what's the correct pronunciation of फ
Is it pronounced as "pha" or "fa"
Is it pronounced as "pha" or "fa"
I know it's a bit advanced for beginner like me, but I wish to understood how riti of a particular poet is understood. Thankyou
As per rules, after ष र, न becomes ण, so that explains रामेण etc. but why रामान retains न ?
A grieving widower man fights against the world to bring back his love of life... Not a very original idea, but he has a very strong backstory, u may feel sympathy for him. (Although I'm not justifying his actions, what he did)
he made some dumb decisions, (honestly the credits for his victory in S5 goes to Felix) But I don't see him as a typical evil villain who wants to ends the world and create chaos.
From S5, he becomes insane, perhaps using too many miraculouses at once, it can cause mental and physical strain. He became more obsessed with defeating ladybug than reviving emilie(Evolution)
Later his relationship with nathalie gets strained. And yet in finale, he sacrifices himself to revive her. Did he love her? or thought her as adrien's guardian? maybe. i really wish to see how does nathalie views this sacrifice.
Additionally, he was also betraying the kingdom too? if I vaguely remember from yaksi gozen.
even when's gone, he's still there, he's still influencing the story in some way and maybe we learn more about him in s7
His character, his dynamic with adrien (he knew he wasn't a good father[my headcanon is that he blamed adrien for emilie's condition and considers him as a mistake]) and his arc are really intriguing.
This was the old concept art of mayura(?). I'm not sure, but I remember a user pointing out similarities between her and Emilie/Amelie. The eyes, face, bodyshape etc. I kinda believe that she's modelled after Emilie and maybe this was her form as a holder of peacock miraculous.
I just wanted to confirm if we have choose from DU specified list or we can choose from our own.
for eg if i wanna do sociology+psychology but there're not colleges offering the combo, can I customize it?
I see people saying that Lila is one of the most well written character in the show; I would be a bit cautious while saying the same. Until her character isn't explored, her backstory isn't shown, I can't consider her well written
My issues with her character
• Over-the-top lies: Her lies are superficial and rarely believable; everyone acting dumb around her, not questioning her, makes it worse. Her lies aren't backed by any evidence either. And everyone believing it except Marinette is weird
• Why does she has so many moms? It's shown in the show that she has multiple mothers, around 4 till now. The show doesn't even provide answers to it. Is her plan too big that she requires multiple residences in the same city? Why can't she has one? Why does her plan requires multiple mothers? These are big questions, if left unanswered, her character wouldn't make any sense.
• what does she writes so much? Although it's shown that she writes about about marinette, and other characters, where they were during a particular event and about the miraculer team. But why does she has piles of notebooks (I take it as an aggregation to depict how well organised she is and not throwing stones randomly and how smart she is)? If she looses after doing this much, then what's the point of her writing all such stuff.
• Lack of backstory - I would blame writers for not showing any backstory of her or not even glimpse. Where and how she was born? who are her real parents? When did she acquire such a mastery in fencing? What's her motivation?
Makers have introduced a lot of elements in her character, without giving any explanation about it in the show YET. (Oh yeah, I forgot that major stuff happens offscreen)
If they won't address points 2, 3, and 4. I can't really consider her a well written character. She has great premises, potential and elements, no doubt. But explanations should be provided about them. If she gonna loose at the end, then what's point of having multiple mothers? Why does she complicates her life so much?
चिन्म्यस्याद्वितीयस्य निष्कलस्याशरीरिणः । उपासकानां कार्यार्थं ब्रह्मणो रूपकल्पना ।।7।।
Although the cit-svarūpa Paramātmā is advitīya (non-dual), niṣkala (without divisions or distinctions), and aśarīrī (bodiless), nevertheless, for the practical purposes of upāsakas (worshippers), various forms (rūpa) of such Brahman are imagined or conceived (rūpa-kalpanā).
रूपस्थानां देवतानां पुंस्त्र्यङ्गास्त्रादिकल्पना । द्विचत्वारिषडष्टानां दश द्वादश षोडश ॥৪॥ अष्टादशामी कथिता हस्ताः शङ्खादिभिर्युताः । सहस्त्रान्तास्तथा तासां वर्णवाहनकल्पना ।।9।। शक्तिसेनाकल्पना च ब्रह्मण्येवं हि पञ्चधा । कल्पितस्य शरीरस्य तस्य सेनादिकल्पना ।।10।।
In that Brahman whose essential nature has been described above, conceptions are made of deities possessing form (rūpavān devatāḥ), of male forms (puṁ-rūpa), female forms (strī-rūpa), bodily limbs such as hands and feet (aṅga), and weapons such as arrows (astra).
In the various forms assumed by Paramātmā, forms are conceived as having two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve, or sixteen arms. Forms with eighteen arms are also described. These hands are said to hold objects such as the śaṅkha and other divine emblems.
When Brahman is conceived in the form of the Virāṭ-rūpa, those arms may even number in the thousands.
In these various manifestations (vigraha-rūpas) of Paramātmā, different colours (varṇa) and vehicles (vāhana) are also imagined. Likewise, various powers (śakti) and armies or retinues (senā) are conceived.
Furthermore, five principal forms of divinity are imagined in Brahman—namely Viṣṇu, Śiva, Durgā, Sūrya, and Gaṇeśa. Along with these conceptions, their respective attendants, armies, and associated retinues are also imagined.
कदा ध्यानाभ्यासैः क्वचिदपि सपर्यां विकसितैः सुगंधैः सत्पुष्पैः क्वचिदपि दलैरेव विमलः । प्रकुर्वन्देवस्य प्रमुदितमनाः संनतिपरो मुनिर्न व्यामोहं भजति गुरुदीक्षाक्षततमाः ॥ ६॥
Sometimes engaged in the practices of Abstract meditation; sometimes in the worship of the Lord, in joy and humility; with fragrant flowers in bloom or with good petals and leaves; The sage, with ignorance dispelled by Guru's grace (dèkshá), is not at all deluded.
शिवायाः शंभोर्वा क्वचिदपि च विष्णोरपि कदा गणाध्यक्षस्यापि प्रकटितवरस्यापि च कदा ।
पठन्वै नामालिं नयनरचितानन्दसरितो मुनिर्न व्यामोहं भजति गुरुदीक्षाक्षततमाः ॥ ७॥
Chanting the many names with tears of joy welling in the eyes, Sometimes of the consort of shiva (Sakti), at times of Sambhu (shiva), sometimes of Vishnu, And then of Ganapati and sometimes of the visible Sun; The sage, with ignorance dispelled by Guru's grace (dèksá), is not at all deluded.
क्वचिच्छैवैः सार्थं क्वचिदपि च शाक्तैः सह वसन्क दा विष्णोर्भक्तैः क्वचिदपि च सौरैः सह वसन्। कदा गाणापत्यैर्गतसकलभेदोऽद्वयतया मुनिर्न व्यामोहं भजति गुरुदीक्षाक्षततमाः ॥ १४॥
Living at ease somewhere in the company of shaivas and elsewhere with sháktas, And still in another place with the devotees of Vishnu or the Sun, Sometimes with Ganapati's worshippers and thus with all difference gone with the feeling of one-ness; The sage, with ignorance dispelled by Guru's grace (dèkshá), is not at all deluded.
Sita on the real nature of Rama (32-43)
Sita said: 32. Know Rama to be the Supreme Brahman-the Existence-Know-ledge-Bliss Absolute, the One without a second. He is Pure Existence devoid of all adjuncts, whom the senses cannot perceive as their object.
33. Know Rama as pure Bliss, as devoid of all impurity, as peace, as changeless Substance, as free from the stain of ignorance, as all-pervading Spirit, as devoid of all disvalues, and as self-revealing Conscious-ness.
34. Know me to be the Primeval Prakriti, the material and instrumental cause of the creation, sustentation and dis-solution of the universe. In the mere presence of Rama the Supreme Brahman, His Prakriti (Power), create the universe un-wearied.
adhyatma ramayana, balakanda, sarga 1
I don't get it. I saw a clip of family guy and then someone commenting "what show is this?" And then people writing names of shows and films other than family guy
I find it really rude, I mean it's not a common knowledge, not everyone knows about it, can't people just give some genuine answers without being sarcastic and unfunny.
Honestly it's annoying and not funny either. Similar happens on reddit too.
"Post about a genuine problem"
↓
"A sarcastic comment which isn't even funny"
↓
"Upvotes, and the genuine answers get buried under more such comments"
I had this doubt, how consciousness gave rise to material object. I know the world is result of maya, and from absolute pov, even the world doesn't exists. so how did material world came into being, even apparently? what's exactly relationship between brahman and maya?
Ladybug announced infront of everyone how gabriel agreste helped her in defeating monarch, while I initially accepted this, I feel kinda fishy about it. I mean how she lost the butterfly miraculous exactly? Tbh gabriel agreste kinda looked like a weird guy, he's a fashion designer but his fashion sucks lol. Anyways, what y'all think? Was gabe really a hero as ladybug told us or there's something else she's hiding?..
Edit - typos
In prathama praśna, saptadaśī kaṇdikā
Sutra 30 goes like धेन्वनडुहोर्भक्ष्यम् (इति)
Patrick olivelle translated it as "it's permitted to eat meat of milch cow and oxen"
I was concerned about it, can anyone do padaccheda of the sutra. Any commentators work on this particular sutra?
In prathama praśna, saptadaśī kaṇdikā
Sutra 30 goes like धेन्वनडुहोर्भक्ष्यम् (इति)
Patrick olivelle translated it as "it's permitted to eat meat of milch cow and oxen"
I was concerned about it, can anyone do padaccheda of the sutra. Any commentators work on this particular sutra?
Okay so with nam dhātu, chaturthi vibhakti is used, shouldn't ganga be in chaturthi vibhakti?