u/Alternative_Tank9353

What do you think?

I was reading more about the station, but I can't find any recent pictures/videos of the seating area

Every time I don't get something right away the first time, he barks at me. Additionally, when he would return my first office action, he told me to fix the issues and submit it back right away for credit. Therefore, I never thought to ask him or other team members for verification before re-submitting the first few times.

Can anyone else relate? I found that breaking down the claims by limitation really helped me, though I always seem to be missing some procedural requirement before re-submitting.

The issue is that I started a new job that pays well, but my immediate supervisor seems very critical over even minor details. I also realized that he could have given more guidance in certain aspects.

Edit: Five upvotes in three minutes tells me a lot

https://dokumen.pub/manhood-in-the-making-cultural-concepts-of-masculinity-9780300157253.html

From "Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity" (1990) by Professor David Gilmore

>One early visitor, James Morrison, gave this account based on observations between 1789 and i79iThey have a set of men called Mahoo [mahu]. These men are in some respects like the Eunichs [sic] in India but are not castrated. They never cohabit with women but live as they do. They pick their beards out and dress as women, dance and sing with them and are as effeminate in their voice. They are generally excellent hands at making and painting of cloth, making mats and every other women's employment. They are esteemed valuable friends in that way.

Sometimes, when riding, the bus changes number at a stop out of nowhere. This caused me to be stuck at a stop for 20 mins.

Another issue is when both northbound and southbound routes come to the same stop.

This is because I am a railfan, and want to commute to USPTO and back every day using Amtrak. Union Station also is a very nice place to shop and dine.

I am technically not a librarian, but I enjoy doing history research in various areas for fun. Recently, I was reading about Harry Sinclair Drago, a Western writer, and saw these ID records for him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Sinclair_Drago#External_links

Almost all of these databases list his birth year as 1888. However, the earliest records of his life list the year as 1886:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Sinclair_Drago#Early_life_and_journalism_career

Apparently, from the late 19th-early 20th century, many people could get away with slightly moving their birth years forward so people would think they were younger. This would be why many usually-reliable sources list his birthdate as 1888. I think the 1886 year makes the most sense since these records are the oldest. However, how can the birth year be fixed in all the databases?

Consecutive means that the person in the fall and spring semesters is either enrolled in class, registered for a co-op, or on leave of absence. I won't count summer.

Graduate study also would count for this. I know one person who got everything from BS-PhD in 11 years. Also, I know one person who is entering his eighth year as an undergrad (repeated major-switching and some co-ops), and another who did eight years of BS, minor, MS, and co-ops.