiming to be the new Emperor of the Romans.
The issue became apparent almost immediately. John was in Constantinople acting as regent to his father, so he could not contest. And so Timur recognized Manuel as Roman Emperor, and so did many of the Turks who were led by Andronikos IV.
Upon hearing of his father's death and Manuel's open revolt, John quickly had himself crowned in the Hagia Sofia and called for Manuel to return home and disband his army. Manuel refused, ordering John to either step down or for Manuel to be crowned Co-Emperor.
John would refuse.
Many of the native Roman commanders and the landowners under Manuel's army would return to the service of Constantinople (John), while most of the Turkish Commanders would remain with Manuel due to promises of land and gold. One of the exceptions was the Turks of the Ottomans, who chose to leave and return to their own land to take advantage of Germiyan's men flocking to Manuel's side, believing the Civil War to be an opportunity to get one over on their generational foe.
John had control over the cities and the navy, while Manuel held most of the mercenaries and the Anatolian countryside. When Manuel tried to besiege a city, he was easily repulsed. But when John tried to send men to defeat him, the men were quickly and thoroughly crushed in deadly ambushes. This was how it was for five years.
Several of the Empire's neighbors, including the Beylik of Isfendiyar and the Beylik of Osman, had taken advantage of the civil war, raiding into the Anatolian countryside and even capturing Roman cities in the case of Isfendiyar, which had managed to claim and besiege much of the territory of Optimaton.
Even the Bulgarians and Serbs, who had long looked in different directions to satiate their ambitions, once again turned to the Romans. Aydın, which had been a long, faithful ally of the Romans, began acting on their ambitions, taking the lands of Teke and Hamid, and began contesting the Roman Navy at sea with the help of the ever-present Venetians.
The Bulgarians, in particular, began eyeing Roman territory, eagerly extorting Roman cities for protection during the conflict, and even besieging major cities like Philippopolis. Their attempts were only broken when a contingent of Serbians and Romans led by Prince Stefan Lazarević and an old Roman officer from Giannitsa broke the siege.
Thankfully, John had a break while Manuel was attempting to parley with the Bulgarians. John's men intercepted his caravan and took Manuel prisoner.
John was angry, but ultimately, he was just glad the fighting had stopped. Manuel was imprisoned, ending with him being exiled to Mount Athos.
Map 5: The Empire at the death of Emperor John VI (Our John VII) Palaiologos (1428)
The reign of John VII in our timeline was marred by his rivalry with Manuel Palaiologos as well as the general situation of the Empire, what with being under the Ottomans’ thumb. Without all of that baggage, or at least without the heaviest baggage, this is how I imagined John VI (VII) to rule. (I will refer to him as John VI from here on; THERE ARE NO KANTAKOUZENOI EMPERORS).
This is also the era where the story of the protagonist of my writing project will begin (Specifically my protagonist’s grandfather).
John VI, judging from his rule of Thessalonika in our timeline, would rule justly and stably, but, like in our timeline, have to make do with the situation he has been dealt. I think he would be very proactive in helping the Empire rebuild from the civil war between him and Manuel, as well as solidifying the alliances his father Andronikos made with the Turkic Beyliks in the fallout of Timur’s departure.
One of the biggest pain points is dealing with the lands of Optimaton taken by Isfendiyar and the power exerted by Aydin’s navy after the integration of Hamid and Teke territory.
To supplement his forces, John VI decided to hinge on Manuel’s connections to Serbia, specifically through Manuel’s Marriage to Helena Dragaš, a daughter of a powerful Serbian noble family that took control over much of southern Serbia following the interregnum period caused by the death of the heirless Dušan V.
As a consequence, Manuel was permitted to return from his exile as a military advisor to John VI. To further please the Dragaš family, the oldest son of Manuel and Helena would be given the title Sebastokrator and be made next in line to the throne.
One particular figure who would end up joining John VI’s wars is the tall prince Stefan Lazarević, whose wife, Helena Gattilusio, was the daughter of the recently deceased Lord of Lesbos. He would be asked to fight for the sake of her wife’s Empire, and the prince, eager for glory and loyal to his love, would pledge his sword to the Empire of the Romans, much to the dismay of the Lords of the Morava.
Another figure who would join John VI’s war was an extremely old Roman Strategos hailing from Giannitsa. During the campaigns in Turkish territory, the mercenaries who would fight under him would call him “Evren”. The Romans who fought under him, too, would adopt the name as “Evrenos”.
Those three figures would help to resolidify Roman control in Anatolia. The lands of Aydin and Isfendiyar would receive the most exemplary punishment.
Manuel would lead the Roman navy with an official from the Morea named Demetrios Laskaris Leontares, and they would crush the Aydinid navy. Soon, they would capture much of Aydinid territory, reducing the Beylik’s territory to what they had conquered from Hamid and Teke. Coastal cities like Halikarnassos and Attaleia would return to Roman hands.
Further north, Evrenos and Lazarević would wage their war with Isfendiyar. They were bogged down by the constant harassment from neighboring tribes, however, and soon the conflict slowed to a crawl in the region of Bithynia once the Beylik of Isfendiyar was pushed out of Optimaton.
To further supplement their forces, the two commanders engaged in diplomacy with the Ottomans. One of the many chosen to delegate with the Ottomans was a Lord of the House of Angelos, a son who had descended from a line that had splintered off from the main Angelid dynasty in Epirus upon the death of Sevastokrator John Angelos to the Black Death.
Alexios Angelos was a charming and charismatic diplomat, earning favor from many high-ranking members of the Ottoman Court, and was crucial in the Roman attempt to secure backing from the Ottomans.
Their newfound Ottoman allies gladly aided the Romans through the forested hills of Bithynia and aided them in several battles up towards Paphlagonia. Eventually, Isfendiyar was relegated only to Paphlagonia.
John VI’s reign wasn’t as stable as the one run by John V. His reign began with a weakened Empire that evolved into an Empire that healed through war.
In the end, John VI died of natural causes and was buried in the Monastery of the Pantokrator.
Map 6: The Empire at the death of Emperor John VII (Our John VIII) Palaiologos (1459)
This is going to be a lighter exposition than the previous because this is the period my writing project is specifically going to take place (Specifically in the early 1450s). He will be referred to as John VII exclusively.
John VII was crowned Emperor following John VI’s funeral. The pact of alliance between the Dragaš family and the Palaiologians bore the fruit of the crown which now sat on John VII’s head. He would feel undeserving of the crown, feeling as though it should belong to the son of John VI, Andronikos. However, to please both his father and mother, he would bear it, instead promising that Andronikos’ son would be made Emperor after John VII’s death.
John VII’s rule is focused almost entirely on stabilizing the Empire left behind by John VI. To support this endeavor, John VII would be more diplomatic, sealing alliances and ensuring cordial relations with the Empire’s neighbors.
One surprising fruit was a (very) tentative pact with Venice through exchanges with the Principality of Arberia that gave Venicians more privileges in exchange for Venetian armaments and galleys.
One such major development was gunpowder. A mix of both eastern and western gunpowder techniques had piqued the Empire’s military minds. John VII was an eager patron of the substance, comparing it to the Greek Fire that was lost following the Fourth Crusade, whose only remnants could be seen in the Nafta used by the Muslims of the East.
The early Wars of John VII would be a test of the future of warfare. Roman armies, strengthened by Italian arms and armor, would march east to put an end to Isfendiyar and bring Paphlagonia back into the light of Rome. Alongside that, Roman galleys armed with mortars would besiege and take the coastal ports of the Emirate of Karaman.
One major commander during the campaign against Isfendiyar would be Gabriel Angelos, son of Alexios Angelos, who would be instrumental in the fall of Sinope.
Map 7: The Empire at the death of Emperor Leo VII Palaiologos (1487)
This is just a crackshoot map. The Emperor is a what-if grandson of John VI (Our John VII). Realistically, he would be named John VIII, but I think having so many people named John is bad worldbuilding (Joke).
This map takes place well after the story I had planned and has far less thought into it. I’d go more in depth, but it would spoil a little bit of the project I’m making, and I’d rather give it the time it needs when I actually get there.
—
I hope you all enjoy this world I had made up for myself!
I have been working on this project for quite some time now, and in between College and General-Life stuff, I had little time to dedicate to this Alt-Hist world I’m building.
Again, I hope you all enjoy! Critiques are very Welcome!
I got permission from the Fallen Eagle's main modeller to take his Constantinople model and remake it for the medieval age. Changes include; Fortified Blachernae Walls, Remade Blachernae Palace, Expanded and fortified Boukeleon Palace, Buttresses added to the Hagia Sophia, Remade Hagia Irene, Cut back on outskirt apartments for farms and estates.
For example, when Greece captured the island of Letmos from the Ottomans in 1912, Greek soldiers were sent to every town and stationed in the public squares. Some children on the island ran to see what the Greek soldiers looked like. “What are you looking at?” one of the soldiers asked. “At the Greeks,” the children replied. “And aren’t you Greeks?” the soldier retorted. “No, we’re Romans,” the children answered.